A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Walter L Devillé, Frank Buntinx, Lex M Bouter, Victor M Montori, Henrica C W de Vet, Danielle A W M van der Windt, P Dick Bezemer. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002
Times Cited: 653







List of co-cited articles
203 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Penny F Whiting, Anne W S Rutjes, Marie E Westwood, Susan Mallett, Jonathan J Deeks, Johannes B Reitsma, Mariska M G Leeflang, Jonathan A C Sterne, Patrick M M Bossuyt. Ann Intern Med 2011
73


Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Johannes B Reitsma, Afina S Glas, Anne W S Rutjes, Rob J P M Scholten, Patrick M Bossuyt, Aeilko H Zwinderman. J Clin Epidemiol 2005
30


Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
Matthew D F McInnes, David Moher, Brett D Thombs, Trevor A McGrath, Patrick M Bossuyt, Tammy Clifford, Jérémie F Cohen, Jonathan J Deeks, Constantine Gatsonis, Lotty Hooft,[...]. JAMA 2018
834
27


Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson, Jonathan J Deeks, Douglas G Altman. BMJ 2003
22



The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.
Afina S Glas, Jeroen G Lijmer, Martin H Prins, Gouke J Bonsel, Patrick M M Bossuyt. J Clin Epidemiol 2003
16

Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data.
Javier Zamora, Victor Abraira, Alfonso Muriel, Khalid Khan, Arri Coomarasamy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006
15

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher. BMJ 2009
11

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. PLoS Med 2009
11

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher. Ann Intern Med 2009
10

A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Roger M Harbord, Jonathan J Deeks, Matthias Egger, Penny Whiting, Jonathan A C Sterne. Biostatistics 2007
439
7


Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson. Stat Med 2002
7

Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Mariska M G Leeflang, Jonathan J Deeks, Constantine Gatsonis, Patrick M M Bossuyt. Ann Intern Med 2008
752
7

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.
Penny Whiting, Anne W S Rutjes, Johannes B Reitsma, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Jos Kleijnen. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003
7

Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
R DerSimonian, N Laird. Control Clin Trials 1986
5

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher. J Clin Epidemiol 2009
5



Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. Ann Intern Med 2009
5



Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
Mariska M G Leeflang, Jonathan J Deeks, Anne W S Rutjes, Johannes B Reitsma, Patrick M M Bossuyt. J Clin Epidemiol 2012
51
7

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart. Syst Rev 2015
4




Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed?
Michael J Overman, Janhavi Modak, Scott Kopetz, Ravi Murthy, James C Yao, Marshall E Hicks, James L Abbruzzese, Alda L Tam. J Clin Oncol 2013
179
3

Comparison of EGFR signaling pathway somatic DNA mutations derived from peripheral blood and corresponding tumor tissue of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer using liquidchip technology.
Hui Zhang, Deruo Liu, Shanqing Li, Yongqing Zheng, Xinjie Yang, Xi Li, Quan Zhang, Na Qin, Jialin Lu, Lifen Ren-Heidenreich,[...]. J Mol Diagn 2013
44
6

Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Penny F Whiting, Marie E Weswood, Anne W S Rutjes, Johannes B Reitsma, Patrick N M Bossuyt, Jos Kleijnen. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006
508
3

Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
Trevor A McGrath, Mostafa Alabousi, Becky Skidmore, Daniël A Korevaar, Patrick M M Bossuyt, David Moher, Brett Thombs, Matthew D F McInnes. Syst Rev 2017
63
4

Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Tania B Huedo-Medina, Julio Sánchez-Meca, Fulgencio Marín-Martínez, Juan Botella. Psychol Methods 2006
3

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
M Egger, G Davey Smith, M Schneider, C Minder. BMJ 1997
3

STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.
Jérémie F Cohen, Daniël A Korevaar, Douglas G Altman, David E Bruns, Constantine A Gatsonis, Lotty Hooft, Les Irwig, Deborah Levine, Johannes B Reitsma, Henrica C W de Vet,[...]. BMJ Open 2016
680
3


Imaging the Nigrosome 1 in the substantia nigra using susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping: An application to Parkinson's disease.
Zenghui Cheng, Naying He, Pei Huang, Yan Li, Rongbiao Tang, Sean K Sethi, Kiarash Ghassaban, Kiran Kumar Yerramsetty, Vinay Kumar Palutla, Shengdi Chen,[...]. Neuroimage Clin 2020
26
11

Clinical utility of visualisation of nigrosome-1 in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Albert Stezin, Rajini M Naduthota, Ragasudha Botta, Shriram Varadharajan, Abhishek Lenka, Jitender Saini, Ravi Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pal. Eur Radiol 2018
15
20


Comparative Study of MRI Biomarkers in the Substantia Nigra to Discriminate Idiopathic Parkinson Disease.
N Pyatigorskaya, B Magnin, M Mongin, L Yahia-Cherif, R Valabregue, D Arnaldi, C Ewenczyk, C Poupon, M Vidailhet, S Lehéricy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018
28
10




Combined Visualization of Nigrosome-1 and Neuromelanin in the Substantia Nigra Using 3T MRI for the Differential Diagnosis of Essential Tremor and de novo Parkinson's Disease.
Lirong Jin, Jian Wang, Changpeng Wang, Danlan Lian, Ying Zhou, Yong Zhang, Minzhi Lv, Yuanfang Li, Zhen Huang, Xiaoqin Cheng,[...]. Front Neurol 2019
22
13

MR imaging of the substantia nigra at 7 T enables diagnosis of Parkinson disease.
Mirco Cosottini, Daniela Frosini, Ilaria Pesaresi, Mauro Costagli, Laura Biagi, Roberto Ceravolo, Ubaldo Bonuccelli, Michela Tosetti. Radiology 2014
90
3

Dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on 3.0T susceptibility-weighted imaging in neurodegenerative Parkinsonism.
Eva Reiter, Christoph Mueller, Bernadette Pinter, Florian Krismer, Christoph Scherfler, Regina Esterhammer, Christian Kremser, Michael Schocke, Gregor K Wenning, Werner Poewe,[...]. Mov Disord 2015
88
3

Multiparametric MR imaging of Parkinsonisms at 3 tesla: Its role in the differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson's disease versus atypical Parkinsonian disorders.
S F Calloni, G Conte, S Sbaraini, R Cilia, V E Contarino, S Avignone, G Sacilotto, G Pezzoli, F M Triulzi, E Scola. Eur J Radiol 2018
14
21


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.