A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Miguel P Eckstein, Steven S Shimozaki, Craig K Abbey. J Vis 2002
Times Cited: 93







List of co-cited articles
844 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Orienting of attention.
M I Posner. Q J Exp Psychol 1980
38

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
33

Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.
J Palmer, C T Ames, D T Lindsey. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1993
275
26


External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms.
Z L Lu, B A Dosher. Vision Res 1998
357
25


Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.
R Desimone, J Duncan. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995
21

Attention and the detection of signals.
M I Posner, C R Snyder, B J Davidson. J Exp Psychol 1980
20


Comparison of two weighted integration models for the cueing task: linear and likelihood.
Steven S Shimozaki, Miguel P Eckstein, Craig K Abbey. J Vis 2003
40
47


Noise exclusion in spatial attention.
B A Dosher, Z L Lu. Psychol Sci 2000
182
19


The psychophysics of visual search.
J Palmer, P Verghese, M Pavel. Vision Res 2000
319
19

Spatial attention: different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues?
Z L Lu, B A Dosher. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2000
120
18

Precue effects in visual search: data or resource limited?
R A Kinchla, Z Chen, D Evert. Percept Psychophys 1995
58
29




A feature-integration theory of attention.
A M Treisman, G Gelade. Cogn Psychol 1980
17






The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
Miguel P Eckstein, Binh T Pham, Steven S Shimozaki. Vision Res 2004
31
48

Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality.
C J Downing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1988
347
15



Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.
Miguel P Eckstein, Matthew F Peterson, Binh T Pham, Jason A Droll. Vision Res 2009
50
28

Optimal methods for calculating classification images: weighted sums.
Richard F Murray, Patrick J Bennett, Allison B Sekuler. J Vis 2002
70
18


Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals.
P L Smith. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2000
57
22


Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors.
Miguel P Eckstein, Barbara A Drescher, Steven S Shimozaki. Psychol Sci 2006
124
13

Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours.
J M Gold, R F Murray, P J Bennett, A B Sekuler. Curr Biol 2000
135
12

Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation.
P Neri, A J Parker, C Blakemore. Nature 1999
86
13


Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: resource allocation or uncertainty reduction?
S J Luck, S A Hillyard, M Mouloua, H L Hawkins. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996
134
12


Visual attention: the past 25 years.
Marisa Carrasco. Vision Res 2011
861
12

Allocation of attention in the visual field.
C W Eriksen, Y Y Yeh. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985
626
11

Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection.
S J Luck, S A Hillyard, M Mouloua, M G Woldorff, V P Clark, H L Hawkins. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994
375
11


Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex.
S J Luck, L Chelazzi, S A Hillyard, R Desimone. J Neurophysiol 1997
11

Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons.
J H Reynolds, T Pasternak, R Desimone. Neuron 2000
710
11

Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex.
S P Gandhi, D J Heeger, G M Boynton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999
440
11


Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.
D K Lee, L Itti, C Koch, J Braun. Nat Neurosci 1999
280
10



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.