A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

R S Harwerth, E L Smith, R L Boltz, M L Crawford, G K von Noorden. Vision Res 1983
Times Cited: 92







List of co-cited articles
838 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity




Behavioral studies of the sensitive periods of development of visual functions in monkeys.
R S Harwerth, E L Smith, M L Crawford, G K von Noorden. Behav Brain Res 1990
67
11



Effects of enucleation of the nondeprived eye on stimulus deprivation amblyopia in monkeys.
R S Harwerth, E L Smith, M L Crawford, G K von Noorden. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984
21
38


Naturally occurring strabismus in monkeys (Macaca nemestrina).
L Kiorpes, R G Boothe. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981
39
20

Observations on the effects of form deprivation on the refractive status of the monkey.
E L Smith, R S Harwerth, M L Crawford, G K von Noorden. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987
112
7



Recovery from monocular deprivation in the monkey. III. Reversal of anatomical effects in the visual cortex.
N V Swindale, F Vital-Durand, C Blakemore. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1981
75
9



Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens.
D E Mitchell, M Cynader, J A Movshon. J Comp Neurol 1977
87
8

Prevalence of anisometropia in volunteer laboratory and school screening populations.
L M Almeder, L B Peck, H C Howland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990
69
10




Spatial vision in strabismic cats.
K Holopigian, R Blake. J Neurophysiol 1983
30
23

Spatio-temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia.
D M Levi, R S Harwerth. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977
230
7



Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens.
F Schaeffel, A Glasser, H C Howland. Vision Res 1988
484
6


Physiological basis of anisometropic amblyopia.
H M Eggers, C Blakemore. Science 1978
115
6




The effects of reverse monocular deprivation in monkeys. II. Electrophysiological and anatomical studies.
M L Crawford, J T de Faber, R S Harwerth, E L Smith, G K von Noorden. Exp Brain Res 1989
17
35

Binocular interactions in striate cortical neurons of cats reared with discordant visual inputs.
Y M Chino, E L Smith, K Yoshida, H Cheng, J Hamamoto. J Neurosci 1994
53
11

Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex.
R L De Valois, D G Albrecht, L G Thorell. Vision Res 1982
926
6

Classification of amblyopia.
G K Von Noorden. Am J Ophthalmol 1967
91
6

The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia.
R F Hess, I E Holliday. Vision Res 1992
120
6

Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia.
L Kiorpes, S P McKee. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999
137
6

Monocular spatial distortion in strabismic amblyopia.
H D Bedell, M C Flom. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981
134
6

Spatial aberrations and acuity in strabismus and amblyopia.
H E Bedell, M C Flom, R Barbeito. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985
67
8


The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia.
Suzanne P McKee, Dennis M Levi, J Anthony Movshon. J Vis 2003
328
6

Unequal corrected visual acuity as related to anisometropia.
A JAMPOLSKY, B C FLOM, F W WEYMOUTH, L E MOSES. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1955
46
13


Effects of the duration of early strabismus on the binocular responses of neurons in the monkey visual cortex (V1).
Takafumi Mori, Kazuki Matsuura, Bin Zhang, Earl L Smith, Yuzo M Chino. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002
41
14

Rhesus monkey as a model for normal vision of humans.
R S Harwerth, E L Smith. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985
71
8




Normality of spatial resolution of retinal ganglion cells in cats with strabismic amblyopia.
B G Cleland, D P Crewther, S G Crewther, D E Mitchell. J Physiol 1982
79
7

New clinical aspects of stimulus deprivation amblyopia.
G K von Noorden. Am J Ophthalmol 1981
60
10

Monocular acuity and stereopsis in infantile esotropia.
E E Birch, D R Stager. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985
76
7



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.