A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation.
C W Tyler, C C Chen. Vision Res 2000
Times Cited: 112






Login to export Results
Don't have an account? Register here

List of co-cited articles
754 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.
D G Pelli. J Opt Soc Am A 1985
516
49
49

Contrast masking in human vision.
G E Legge, J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am 1980
629
39
39

Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model.
J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994
371
31
31

Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.
Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson, Daniel H Baker. J Vis 2006
183
28
28

Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field.
J G Robson, N Graham. Vision Res 1981
386
27
27

A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection.
R F Quick. Kybernetik 1974
530
26
26

Probability summation for multiple patches of luminance modulation.
T S Meese, C B Williams. Vision Res 2000
39
21
53

Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.
Tim S Meese, Robert J Summers. J Vis 2009
46
21
45

Area summation in human vision at and above detection threshold.
Tim S Meese, Robert J Summers. Proc Biol Sci 2007
39
20
51

The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.
F A Wichmann, N J Hill. Percept Psychophys 2001
1497
19
19

On the psychometric function for contrast detection.
J Nachmias. Vision Res 1981
155
18
18

Spatially extensive summation of contrast energy is revealed by contrast detection of micro-pattern textures.
Tim S Meese. J Vis 2010
34
18
52

Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.
C C Chen, C W Tyler. Proc Biol Sci 2001
75
17
22

Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection.
J Nachmias, R V Sansbury. Vision Res 1974
330
17
17

Invariance of the slope of the psychometric function with spatial summation.
M J Mayer, C W Tyler. J Opt Soc Am A 1986
41
17
41

A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast.
Andrew B Watson, Albert J Ahumada. J Vis 2005
140
17
17

Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty: evidence for a noisy energy model.
Tim S Meese, Robert J Summers. J Vis 2012
25
17
68

Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex.
D J Heeger. Vis Neurosci 1992
1129
16
16

On the relation between summation and facilitation.
D G Pelli. Vision Res 1987
44
16
36

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
10331
16
16

Pattern detection in the presence of maskers that differ in spatial phase and temporal offset: threshold measurements and a model.
J M Foley, C C Chen. Vision Res 1999
47
15
31

Size matters, but not for everyone: individual differences for contrast discrimination.
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess, Cristyn B Williams. J Vis 2005
30
14
46

A transducer function for threshold and suprathreshold human vision.
H R Wilson. Biol Cybern 1980
144
13
13

Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision.
J M Foley, G E Legge. Vision Res 1981
182
13
13

Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.
F W Campbell, D G Green. Nature 1965
304
13
13

Orientation masking and cross-orientation suppression (XOS): implications for estimates of filter bandwidth.
Tim S Meese, David J Holmes. J Vis 2010
31
13
41

QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.
A B Watson, D G Pelli. Percept Psychophys 1983
1537
12
12

The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.
D G Pelli. Spat Vis 1997
6479
12
12

Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision.
J Ross, H D Speed. Proc Biol Sci 1991
138
12
12

Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency.
J Rovamo, O Luntinen, R Näsänen. Vision Res 1993
81
12
14

The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range.
J S Pointer, R F Hess. Vision Res 1989
123
12
12

Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.
John M Foley, Srinivasa Varadharajan, Chin C Koh, Mylene C Q Farias. Vision Res 2007
43
12
27

Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson. Spat Vis 2007
57
12
21

Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise.
Zhong-Lin Lu, Barbara Anne Dosher. Psychol Rev 2008
165
12
12

Contrast summation across eyes and space is revealed along the entire dipper function by a "Swiss cheese" stimulus.
Tim S Meese, Daniel H Baker. J Vis 2011
26
12
46

Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local "association field".
D J Field, A Hayes, R F Hess. Vision Res 1993
953
11
11

SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION.
G B WETHERILL, H LEVITT. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1965
898
11
11

The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings.
E R Howell, R F Hess. Vision Res 1978
188
11
11

Binocular contrast summation--I. Detection and discrimination.
G E Legge. Vision Res 1984
138
11
11

Area summation and masking.
Tim S Meese. J Vis 2004
38
11
28

Probability summation over time.
A B Watson. Vision Res 1979
400
11
11

The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.
F A Wichmann, N J Hill. Percept Psychophys 2001
589
11
11

Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.
D H Baker, T S Meese, R J Summers. Neuroscience 2007
81
11
13

Spatial-frequency channels in human vision.
M B Sachs, J Nachmias, J G Robson. J Opt Soc Am 1971
352
11
11

Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin.
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess. J Vis 2004
80
10
12

The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination.
R J Snowden, S T Hammett. Vision Res 1998
119
10
10

Separating the effects of response nonlinearity and internal noise psychophysically.
Leonid L Kontsevich, Chien-Chung Chen, Christopher W Tyler. Vision Res 2002
61
10
16

Spatial summation of peripheral Gabor patches.
V Manahilov, W A Simpson, D L McCulloch. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2001
14
10
71

Does a Bayesian model of V1 contrast coding offer a neurophysiological account of human contrast discrimination?
M Chirimuuta, D J Tolhurst. Vision Res 2005
37
10
27

Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.
L L Kontsevich, C W Tyler. Vision Res 1999
407
10
10


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.

Longstocking, LLC. © 2021
Home | About Us | FAQs | Terms & Privacy