A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

F A Verstraten, M J van der Smagt, W A van de Grind. Perception 1998
Times Cited: 52







List of co-cited articles
393 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


A new transparent motion aftereffect.
M J van der Smagt, F A Verstraten, W A van de Grind. Nat Neurosci 1999
49
51

Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect.
E Hiris, R Blake. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992
76
36

Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.
W A van de Grind, P van Hof, M J van der Smagt, F A Verstraten. Proc Biol Sci 2001
43
44

Integration after adaptation to transparent motion: static and dynamic test patterns result in different aftereffect directions.
F A Verstraten, M J van der Smagt, R E Fredericksen, W A van de Grind. Vision Res 1999
36
47


The motion aftereffect.
S Anstis, F A Verstraten, G Mather. Trends Cogn Sci 1998
196
26


Independent speed-tuned global-motion systems.
M Edwards, D R Badcock, A T Smith. Vision Res 1998
58
21



Interaction of motion and color in the visual pathways.
K R Gegenfurtner, M J Hawken. Trends Neurosci 1996
127
19

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
19




Independent aftereffects of attention and motion.
J C Culham, F A Verstraten, H Ashida, P Cavanagh. Neuron 2000
69
17


Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered.
A C Huk, D Ress, D J Heeger. Neuron 2001
215
17








Electrophysiological evidence for independent speed channels in human motion processing.
Sven P Heinrich, Maarten J van der Smagt, Michael Bach, Michael B Hoffmann. J Vis 2004
29
27

Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: evidence for two mechanisms.
F A Verstraten, R E Fredericksen, R J Van Wezel, M J Lankheet, W A Van de Grind. Vision Res 1996
31
22

Movement aftereffect of bi-vectorial transparent motion.
F A Verstraten, R E Fredericksen, W A van de Grind. Vision Res 1994
55
13



Nulling the motion aftereffect with dynamic random-dot stimuli: limitations and implications.
Eric Castet, David R T Keeble, Frans A J Verstraten. J Vis 2002
16
43

Storage for free: a surprising property of a simple gain-control model of motion aftereffects.
Wim A van de Grind, Maarten J van der Smagt, Frans A J Verstraten. Vision Res 2004
28
25


The motion aftereffect reloaded.
George Mather, Andrea Pavan, Gianluca Campana, Clara Casco. Trends Cogn Sci 2008
97
13


Contrast dependencies of two types of motion aftereffect.
S Nishida, H Ashida, T Sato. Vision Res 1997
29
20




Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect.
J C Culham, S P Dukelow, T Vilis, F A Hassard, J S Gati, R S Menon, M A Goodale. J Neurophysiol 1999
88
11

Speed can go up as well as down at low contrast: implications for models of motion perception.
Peter Thompson, Kevin Brooks, Stephen T Hammett. Vision Res 2006
78
11





Rapid motion aftereffect seen within uniform flickering test fields.
M Green, M Chilcoat, C F Stromeyer. Nature 1983
18
27


Influence of viewing distance on aftereffects of moving random pixel arrays.
Wim A van de Grind, Frans A J Verstraten, Maarten J van der Smagt. Vision Res 2003
19
26

Motion adaptation in area MT.
Richard J A Van Wezel, Kenneth H Britten. J Neurophysiol 2002
89
9



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.