A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
Times Cited: 52







List of co-cited articles
227 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial.
Miriam Kuppermann, Sherri Pena, Judith T Bishop, Sanae Nakagawa, Steven E Gregorich, Anita Sit, Juan Vargas, Aaron B Caughey, Susan Sykes, Lasha Pierce,[...]. JAMA 2014
70
3

Prenatal whole genome sequencing: just because we can, should we?
Greer Donley, Sara Chandros Hull, Benjamin E Berkman. Hastings Cent Rep 2012
36
5

From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.
Jane Kaye, Liam Curren, Nick Anderson, Kelly Edwards, Stephanie M Fullerton, Nadja Kanellopoulou, David Lund, Daniel G MacArthur, Deborah Mascalzoni, James Shepherd,[...]. Nat Rev Genet 2012
159
3

Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.
Willem Eijzenga, Daniela E E Hahn, Neil K Aaronson, Irma Kluijt, Eveline M A Bleiker. J Genet Couns 2014
28
7

Potential Psychosocial Risks of Sequencing Newborns.
Leslie Ann Frankel, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire. Pediatrics 2016
32
6

Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research.
Daniel B Thiel, Jodyn Platt, Tevah Platt, Susan B King, Nicole Fisher, Robert Shelton, Sharon L R Kardia. Public Health Genomics 2015
25
8

NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?
Rachèl V van Schendel, Wybo J Dondorp, Danielle R M Timmermans, Eline J H van Hugte, Anne de Boer, Eva Pajkrt, Augusta M A Lachmeijer, Lidewij Henneman. Prenat Diagn 2015
44
4

The Psychological Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Disclosure of Susceptibility Loci: First Impressions of Parents' Experiences.
S L van der Steen, S R Riedijk, J Verhagen-Visser, L C P Govaerts, M I Srebniak, D Van Opstal, M Joosten, M F C M Knapen, A Tibben, K E M Diderich,[...]. J Genet Couns 2016
26
7

The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.
Sam Riedijk, Karin E M Diderich, Sanne L van der Steen, Lutgarde C P Govaerts, Marieke Joosten, Maarten F C M Knapen, Femke A T de Vries, Diane van Opstal, Aad Tibben, Robert-Jan H Galjaard. J Clin Med 2014
17
11

Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing.
S L van der Steen, K E M Diderich, S R Riedijk, J Verhagen-Visser, L C P Govaerts, M Joosten, M F C M Knapen, D Van Opstal, M I Srebniak, A Tibben,[...]. Clin Genet 2015
32
6

Expanded carrier screening panels-does bigger mean better?
Sara Wienke, Kimberly Brown, Meagan Farmer, Charlie Strange. J Community Genet 2014
30
6


Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening.
W W Grody, G R Cutting, K W Klinger, C S Richards, M S Watson, R J Desnick. Genet Med 2001
288
3

On the future of genetic risk assessment.
Hans-Hilger Ropers. J Community Genet 2012
41
4

Changing trends in carrier screening for genetic disease in the United States.
Shivani B Nazareth, Gabriel A Lazarin, James D Goldberg. Prenat Diagn 2015
45
4

Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.
Lidewij Henneman, Pascal Borry, Davit Chokoshvili, Martina C Cornel, Carla G van El, Francesca Forzano, Alison Hall, Heidi C Howard, Sandra Janssens, Hülya Kayserili,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
121
3


"Is It Worth Knowing?" Focus Group Participants' Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening.
Jennifer L Schneider, Katrina A B Goddard, James Davis, Benjamin Wilfond, Tia L Kauffman, Jacob A Reiss, Marian Gilmore, Patricia Himes, Frances L Lynch, Michael C Leo,[...]. J Genet Couns 2016
31
6

Expanded carrier screening: A review of early implementation and literature.
Gabriel A Lazarin, Imran S Haque. Semin Perinatol 2016
36
5

Attitudes of European Geneticists Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening.
Sandra Janssens, Davit Chokoshvili, Danya Vears, Anne De Paepe, Pascal Borry. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2017
13
15

Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.
B Downe-Wamboldt. Health Care Women Int 1992
648
3


The changing landscape of carrier screening: expanding technology and options?.
Michelle L McGowan, Deborah Cho, Richard R Sharp. Health Matrix Clevel 2013
14
14

Population-based preconception carrier screening: how potential users from the general population view a test for 50 serious diseases.
Mirjam Plantinga, Erwin Birnie, Kristin M Abbott, Richard J Sinke, Anneke M Lucassen, Juliette Schuurmans, Seyma Kaplan, Marian A Verkerk, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M van Langen. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
42
4

