A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013
Times Cited: 46







List of co-cited articles
176 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Citation     Count
Similarity


Population-based preconception carrier screening: how potential users from the general population view a test for 50 serious diseases.
Mirjam Plantinga, Erwin Birnie, Kristin M Abbott, Richard J Sinke, Anneke M Lucassen, Juliette Schuurmans, Seyma Kaplan, Marian A Verkerk, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M van Langen. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016
31
6

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscape.
Kim C A Holtkamp, Evelien M Vos, Tessel Rigter, Phillis Lakeman, Lidewij Henneman, Martina C Cornel. BMC Health Serv Res 2017
9
22

Comparison of participant information and informed consent forms of five European studies in genetic isolated populations.
Deborah Mascalzoni, A Cecile J W Janssens, Alison Stewart, Peter Pramstaller, Ulf Gyllensten, Igor Rudan, Cornelia M van Duijn, James F Wilson, Harry Campbell, Ruth M C Quillan. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010
23
8

Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: a systematic review.
A Khan, B J Capps, M Y Sum, C N Kuswanto, K Sim. Clin. Genet. 2014
19
10

Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice.
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Sandi Dheensa, Gillian Crawford, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen. J. Med. Genet. 2014
33
6

Have we asked too much of consent?
Barbara A Koenig. Hastings Cent Rep 2014
34
5

Should you profit from your genome?
Jessica L Roberts, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017
10
20

Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care.
Peter B Jensen, Lars J Jensen, Søren Brunak. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012
414
4

From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.
Kieran C O'Doherty, Michael M Burgess, Kelly Edwards, Richard P Gallagher, Alice K Hawkins, Jane Kaye, Veronica McCaffrey, David E Winickoff. Soc Sci Med 2011
78
4

Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?
Mats G Hansson, Joakim Dillner, Claus R Bartram, Joyce A Carlson, Gert Helgesson. Lancet Oncol. 2006
191
4

Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?
Tobias Haeusermann, Bastian Greshake, Alessandro Blasimme, Darja Irdam, Martin Richards, Effy Vayena. PLoS ONE 2017
24
8


Precision medicine: Beyond the inflection point.
Sam Hawgood, India G Hook-Barnard, Theresa C O'Brien, Keith R Yamamoto. Sci Transl Med 2015
47
4

Caught in the web: informed consent for online health research.
Effy Vayena, Anna Mastroianni, Jeffrey Kahn. Sci Transl Med 2013
21
9

The digital phenotype.
Sachin H Jain, Brian W Powers, Jared B Hawkins, John S Brownstein. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015
70
4

Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.
Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Harriet J A Teare, Jane Kaye, Stephan Beck, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Luciana Caenazzo, Clive Collett, Flavio D'Abramo, Heike Felzmann, Teresa Finlay,[...]. BMC Med Ethics 2017
48
4

Digital drug safety surveillance: monitoring pharmaceutical products in twitter.
Clark C Freifeld, John S Brownstein, Christopher M Menone, Wenjie Bao, Ross Filice, Taha Kass-Hout, Nabarun Dasgupta. Drug Saf 2014
109
4

Ethical endgames: broad consent for narrow interests; open consent for closed minds.
Jan Reinert Karlsen, Jan Helge Solbakk, Søren Holm. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2011
16
12

In defense of broad consent.
Gert Helgesson. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2012
31
6


Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.
Rachèl V van Schendel, G C Lieve Page-Christiaens, Lean Beulen, Catia M Bilardo, Marjon A de Boer, Audrey B C Coumans, Brigitte H Faas, Irene M van Langen, Klaske D Lichtenbelt, Merel C van Maarle,[...]. Prenat. Diagn. 2016
21
9

Changing to NIPT as a first-tier screening test and future perspectives: opinions of health professionals.
Saskia Tamminga, Rachèl V van Schendel, Wieke Rommers, Caterina M Bilardo, Eva Pajkrt, Wybo J Dondorp, Merel van Maarle, Martina C Cornel, Lidewij Henneman. Prenat. Diagn. 2015
15
13

Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. Genet. Med. 2010
111
4




Factors influencing health insurers' decisions to cover new genetic technologies.
M M Schoonmaker, B A Bernhardt, N A Holtzman. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000
15
6


Billing for medical genetics and genetic counseling services: a national survey.
Tabitha A Harrison, Debra Lochner Doyle, Caroline McGowan, Leslie Cohen, Elizabeth Repass, Ruthann B Pfau, Trish Brown. J Genet Couns 2010
16
6

Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Mylène Deschênes, Ma'n H Zawati, Anne Marie Tassé. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013
59
2



Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.
Sharon Hensley Alford, Colleen M McBride, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Public Health Genomics 2011
65
2

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
90
2

Attitudes toward direct-to-consumer advertisements and online genetic testing among high-risk women participating in a hereditary cancer clinic.
Giselle K Perez, Dean G Cruess, Stacy Cruess, Molly Brewer, Jennifer Stroop, Robin Schwartz, Robert Greenstein. J Health Commun 2011
11
9

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
72
2


Association between health-service use and multiplex genetic testing.
Robert J Reid, Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Cristofer Price, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody, Eric B Larson. Genet. Med. 2012
28
3

Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.
M Broadstock, S Michie, T Marteau. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2000
210
2

Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.
Aisha T Langford, Ken Resnicow, J Scott Roberts, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher. J Genet Couns 2012
24
4


Psychological distress with direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a case report of an unexpected BRCA positive test result.
Lindsay Dohany, Shanna Gustafson, Whitney Ducaine, Dana Zakalik. J Genet Couns 2012
16
6


The effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on anticipated affect and health-seeking behaviors: a pilot survey.
Nick Bansback, Sonia Sizto, Daphne Guh, Aslam H Anis. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2012
6
16

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs.
Kathryn T Hock, Kurt D Christensen, Beverly M Yashar, J Scott Roberts, Sarah E Gollust, Wendy R Uhlmann. Genet. Med. 2011
40
2

Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Nicole Wagner, Anh Quynh Le, Eve Halterman, Nadine Cornish, James W Dearing. J Genet Couns 2012
15
6

Self diagnosis of Lynch syndrome using direct to consumer genetic testing: a case study.
Maegan E Roberts, Douglas L Riegert-Johnson, Brittany C Thomas. J Genet Couns 2011
13
7

ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States.
Kathy Hudson, Gail Javitt, Wylie Burke, Peter Byers. Obstet Gynecol 2007
76
2

Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.
Pascal Borry, Rachel E van Hellemondt, Dominique Sprumont, Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Tade Matthias Spranger, Liam Curren, Jane Kaye, Herman Nys, Heidi Howard. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2012
53
2

Patterns of cancer genetic testing: a randomized survey of Oregon clinicians.
Summer L Cox, Amy I Zlot, Kerry Silvey, Debi Elliott, Tara Horn, Amber Johnson, Richard F Leman.  2012
18
5


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.