A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Eleanor Singer, Toni Antonucci, John Van Hoewyk. Genet Test 2004
Times Cited: 127







List of co-cited articles
481 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Diversity in Clinical and Biomedical Research: A Promise Yet to Be Fulfilled.
Sam S Oh, Joshua Galanter, Neeta Thakur, Maria Pino-Yanes, Nicolas E Barcelo, Marquitta J White, Danielle M de Bruin, Ruth M Greenblatt, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Alan H B Wu,[...]. PLoS Med 2015
247
1

Health and genetic ancestry testing: time to bridge the gap.
Andrew Smart, Deborah A Bolnick, Richard Tutton. BMC Med Genomics 2017
10
10

Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups.
Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Erica Blum-Barnett, Nikki M Carroll, Sarah D Madrid, Cabell Jonas, Kristen Janes, Monica Alvarado, Ruth Bedoy, Valerie Paolino, Nazneen Aziz,[...]. Public Health Genomics 2020
6
16

Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease.
Yvonne Bombard, Elizabeth Penziner, Oksana Suchowersky, Mark Guttman, Jane S Paulsen, Joan L Bottorff, Michael R Hayden. Eur J Hum Genet 2008
39
2

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Genomic Sequencing.
Daniel E Spratt, Tiffany Chan, Levi Waldron, Corey Speers, Felix Y Feng, Olorunseun O Ogunwobi, Joseph R Osborne. JAMA Oncol 2016
155
1



Health IT, hacking, and cybersecurity: national trends in data breaches of protected health information.
Jay G Ronquillo, J Erik Winterholler, Kamil Cwikla, Raphael Szymanski, Christopher Levy. JAMIA Open 2018
14
7

Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation.
Katrina A B Goddard, K Sabina Smith, Chuhe Chen, Carmit McMullen, Cheryl Johnson. Biopreserv Biobank 2009
29
3


De-identified genomic data sharing: the research participant perspective.
Deborah Goodman, Catherine O Johnson, Deborah Bowen, Megan Smith, Lari Wenzel, Karen Edwards. J Community Genet 2017
26
3

Attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer risk after genetic counseling and decision support: a qualitative comparison between hereditary cancer types.
Claire E Wakefield, Nadine A Kasparian, Bettina Meiser, Judi Homewood, Judy Kirk, Kathy Tucker. Genet Test 2007
8
12

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
210
1

Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.
Christopher R Long, M Kathryn Stewart, Thomas V Cunningham, T Scott Warmack, Pearl A McElfish. Clin Trials 2016
34
2

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
39
2

Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.
Katherine Wasson, Tonya Nashay Sanders, Nancy S Hogan, Sara Cherny, Kathy J Helzlsouer. J Community Genet 2013
25
4

Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
182
1

The research participant perspective related to the conduct of genomic cohort studies: A systematic review of the quantitative literature.
Deborah Goodman, Deborah Bowen, Lari Wenzel, Paris Tehrani, Francis Fernando, Araksi Khacheryan, Farihah Chowdhury, Catherine O Johnson, Karen Edwards. Transl Behav Med 2018
16
6



Great expectations: patient perspectives and anticipated utility of non-diagnostic genomic-sequencing results.
Robyn Hylind, Maureen Smith, Laura Rasmussen-Torvik, Sharon Aufox. J Community Genet 2018
14
7

A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.
Ellen W Clayton, Colin M Halverson, Nila A Sathe, Bradley A Malin. PLoS One 2018
45
2

Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.
N Arar, J Seo, S Lee, H E Abboud, L A Copeland, P Noel, M Parchman. Public Health Genomics 2010
16
6

Increasing the visibility of coding decisions in team-based qualitative research in nursing.
Carl Thompson, Dorothy McCaughan, Nicky Cullum, Trevor A Sheldon, Pauline Raynor. Int J Nurs Stud 2004
25
4




Genesurance Counseling: Patient Perspectives.
Chelsea Wagner, Lauren Murphy, Jacqueline Harkenrider, Sandra Darilek, Eleazar Soto-Torres, Quinn Stein, Jennifer Hoskovec. J Genet Couns 2018
9
11

Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.
Jill Fonda Allen, Katie Stoll, Barbara A Bernhardt. Semin Perinatol 2016
17
5

Reproductive Genetic Counseling to Asian-Pacific and Latin American Immigrants.
I Mittman, W R Crombleholme, J R Green, M S Golbus. J Genet Couns 1998
17
5

Variation in Women's Understanding of Prenatal Testing.
Allison S Bryant, Mary E Norton, Sanae Nakagawa, Judith T Bishop, Sherri Pena, Steven E Gregorich, Miriam Kuppermann. Obstet Gynecol 2015
24
4

Disparity in prenatal care among women of colour in the USA.
Jeong-Hwan Park, Deborah Vincent, Marie Hastings-Tolsma. Midwifery 2007
23
4

Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural Latinas.
Courtney Griffiths, Miriam Kuppermann. Matern Child Health J 2008
11
9

Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making.
Susan Markens, Carole H Browner, H Mabel Preloran. Sociol Health Illn 2010
33
3



Do notions of risk inform patient choice? Lessons from a study of prenatal genetic counseling.
Linda M Hunt, Heide Castañeda, Katherine B DE Voogd. Med Anthropol 2006
21
4

Newborn screening and the era of medical genomics.
Ludmila Francescatto, Nicholas Katsanis. Semin Perinatol 2015
14
7

Perceptions of Latinas on the Traditional Prenatal Genetic Counseling Model.
Stephanie Thompson, Sarah Jane Noblin, Jennifer Lemons, Susan K Peterson, Carlos Carreno, Andrea Harbison. J Genet Couns 2015
8
12

Genetic screening in a university clinic: impact of primary language.
Angela F Hawk, Lisa Pastore, Devereux N Saller. Prenat Diagn 2011
1
100

Decisions about prenatal testing for chromosomal disorders: perceptions of a diverse group of pregnant women.
A Moyer, B Brown, E Gates, M Daniels, H D Brown, M Kuppermann. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 1999
40
2

Genetic services to the latino population in the United States.
V B Penchaszadeh, D Puñales-Morejón. Community Genet 1998
5
20

Sequencing of Circulating Cell-free DNA during Pregnancy.
Diana W Bianchi, Rossa W K Chiu. N Engl J Med 2018
128
1

Ethnic differences in informed decision-making about prenatal screening for Down's syndrome.
Mirjam P Fransen, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Ineke Vogel, Johan P Mackenbach, Eric A P Steegers, Hajo I J Wildschut. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010
37
2

The Many Facets of Genetic Literacy: Assessing the Scalability of Multiple Measures for Broad Use in Survey Research.
Leah R Abrams, Colleen M McBride, Gillian W Hooker, Joseph N Cappella, Laura M Koehly. PLoS One 2015
26
3


What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers.
Kerry Scott, S W Beckham, Margaret Gross, George Pariyo, Krishna D Rao, Giorgio Cometto, Henry B Perry. Hum Resour Health 2018
181
1

Family stories: narrative genetics and conceptions of heritability in pregnant women.
Marsha Hurst, Caroline Lieber, Linwood J Lewis, Rachel Grob. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011
4
25

Knowledge, understanding, and uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing among Latina women.
Rachel Farrell, Anne Hawkins, Deborah Barragan, Louanne Hudgins, Joanne Taylor. Prenat Diagn 2015
31
3


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.