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscape.
Kim C A Holtkamp, Evelien M Vos, Tessel Rigter, Phillis Lakeman, Lidewij Henneman, Martina C Cornel. BMC Health Serv Res 2017
13
15

Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Erik Parens, Cameron R Waldman, Robert Klitzman, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Hastings Cent Rep 2014
50
4

Comparison of participant information and informed consent forms of five European studies in genetic isolated populations.
Deborah Mascalzoni, A Cecile J W Janssens, Alison Stewart, Peter Pramstaller, Ulf Gyllensten, Igor Rudan, Cornelia M van Duijn, James F Wilson, Harry Campbell, Ruth M C Quillan. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
23
8

Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: a systematic review.
A Khan, B J Capps, M Y Sum, C N Kuswanto, K Sim. Clin Genet 2014
22
9

The emerging need for family-centric initiatives for obtaining consent in personal genome research.
Jusaku Minari, Harriet Teare, Colin Mitchell, Jane Kaye, Kazuto Kato. Genome Med 2014
12
16

Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice.
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Sandi Dheensa, Gillian Crawford, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen. J Med Genet 2014
37
5

Should you profit from your genome?
Jessica L Roberts, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire. Nat Biotechnol 2017
10
20

Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care.
Peter B Jensen, Lars J Jensen, Søren Brunak. Nat Rev Genet 2012
532
3

From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.
Kieran C O'Doherty, Michael M Burgess, Kelly Edwards, Richard P Gallagher, Alice K Hawkins, Jane Kaye, Veronica McCaffrey, David E Winickoff. Soc Sci Med 2011
89
3

Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?
Mats G Hansson, Joakim Dillner, Claus R Bartram, Joyce A Carlson, Gert Helgesson. Lancet Oncol 2006
228
3

Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?
Tobias Haeusermann, Bastian Greshake, Alessandro Blasimme, Darja Irdam, Martin Richards, Effy Vayena. PLoS One 2017
27
7


Precision medicine: Beyond the inflection point.
Sam Hawgood, India G Hook-Barnard, Theresa C O'Brien, Keith R Yamamoto. Sci Transl Med 2015
58
3

Caught in the web: informed consent for online health research.
Effy Vayena, Anna Mastroianni, Jeffrey Kahn. Sci Transl Med 2013
23
8

The digital phenotype.
Sachin H Jain, Brian W Powers, Jared B Hawkins, John S Brownstein. Nat Biotechnol 2015
111
3

Digital drug safety surveillance: monitoring pharmaceutical products in twitter.
Clark C Freifeld, John S Brownstein, Christopher M Menone, Wenjie Bao, Ross Filice, Taha Kass-Hout, Nabarun Dasgupta. Drug Saf 2014
130
3

Ethical endgames: broad consent for narrow interests; open consent for closed minds.
Jan Reinert Karlsen, Jan Helge Solbakk, Søren Holm. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2011
18
11

In defense of broad consent.
Gert Helgesson. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2012
39
5

Prenatal whole exome sequencing: the views of clinicians, scientists, genetic counsellors and patient representatives.
Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones, Mark D Kilby, Sheila Greenfield, Michael Parker, Dominic McMullan, Matthew E Hurles, Sarah C Hillman. Prenat Diagn 2016
27
7

Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine.
Ainsley J Newson, Samantha J Leonard, Alison Hall, Clara L Gaff. BMC Med Genomics 2016
43
4

Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.
Rachèl V van Schendel, G C Lieve Page-Christiaens, Lean Beulen, Catia M Bilardo, Marjon A de Boer, Audrey B C Coumans, Brigitte H Faas, Irene M van Langen, Klaske D Lichtenbelt, Merel C van Maarle,[...]. Prenat Diagn 2016
31
6

Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: parental attitudes.
Eve J Kalynchuk, Andrew Althouse, Lisa S Parker, Devereux N Saller, Aleksandar Rajkovic. Prenat Diagn 2015
33
6

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.
Wybo Dondorp, Guido de Wert, Yvonne Bombard, Diana W Bianchi, Carsten Bergmann, Pascal Borry, Lyn S Chitty, Florence Fellmann, Francesca Forzano, Alison Hall,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
48
4

Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing: An Argument for Professional Self-Regulation.
Benjamin E Berkman, Michelle Bayefsky. Am J Bioeth 2017
8
25


Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia: next-generation sequencing allows for a safer, more accurate, and comprehensive approach.
Lyn S Chitty, Sarah Mason, Angela N Barrett, Fiona McKay, Nicholas Lench, Rebecca Daley, Lucy A Jenkins. Prenat Diagn 2015
87
3


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.