A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Caroline Thaung, Karen Arnold, Ian J Jackson, Peter J Coffey. Neurosci. Lett. 2002
Times Cited: 45







List of co-cited articles
227 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system.
R M Douglas, N M Alam, B D Silver, T J McGill, W W Tschetter, G T Prusky. Vis. Neurosci. 2005
229
31

Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats.
G T Prusky, P W West, R M Douglas. Vision Res. 2000
282
28

Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system.
Glen T Prusky, Nazia M Alam, Steven Beekman, Robert M Douglas. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004
434
20



The optomotor response: a robust first-line visual screening method for mice.
Jellali Abdeljalil, Meziane Hamid, Ouagazzal Abdel-Mouttalib, Rousseau Stéphane, Romand Raymond, Auwerx Johan, Sahel José, Chambon Pierre, Picaud Serge. Vision Res. 2005
59
17

Grating acuity at different luminances in wild-type mice and in mice lacking rod or cone function.
Christine Schmucker, Mathias Seeliger, Pete Humphries, Martin Biel, Frank Schaeffel. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005
47
15

Behavioural visual acuity of wild type and bcl2 transgenic mouse.
L Gianfranceschi, A Fiorentini, L Maffei. Vision Res. 1999
55
13

Tests of the mouse visual system.
L H Pinto, C Enroth-Cugell. Mamm. Genome 2000
63
13

Optokinetic test to evaluate visual acuity of each eye independently.
Biju B Thomas, Magdalene J Seiler, SriniVas R Sadda, Peter J Coffey, Robert B Aramant. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004
38
15


Visually evoked eye movements in the mouse (Mus musculus).
J C Mitchiner, L H Pinto, J W Vanable. Vision Res. 1976
29
17

Behavioral and functional analysis of mouse phenotype: SHIRPA, a proposed protocol for comprehensive phenotype assessment.
D C Rogers, E M Fisher, S D Brown, J Peters, A J Hunter, J E Martin. Mamm. Genome 1997
472
11

Characterizing visual performance in mice: an objective and automated system based on the optokinetic reflex.
Boris Benkner, Marion Mutter, Gerrit Ecke, Thomas A Münch. Behav. Neurosci. 2013
20
25

OMR-arena: automated measurement and stimulation system to determine mouse visual thresholds based on optomotor responses.
Friedrich Kretschmer, Viola Kretschmer, Vincent P Kunze, Jutta Kretzberg. PLoS ONE 2013
19
26

Correlates of photoreceptor rescue by transplantation of human fetal RPE in the RCS rat.
C W Little, C Cox, J Wyatt, C del Cerro, M del Cerro. Exp. Neurol. 1998
37
10


Sensory capacity of the royal college of surgeons rat.
L Hetherington, M Benn, P J Coffey, R D Lund. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000
25
16

Cell transplantation as a treatment for retinal disease.
R D Lund, A S Kwan, D J Keegan, Y Sauvé, P J Coffey, J M Lawrence. Prog Retin Eye Res 2001
86
8

Retinal transplantation-induced recovery of retinotectal visual function in a rodent model of retinitis pigmentosa.
Botir T Sagdullaev, Robert B Aramant, Magdalene J Seiler, Gustaw Woch, Maureen A McCall. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003
62
8

Long-term preservation of cortically dependent visual function in RCS rats by transplantation.
P J Coffey, S Girman, S M Wang, L Hetherington, D J Keegan, P Adamson, J Greenwood, R D Lund. Nat. Neurosci. 2002
147
8

The optokinetic nystagmus and ocular pigmentation of hypopigmented mouse mutants.
N J Mangini, J W Vanable, M A Williams, L H Pinto. J. Comp. Neurol. 1985
37
10

Novel ENU-induced eye mutations in the mouse: models for human eye disease.
Caroline Thaung, Katrine West, Brian J Clark, Lisa McKie, Joanne E Morgan, Karen Arnold, Patrick M Nolan, Jo Peters, A Jackie Hunter, Steve D M Brown,[...]. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002
89
8

Evaluation of the rhodopsin knockout mouse as a model of pure cone function.
G B Jaissle, C A May, J Reinhard, K Kohler, S Fauser, E Lütjen-Drecoll, E Zrenner, M W Seeliger. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001
95
8

