A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

I M Lipkus, G Samsa, B K Rimer. Med Decis Making 2001
Times Cited: 689







List of co-cited articles
297 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
Valerie F Reyna, Wendy L Nelson, Paul K Han, Nathan F Dieckmann. Psychol Bull 2009
482
24

The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography.
L M Schwartz, S Woloshin, W C Black, H G Welch. Ann Intern Med 1997
604
24

Numeracy and decision making.
Ellen Peters, Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic, C K Mertz, Ketti Mazzocco, Stephan Dickert. Psychol Sci 2006
372
18

Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.
Angela Fagerlin, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Peter A Ubel, Aleksandra Jankovic, Holly A Derry, Dylan M Smith. Med Decis Making 2007
414
16

Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.
Gerd Gigerenzer, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Elke Kurz-Milcke, Lisa M Schwartz, Steven Woloshin. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2007
427
15

Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.
Lyndal J Trevena, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Adrian Edwards, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Mirta Galesic, Paul K J Han, John King, Margaret L Lawson, Suzanne K Linder, Isaac Lipkus,[...]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013
250
10

Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach.
Joshua A Weller, Nathan F Dieckmann, Martin Tusler, C K Mertz, William J Burns, Ellen Peters. J Behav Decis Mak 2013
34
29

Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.
Wendy Nelson, Valerie F Reyna, Angela Fagerlin, Isaac Lipkus, Ellen Peters. Ann Behav Med 2008
151
9


Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.
Lisa D Chew, Katharine A Bradley, Edward J Boyko. Fam Med 2004
8

Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review.
Jessica S Ancker, Yalini Senathirajah, Rita Kukafka, Justin B Starren. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006
236
8

Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign.
Barry D Weiss, Mary Z Mays, William Martz, Kelley Merriam Castro, Darren A DeWalt, Michael P Pignone, Joy Mockbee, Frank A Hale. Ann Fam Med 2005
7

Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.
Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Dylan M Smith, Peter A Ubel, Angela Fagerlin. Med Decis Making 2007
189
7

Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication.
Angela Fagerlin, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Peter A Ubel. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011
296
7

Numeracy and Risk Literacy: What Have We Learned so Far?
Rocio Garcia-Retamero, Agata Sobkow, Dafina Petrova, Dunia Garrido, Jakub Traczyk. Span J Psychol 2019
10
70



Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Odette Wegwarth, David Skopec, Ann-Sophie Müller, Sebastian Broschinski, Mary C Politi. Health Psychol 2012
82
7

Multiple numeric competencies: When a number is not just a number.
Ellen Peters, Par Bjalkebring. J Pers Soc Psychol 2015
46
13


Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review.
Daniella A Zipkin, Craig A Umscheid, Nancy L Keating, Elizabeth Allen, KoKo Aung, Rebecca Beyth, Scott Kaatz, Devin M Mann, Jeremy B Sussman, Deborah Korenstein,[...]. Ann Intern Med 2014
171
6


Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.
Jessica S Ancker, David Kaufman. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007
129
5


Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect?
Rocio Garcia-Retamero, Mirta Galesic, Gerd Gigerenzer. Med Decis Making 2010
87
5


A definition and operational framework for health numeracy.
Amanda L Golbeck, Carolyn R Ahlers-Schmidt, Angelia M Paschal, S Edwards Dismuke. Am J Prev Med 2005
142
5

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.
Jonathan St B T Evans, Keith E Stanovich. Perspect Psychol Sci 2013
547
5

The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.
Sarah T Hawley, Brian Zikmund-Fisher, Peter Ubel, Aleksandra Jancovic, Todd Lucas, Angela Fagerlin. Patient Educ Couns 2008
216
5

Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.
Ellen Peters, Nathan Dieckmann, Anna Dixon, Judith H Hibbard, C K Mertz. Med Care Res Rev 2007
263
5

G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
5

Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison.
Mirta Galesic, Rocio Garcia-Retamero. Med Decis Making 2011
98
5

Numbers matter to informed patient choices: a randomized design across age and numeracy levels.
Ellen Peters, P Sol Hart, Martin Tusler, Liana Fraenkel. Med Decis Making 2014
41
12

Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, Albert-Georg Lang. Behav Res Methods 2009
5

Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.
Lisa D Chew, Joan M Griffin, Melissa R Partin, Siamak Noorbaloochi, Joseph P Grill, Annamay Snyder, Katharine A Bradley, Sean M Nugent, Alisha D Baines, Michelle Vanryn. J Gen Intern Med 2008
787
5

Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.
T C Davis, S W Long, R H Jackson, E J Mayeaux, R B George, P W Murphy, M A Crouch. Fam Med 1993
4

Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy.
Mirta Galesic, Rocio Garcia-Retamero, Gerd Gigerenzer. Health Psychol 2009
162
4

Subjective numeracy scale as a tool for assessing statistical numeracy in older adult populations.
Jonathan J Rolison, Stacey Wood, Yaniv Hanoch, Pi-Ju Liu. Gerontology 2013
12
33

What do men understand about lifetime risk following genetic testing? The effect of context and numeracy.
Jonathan J Rolison, Yaniv Hanoch, Talya Miron-Shatz. Health Psychol 2012
17
23

Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.
Jolyn Hersch, Alexandra Barratt, Jesse Jansen, Les Irwig, Kevin McGeechan, Gemma Jacklyn, Hazel Thornton, Haryana Dhillon, Nehmat Houssami, Kirsten McCaffery. Lancet 2015
160
4

Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.
Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Peter A Ubel, Dylan M Smith, Holly A Derry, Jennifer B McClure, Azadeh Stark, Rosemarie K Pitsch, Angela Fagerlin. Patient Educ Couns 2008
108
4


The Single Item Literacy Screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability.
Nancy S Morris, Charles D MacLean, Lisa D Chew, Benjamin Littenberg. BMC Fam Pract 2006
375
4

Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions.
D Feldman-Stewart, N Kocovski, B A McConnell, M D Brundage, W J Mackillop. Med Decis Making 2000
114
4


Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data.
Stacey L Sheridan, Michael Pignone. Eff Clin Pract 2002
83
4

Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
Vivianne H M Visschers, Ree M Meertens, Wim W F Passchier, Nanne N K de Vries. Risk Anal 2009
114
4

Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication.
Dafina Petrova, Olga Kostopoulou, Brendan C Delaney, Edward T Cokely, Rocio Garcia-Retamero. Med Decis Making 2018
17
23


Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.
Nancy D Berkman, Stacey L Sheridan, Katrina E Donahue, David J Halpern, Karen Crotty. Ann Intern Med 2011
3


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.