A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
707 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004
131
31

Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.
M Horowitz, N Wilner, W Alvarez. Psychosom Med 1979
21

Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review.
Phyllis N Butow, Elizabeth A Lobb, Bettina Meiser, Alexandra Barratt, Katherine M Tucker. Med J Aust 2003
122
21


The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.
M Watson, S Lloyd, J Davidson, L Meyer, R Eeles, S Ebbs, V Murday. Br J Cancer 1999
182
16

A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy.
Chris M R Smerecnik, Ilse Mesters, Eline Verweij, Nanne K de Vries, Hein de Vries. J Genet Couns 2009
82
19

Breast cancer risk counseling improves women's functioning.
Deborah J Bowen, Wylie Burke, Anne McTiernan, Yutaka Yasui, M Robyn Andersen. Patient Educ Couns 2004
53
28

Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.
C Lerman, E Lustbader, B Rimer, M Daly, S Miller, C Sands, A Balshem. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995
345
15

Randomized trial of a specialist genetic assessment service for familial breast cancer.
K Brain, J Gray, P Norman, E France, C Anglim, G Barton, E Parsons, A Clarke, H Sweetland, M Tischkowitz,[...]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000
69
21



The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.
A Cull, E D Anderson, S Campbell, J Mackay, E Smyth, M Steel. Br J Cancer 1999
120
13

Long-term outcomes of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.
B Meiser, P N Butow, A L Barratt, V Schnieden, M Gattas, J Kirk, C Gaff, G Suthers, K Tucker. Patient Educ Couns 2001
68
19

Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions.
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, S D Sofia D Merajver. Soc Sci Med 2004
89
14

A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
354
13

Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.
C Lerman, B Biesecker, J L Benkendorf, J Kerner, A Gomez-Caminero, C Hughes, M M Reed. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997
270
12

The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study.
A Cull, H Miller, T Porterfield, J Mackay, E D Anderson, C M Steel, R A Elton. Br J Cancer 1998
96
12

Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.
Michael J Green, Susan K Peterson, Maria Wagner Baker, Gregory R Harper, Lois C Friedman, Wendy S Rubinstein, David T Mauger. JAMA 2004
216
12

The hospital anxiety and depression scale.
A S Zigmond, R P Snaith. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983
11

Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.
M Broadstock, S Michie, T Marteau. Eur J Hum Genet 2000
234
11

Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.
D Ford, D F Easton, M Stratton, S Narod, D Goldgar, P Devilee, D T Bishop, B Weber, G Lenoir, J Chang-Claude,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 1998
11

Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes.
E A Lobb, P N Butow, A Barratt, B Meiser, C Gaff, M A Young, E Haan, G Suthers, M Gattas, K Tucker. Br J Cancer 2004
96
11

Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening.
C Lerman, B Trock, B K Rimer, C Jepson, D Brody, A Boyce. Health Psychol 1991
388
10

Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment.
B A Bernhardt, B B Biesecker, C L Mastromarino. Am J Med Genet 2000
99
10

Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.
Marc D Schwartz, Beth N Peshkin, Chanita Hughes, David Main, Claudine Isaacs, Caryn Lerman. J Clin Oncol 2002
175
10


Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton. Fam Cancer 2006
63
15

Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.
P Hopwood, F Keeling, A Long, C Pool, G Evans, A Howell. Psychooncology 1998
89
10

Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?
M Watson, V Duvivier, M Wade Walsh, S Ashley, J Davidson, M Papaikonomou, V Murday, N Sacks, R Eeles. J Med Genet 1998
108
9

The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.
D G Evans, V Blair, R Greenhalgh, P Hopwood, A Howell. Br J Cancer 1994
137
9


A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.
Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker, Herman F J ten Kroode, Margreet G E M Ausems. Patient Educ Couns 2006
62
14

Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.
A Antoniou, P D P Pharoah, S Narod, H A Risch, J E Eyfjord, J L Hopper, N Loman, H Olsson, O Johannsson, A Borg,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2003
9

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
219
9


Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics?
K Brain, J Gray, P Norman, E Parsons, A Clarke, C Rogers, R Mansel, P Harper. J Med Genet 2000
85
9

Genetic counseling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer.
W Burke, J O Culver, D Bowen, D Lowry, S Durfy, A McTiernan, M R Andersen. Am J Med Genet 2000
75
10



Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.
Iris van Oostrom, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Litanja N Lodder, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Arthur R van Gool, Caroline Seynaeve, Conny A van der Meer, Jan G M Klijn, Bert N van Geel, Curt W Burger,[...]. J Clin Oncol 2003
191
8

Goals of genetic counseling.
B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2001
118
8

Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling.
M Berkenstadt, S Shiloh, G Barkai, M B Katznelson, B Goldman. Am J Med Genet 1999
104
8

A randomised controlled trial of breast cancer genetics services in South East Scotland: psychological impact.
A Fry, A Cull, S Appleton, R Rush, S Holloway, D Gorman, R Cetnarskyj, R Thomas, J Campbell, E Anderson,[...]. Br J Cancer 2003
38
21

Women's preferences and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes.
E A Lobb, P N Butow, B Meiser, A Barratt, C Gaff, M A Young, J Kirk, M Gattas, M Gleeson, K Tucker. J Med Genet 2003
42
19

Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic services.
Claire Julian-Reynier, Myriam Welkenhuysen, Lea Hagoel, Marleen Decruyenaere, Penelope Hopwood. Eur J Hum Genet 2003
55
14

Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process.
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, Kara J Milliron, Victor J Strecher, Sofia D Merajver. Am J Med Genet A 2005
54
14






Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.