A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
Times Cited: 50







List of co-cited articles
209 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients.
Luca M Bigatello, Edward George, William E Hurford. Crit Care Med 2003
36
2

Confronting Ethical and Regulatory Challenges of Emergency Care Research With Conscious Patients.
Neal W Dickert, Jeremy Brown, Charles B Cairns, Aaliyah Eaves-Leanos, Sara F Goldkind, Scott Y H Kim, Graham Nichol, Katie J O'Conor, Jane D Scott, Richard Sinert,[...]. Ann Emerg Med 2016
23
4

Access barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa-a systematic review.
Minerva Kyei-Nimakoh, Mary Carolan-Olah, Terence V McCann. Syst Rev 2017
96
2

Communicating with communities about emergency research.
Lynne D Richardson, Tammie E Quest, Steven Birnbaum. Acad Emerg Med 2005
21
4

The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care.
Oona M R Campbell, Clara Calvert, Adrienne Testa, Matthew Strehlow, Lenka Benova, Emily Keyes, France Donnay, David Macleod, Sabine Gabrysch, Luo Rong,[...]. Lancet 2016
142
2

Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.
Maria J Silveira, Scott Y H Kim, Kenneth M Langa. N Engl J Med 2010
739
2



Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? .
R D Truog, W Robinson, A Randolph, A Morris. N Engl J Med 1999
140
2



Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
Tim Stokes, Elizabeth J Shaw, Janette Camosso-Stefinovic, Mari Imamura, Lovney Kanguru, Julia Hussein. Implement Sci 2016
29
3

Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: an integrated scientific and ethical approach.
Rieke van der Graaf, Indira S E van der Zande, Hester M den Ruijter, Martijn A Oudijk, Johannes J M van Delden, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Rolf H H Groenwold. Trials 2018
29
3

Research ethics needs fine tuning, not rigidity: how to promote evidence in neglected patient populations by rethinking informed consent.
J Wouter Jukema, Judith R Brouwer, Thomas F Lüscher, Dick P Engberts, Paul H A Quax. Eur Heart J 2015
4
25

The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research.
M H Schaeffer, D S Krantz, A Wichman, H Masur, E Reed, J K Vinicky. Am J Med 1996
124
2

What makes clinical research ethical?
E J Emanuel, D Wendler, C Grady. JAMA 2000
2



Informed consent for pragmatic trials--the integrated consent model.
Scott Y H Kim, Franklin G Miller. N Engl J Med 2014
100
2


Banking together. A unified model of informed consent for biobanking.
Elena Salvaterra, Lucilla Lecchi, Silvia Giovanelli, Barbara Butti, Maria Teresa Bardella, Pier Alberto Bertazzi, Silvano Bosari, Guido Coggi, Domenico A Coviello, Faustina Lalatta,[...]. EMBO Rep 2008
61
2

Inter- and intra-biobank networks: classification of biobanks.
Darren Shickle, Marcus Griffin, Karen El-Arifi. Pathobiology 2010
22
4

Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.
Laura M Beskow, Joëlle Y Friedman, N Chantelle Hardy, Li Lin, Kevin P Weinfurt. PLoS One 2010
60
2


Informed consent: Issues and challenges.
Lokesh P Nijhawan, Manthan D Janodia, B S Muddukrishna, K M Bhat, K L Bairy, N Udupa, Prashant B Musmade. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2013
57
2


The biobanking research infrastructure BBMRI_CZ: a critical tool to enhance translational cancer research.
P Holub, K Greplova, D Knoflickova, R Nenutil, D Valik. Klin Onkol 2012
4
25

The analysis of the ethical, organizational and legal aspects of Polish biobanks activity.
Jakub Pawlikowski, Jaroslaw Sak, Krzysztof Marczewski. Eur J Public Health 2010
9
11

Managing "incidental findings" in biobank research: Recommendations of the Taiwan biobank.
Jui-Chu Lin, Wesley Wei-Wen Hsiao, Chien-Te Fan. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2019
4
25

Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of 'routinisation' in prenatal screening.
Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Inez D de Beaufort, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Eline M Bunnik. J Med Ethics 2018
17
5

Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21: systematic review and report of quality and outcomes of diagnostic accuracy studies performed between 1997 and 2012.
E Mersy, L J M Smits, L A A P van Winden, C E M de Die-Smulders, A D C Paulussen, M V E Macville, A B C Coumans, S G M Frints. Hum Reprod Update 2013
48
2

Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issues.
Jean Gekas, Sylvie Langlois, Vardit Ravitsky, François Audibert, David Gradus van den Berg, Hazar Haidar, François Rousseau. Appl Clin Genet 2016
21
4

NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability.
Joanne B Taylor, Valerie Y Chock, Louanne Hudgins. J Genet Couns 2014
35
2

A new era in noninvasive prenatal testing.
Stephanie Morain, Michael F Greene, Michelle M Mello. N Engl J Med 2013
69
2


Prenatal counseling for congenital anomaly tests: parental preferences and perceptions of midwife performance.
L Martin, S Van Dulmen, E Spelten, A De Jonge, P De Cock, E Hutton. Prenat Diagn 2013
22
4

Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
Elisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van Leeuwen. Prenat Diagn 2008
42
2

Midwives' views on appropriate antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: do they match clients' preferences?
Linda Martin, Eileen K Hutton, Evelien R Spelten, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Sandra van Dulmen. Midwifery 2014
20
5

UK NHS pilot study on cell-free DNA testing in screening for fetal trisomies: factors affecting uptake.
M M Gil, G Giunta, E A Macalli, L C Poon, K H Nicolaides. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015
25
4

Offering a choice between NIPT and invasive PND in prenatal genetic counseling: the impact of clinician characteristics on patients' test uptake.
Sanne L van der Steen, Diewertje Houtman, Iris M Bakkeren, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Marike G Polak, Jan J Busschbach, Aad Tibben, Sam R Riedijk. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
7
14

The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.
Elisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van Leeuwen. Soc Sci Med 2008
51
2

Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands: An interview study exploring opinions about and experiences with societal pressure, reimbursement, and an expanding scope.
Iris M Bakkeren, Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Eline M Bunnik, Attie T J I Go, Aad Tibben, Inez D de Beaufort, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Sam R Riedijk. J Genet Couns 2020
6
16

Low uptake of the combined test in The Netherlands--which factors contribute?
Merel Bakker, Erwin Birnie, Eva Pajkrt, Caterina Maddalena Bilardo, Rosalinde Johanna Maria Snijders. Prenat Diagn 2012
50
2

The role of non-directiveness in genetic counseling.
Fuat S Oduncu. Med Health Care Philos 2002
20
5

Antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: an exploratory video-observational study about client-midwife communication.
Linda Martin, Eileen K Hutton, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Evelien R Spelten, Fleur Kuiper, Monique T R Pereboom, Sandra van Dulmen. Midwifery 2015
8
12

Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact.
Dick Oepkes, G C Lieve Page-Christiaens, Caroline J Bax, Mireille N Bekker, Catia M Bilardo, Elles M J Boon, G Heleen Schuring-Blom, Audrey B C Coumans, Brigitte H Faas, Robert-Jan H Galjaard,[...]. Prenat Diagn 2016
83
2


Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes.
Ronald J Wapner, Joshua E Babiarz, Brynn Levy, Melissa Stosic, Bernhard Zimmermann, Styrmir Sigurjonsson, Nicholas Wayham, Allison Ryan, Milena Banjevic, Phil Lacroute,[...]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015
170
2

Anonymising and sharing individual patient data.
Khaled El Emam, Sam Rodgers, Bradley Malin. BMJ 2015
63
2


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.