A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

B Bowles Biesecker, T M Marteau. Nat Genet 1999
Times Cited: 65







List of co-cited articles
279 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box.
B B Biesecker, K F Peters. Am J Med Genet 2001
106
16

Outcomes and process in genetic counselling.
A Clarke, E Parsons, A Williams. Clin Genet 1996
57
17

Goals of genetic counseling.
B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2001
119
12


BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.
C Lerman, S Narod, K Schulman, C Hughes, A Gomez-Caminero, G Bonney, K Gold, B Trock, D Main, J Lynch,[...]. JAMA 1996
603
10

Genetic risk and behavioural change.
T M Marteau, C Lerman. BMJ 2001
216
10



Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement.
S Shiloh, O Avdor, R M Goodman. Am J Med Genet 1990
92
9

Genetic counselling: information given, recall and satisfaction.
S Michie, V McDonald, T M Marteau. Patient Educ Couns 1997
53
11


Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions.
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, S D Sofia D Merajver. Soc Sci Med 2004
93
9

Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.
G Geller, J R Botkin, M J Green, N Press, B B Biesecker, B Wilfond, G Grana, M B Daly, K Schneider, M J Kahn. JAMA 1997
157
7

The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.
D G Evans, V Blair, R Greenhalgh, P Hopwood, A Howell. Br J Cancer 1994
137
7

Intention to learn results of genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer.
S W Vernon, E R Gritz, S K Peterson, C A Perz, S Marani, C I Amos, W F Baile. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999
74
7

The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study.
A Cull, H Miller, T Porterfield, J Mackay, E D Anderson, C M Steel, R A Elton. Br J Cancer 1998
97
7

Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.
C Lerman, B Biesecker, J L Benkendorf, J Kerner, A Gomez-Caminero, C Hughes, M M Reed. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997
274
7



Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: a survey of practitioners.
D M Bartels, B S LeRoy, P McCarthy, A L Caplan. Am J Med Genet 1997
43
11


The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.
M Watson, S Lloyd, J Davidson, L Meyer, R Eeles, S Ebbs, V Murday. Br J Cancer 1999
182
7

Future directions in genetic counseling: practical and ethical considerations.
Barbara Bowles Biesecker. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1998
40
12


Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study.
S Michie, F Bron, M Bobrow, T M Marteau. Am J Hum Genet 1997
104
7



Toward a model informed consent process for BRCA1 testing: a qualitative assessment of women's attitudes.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Gail Geller, Misha Strauss, Kathy J Helzlsouer, Michael Stefanek, Patti M Wilcox, Neil A Holtzman. J Genet Couns 1997
27
14

Genetic counseling.
. Am J Hum Genet 1975
110
6

Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.
C Lerman, E Lustbader, B Rimer, M Daly, S Miller, C Sands, A Balshem. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995
347
6

The impact of a brief problem-solving training intervention for relatives of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients.
M D Schwartz, C Lerman, J Audrain, D Cella, B Rimer, M Stefanek, J Garber, T H Lin, V Vogel. Ann Behav Med 1998
45
8

Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.
Patricia McCarthy Veach, Sarah E Truesdell, Bonnie S LeRoy, Dianne M Bartels. J Genet Couns 1999
34
11

Genetic counseling.
F C Fraser. Am J Hum Genet 1974
184
6

Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment.
B A Bernhardt, B B Biesecker, C L Mastromarino. Am J Med Genet 2000
99
6

Randomized trial of a specialist genetic assessment service for familial breast cancer.
K Brain, J Gray, P Norman, E France, C Anglim, G Barton, E Parsons, A Clarke, H Sweetland, M Tischkowitz,[...]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000
69
6

A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: the impact on self-reported mammography use.
M D Schwartz, B K Rimer, M Daly, C Sands, C Lerman. Am J Public Health 1999
52
7


Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.
P Hopwood, F Keeling, A Long, C Pool, G Evans, A Howell. Psychooncology 1998
89
6

Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?
M Watson, V Duvivier, M Wade Walsh, S Ashley, J Davidson, M Papaikonomou, V Murday, N Sacks, R Eeles. J Med Genet 1998
110
6

The impact of a brief coping skills intervention on adherence to breast self-examination among first-degree relatives of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
J Audrain, B Rimer, D Cella, M Stefanek, J Garber, M Pennanen, K Helzlsouer, V Vogel, T H Lin, C Lerman. Psychooncology 1999
38
10

Genetic counseling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer.
W Burke, J O Culver, D Bowen, D Lowry, S Durfy, A McTiernan, M R Andersen. Am J Med Genet 2000
76
6



Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling.
M Berkenstadt, S Shiloh, G Barkai, M B Katznelson, B Goldman. Am J Med Genet 1999
103
6


Assessment of education and counselling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic.
V Collins, J Halliday, R Warren, R Williamson. Clin Genet 2000
30
13


Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes.
M Aarnio, R Sankila, E Pukkala, R Salovaara, L A Aaltonen, A de la Chapelle, P Peltom√§ki, J P Mecklin, H J J√§rvinen. Int J Cancer 1999
812
6


Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.
M Broadstock, S Michie, T Marteau. Eur J Hum Genet 2000
238
6


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.