Genotype-phenotype correlation of mouse pde6b mutations.
Alan W Hart, Lisa McKie, Joanne E Morgan, Philippe Gautier, Katrine West, Ian J Jackson, Sally H Cross. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005
55
8

A comparison of video and magnetic search coil recordings of mouse eye movements.
J S Stahl, A M van Alphen, C I De Zeeuw. J. Neurosci. Methods 2000
126
8

Variation of the response to the optokinetic drum among various strains of mice.
Oliver Puk, Claudia Dalke, Martin Hrabé de Angelis, Jochen Graw. Front. Biosci. 2008
20
20

Retinopathy induced in mice by targeted disruption of the rhodopsin gene.
M M Humphries, D Rancourt, G J Farrar, P Kenna, M Hazel, R A Bush, P A Sieving, D M Sheils, N McNally, P Creighton,[...]. Nat. Genet. 1997
369
8

Initiation of the optokinetic response (OKR) in mice.
Hiromitsu Tabata, Naoki Shimizu, Yoshiro Wada, Kenichiro Miura, Kenji Kawano. J Vis 2010
33
12

Age- and sex-related differences in contrast sensitivity in C57BL/6 mice.
Bart van Alphen, Beerend H J Winkelman, Maarten A Frens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009
33
12

A system to measure the Optokinetic and Optomotor response in mice.
Friedrich Kretschmer, Szilard Sajgo, Viola Kretschmer, Tudor C Badea. J. Neurosci. Methods 2015
24
16

Schwann cell grafting into the retina of the dystrophic RCS rat limits functional deterioration. Royal College of Surgeons.
J M Lawrence, Y Sauvé, D J Keegan, P J Coffey, L Hetherington, S Girman, S J Whiteley, A S Kwan, T Pheby, R D Lund. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000
75
6


Retinal transplants restore visually evoked responses in rats with photoreceptor degeneration.
G Woch, R B Aramant, M J Seiler, B T Sagdullaev, M A McCall. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001
68
6


Subretinal transplantation of genetically modified human cell lines attenuates loss of visual function in dystrophic rats.
R D Lund, P Adamson, Y Sauvé, D J Keegan, S V Girman, S Wang, H Winton, N Kanuga, A S Kwan, L Beauchène,[...]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001
119
6

Optomotor test for wavelength sensitivity in guppyfish (Poecilia reticulata).
S Anstis, P Hutahajan, P Cavanagh. Vision Res. 1998
26
11

Electroretinography as a screening method for mutations causing retinal dysfunction in mice.
Claudia Dalke, Jana Löster, Helmut Fuchs, Valerie Gailus-Durner, Dian Soewarto, Jack Favor, Angelika Neuhäuser-Klaus, Walter Pretsch, Florian Gekeler, Kei Shinoda,[...]. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004
37
8


Mouse fundus photography and angiography: a catalogue of normal and mutant phenotypes.
N L Hawes, R S Smith, B Chang, M Davisson, J R Heckenlively, S W John. Mol. Vis. 1999
93
6

Visually evoked eye movements in mouse mutants and inbred strains. A screening report.
G W Balkema, N J Mangini, L H Pinto, J W Vanable. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1984
28
10

Large scale ENU screens in the mouse: genetics meets genomics.
M Hrabé de Angelis, R Balling. Mutat. Res. 1998
67
6

Superior colliculus responses to light - preserved by transplantation in a slow degeneration rat model.
Biju B Thomas, Magdalene J Seiler, SriniVas R Sadda, Robert B Aramant. Exp. Eye Res. 2004
39
7

Multipotent retinal progenitors express developmental markers, differentiate into retinal neurons, and preserve light-mediated behavior.
Henry J Klassen, Tat Fong Ng, Yasuo Kurimoto, Ivan Kirov, Marie Shatos, Peter Coffey, Michael J Young. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004
200
6




A key role of starburst amacrine cells in originating retinal directional selectivity and optokinetic eye movement.
K Yoshida, D Watanabe, H Ishikane, M Tachibana, I Pastan, S Nakanishi. Neuron 2001
222
6


Opa1 deficiency in a mouse model of autosomal dominant optic atrophy impairs mitochondrial morphology, optic nerve structure and visual function.
Vanessa J Davies, Andrew J Hollins, Malgorzata J Piechota, Wanfen Yip, Jennifer R Davies, Kathryn E White, Phillip P Nicols, Michael E Boulton, Marcela Votruba. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007
219
6


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.