B Khurana, K Watanabe, R Nijhawan. Perception 2000
Times Cited: 47
Times Cited: 47
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli.
D Whitney, I Murakami, P Cavanagh. Vision Res 2000
D Whitney, I Murakami, P Cavanagh. Vision Res 2000
70
70
Moving ahead through differential visual latency.
G Purushothaman, S S Patel, H E Bedell, H Ogmen. Nature 1998
G Purushothaman, S S Patel, H E Bedell, H Ogmen. Nature 1998
61
Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect.
E Brenner, J B Smeets. Vision Res 2000
E Brenner, J B Smeets. Vision Res 2000
61
51
48
Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli.
Marcus V C Baldo, Alexandre H Kihara, Janaina Namba, Stanley A Klein. Perception 2002
Marcus V C Baldo, Alexandre H Kihara, Janaina Namba, Stanley A Klein. Perception 2002
46
Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position.
B Krekelberg, M Lappe. Vision Res 1999
B Krekelberg, M Lappe. Vision Res 1999
42
The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast.
K Kirschfeld, T Kammer. Vision Res 1999
K Kirschfeld, T Kammer. Vision Res 1999
42
A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process.
B Krekelberg, M Lappe. Vision Res 2000
B Krekelberg, M Lappe. Vision Res 2000
42
Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina.
M J Berry, I H Brivanlou, T A Jordan, M Meister. Nature 1999
M J Berry, I H Brivanlou, T A Jordan, M Meister. Nature 1999
40
The position of moving objects.
B Krekelberg, M Lappe, D Whitney, P Cavanagh, D M Eagleman, T J Sejnowski. Science 2000
B Krekelberg, M Lappe, D Whitney, P Cavanagh, D M Eagleman, T J Sejnowski. Science 2000
40
34
Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects.
D M MACKAY. Nature 1958
D M MACKAY. Nature 1958
31
Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction.
S S Patel, H Ogmen, H E Bedell, V Sampath. Science 2000
S S Patel, H Ogmen, H E Bedell, V Sampath. Science 2000
29
Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation.
J Müsseler, G Aschersleben. Percept Psychophys 1998
J Müsseler, G Aschersleben. Percept Psychophys 1998
27
23
Extrapolating movement without retinal motion.
J Schlag, R H Cai, A Dorfman, A Mohempour, M Schlag-Rey. Nature 2000
J Schlag, R H Cai, A Dorfman, A Mohempour, M Schlag-Rey. Nature 2000
33
Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away.
S Mateeff, J Hohnsbein. Vision Res 1988
S Mateeff, J Hohnsbein. Vision Res 1988
23
The modulation of the flash-lag effect by voluntary attention.
Janaina Namba, Vinícius C Baldo. Perception 2004
Janaina Namba, Vinícius C Baldo. Perception 2004
47
Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction.
D Whitney, P Cavanagh, I Murakami. Vision Res 2000
D Whitney, P Cavanagh, I Murakami. Vision Res 2000
33
Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects.
D Whitney, P Cavanagh. Nat Neurosci 2000
D Whitney, P Cavanagh. Nat Neurosci 2000
19
Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target.
D Kerzel. Vision Res 2000
D Kerzel. Vision Res 2000
19
Predictability and the dynamics of position processing in the flash-lag effect.
Dawn Vreven, Preeti Verghese. Perception 2005
Dawn Vreven, Preeti Verghese. Perception 2005
47
Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization.
Ryota Kanai, Bhavin R Sheth, Shinsuke Shimojo. Vision Res 2004
Ryota Kanai, Bhavin R Sheth, Shinsuke Shimojo. Vision Res 2004
19
Visual prediction: psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays.
Romi Nijhawan. Behav Brain Sci 2008
Romi Nijhawan. Behav Brain Sci 2008
19
Dividing attention in the flash-lag illusion.
Dragica Sarich, Mark Chappell, Carly Burgess. Vision Res 2007
Dragica Sarich, Mark Chappell, Carly Burgess. Vision Res 2007
56
17
Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effect.
T Bachmann, E Põder. Vision Res 2001
T Bachmann, E Põder. Vision Res 2001
33
Motion-induced perceptual extrapolation of blurred visual targets.
Y X Fu, Y Shen, Y Dan. J Neurosci 2001
Y X Fu, Y Shen, Y Dan. J Neurosci 2001
17
Through the eye, slowly: delays and localization errors in the visual system.
J Schlag, M Schlag-Rey. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
J Schlag, M Schlag-Rey. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
17
The "Flash-Lag" effect occurs in audition and cross-modally.
David Alais, David Burr. Curr Biol 2003
David Alais, David Burr. Curr Biol 2003
17
Analogous mechanisms compensate for neural delays in the sensory and the motor pathways: evidence from motor flash-lag.
Romi Nijhawan, Kuno Kirschfeld. Curr Biol 2003
Romi Nijhawan, Kuno Kirschfeld. Curr Biol 2003
20
Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force.
T L Hubbard. Psychon Bull Rev 1995
T L Hubbard. Psychon Bull Rev 1995
14
46
Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.
David M Eagleman, Terrence J Sejnowski. J Vis 2007
David M Eagleman, Terrence J Sejnowski. J Vis 2007
14
Vestibular signals can distort the perceived spatial relationship of retinal stimuli.
R H Cai, K Jacobson, R Baloh, M Schlag-Rey, J Schlag. Exp Brain Res 2000
R H Cai, K Jacobson, R Baloh, M Schlag-Rey, J Schlag. Exp Brain Res 2000
50
Forward displacements of fading objects in motion: the role of transient signals in perceiving position.
Gerrit W Maus, Romi Nijhawan. Vision Res 2006
Gerrit W Maus, Romi Nijhawan. Vision Res 2006
16
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.