A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

S J D Prince, A D Pointon, B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurophysiol 2002
Times Cited: 163







List of co-cited articles
811 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex.
R L De Valois, D G Albrecht, L G Thorell. Vision Res 1982
927
5



Encoding of three-dimensional surface slant in cat visual areas 17 and 18.
Takahisa M Sanada, Izumi Ohzawa. J Neurophysiol 2006
14
35

Disparity channels in early vision.
Anna W Roe, Andrew J Parker, Richard T Born, Gregory C DeAngelis. J Neurosci 2007
55
9

Integrating motion and depth via parallel pathways.
Carlos R Ponce, Stephen G Lomber, Richard T Born. Nat Neurosci 2008
77
6

The processing of three-dimensional shape from disparity in the human brain.
Svetlana Georgieva, Ronald Peeters, Hauke Kolster, James T Todd, Guy A Orban. J Neurosci 2009
122
5

Adaptive estimation of three-dimensional structure in the human brain.
Tim J Preston, Zoe Kourtzi, Andrew E Welchman. J Neurosci 2009
31
16

A statistical explanation of visual space.
Zhiyong Yang, Dale Purves. Nat Neurosci 2003
72
6

Neuronal activity and its links with the perception of multi-stable figures.
Andrew J Parker, Kristine Krug, Bruce G Cumming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002
54
9

Representation of vestibular and visual cues to self-motion in ventral intraparietal cortex.
Aihua Chen, Gregory C DeAngelis, Dora E Angelaki. J Neurosci 2011
108
5


Natural image statistics and efficient coding.
B A Olshausen, D J Field. Network 1996
142
5



How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns.
Nicole C Rust, Valerio Mante, Eero P Simoncelli, J Anthony Movshon. Nat Neurosci 2006
306
5



Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations.
Marlene R Cohen, Adam Kohn. Nat Neurosci 2011
524
5

Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.
Wei Ji Ma, Jeffrey M Beck, Peter E Latham, Alexandre Pouget. Nat Neurosci 2006
670
5

The visual representation of 3D object orientation in parietal cortex.
Ari Rosenberg, Noah J Cowan, Dora E Angelaki. J Neurosci 2013
38
13



7 tesla FMRI reveals systematic functional organization for binocular disparity in dorsal visual cortex.
Nuno R Goncalves, Hiroshi Ban, Rosa M Sánchez-Panchuelo, Susan T Francis, Denis Schluppeck, Andrew E Welchman. J Neurosci 2015
46
10

Distribution of independent components of binocular natural images.
David William Hunter, Paul B Hibbard. J Vis 2015
13
38


How Can Single Sensory Neurons Predict Behavior?
Xaq Pitkow, Sheng Liu, Dora E Angelaki, Gregory C DeAngelis, Alexandre Pouget. Neuron 2015
70
7

Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.
William W Sprague, Emily A Cooper, Ivana Tošić, Martin S Banks. Sci Adv 2015
44
11





Macaque middle temporal neurons signal depth in the absence of motion.
Ben J A Palanca, Gregory C DeAngelis. J Neurosci 2003
33
12


Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons.
James R Cavanaugh, Wyeth Bair, J Anthony Movshon. J Neurophysiol 2002
506
4

Effect of stimulus size on the dynamics of orientation selectivity in Macaque V1.
Dajun Xing, Robert M Shapley, Michael J Hawken, Dario L Ringach. J Neurophysiol 2005
71
5



Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST.
J P Roy, H Komatsu, R H Wurtz. J Neurosci 1992
183
4


Disparity sensitivity and receptive field incongruity of units in the cat striate cortex.
R von der Heydt, C Adorjani, P Hänny, G Baumgartner. Exp Brain Res 1978
68
5


On the limits of stereoscopic vision.
K N OGLE. J Exp Psychol 1952
104
4

Stereo vision requires an explicit encoding of vertical disparity.
Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza, Jenny C A Read. J Vis 2009
17
23



A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals.
Yong Gu, Gregory C DeAngelis, Dora E Angelaki. Nat Neurosci 2007
207
4




Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.