A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Randolph Blake, Kenith V Sobel, Lee A Gilroy. Neuron 2003
Times Cited: 78







List of co-cited articles
502 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Visual competition.
Randolph Blake, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
813
62

Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.
David A Leopold, Melanie Wilke, Alexander Maier, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Neurosci 2002
267
46

Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.
Leopold, Logothetis. Trends Cogn Sci 1999
460
42

Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.
Hugh R Wilson. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003
271
41



Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.
Rubén Moreno-Bote, John Rinzel, Nava Rubin. J Neurophysiol 2007
208
33

A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.
Carlo R Laing, Carson C Chow. J Comput Neurosci 2002
204
32


The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise.
Jan W Brascamp, Raymond van Ee, André J Noest, Richard H A H Jacobs, Albert V van den Berg. J Vis 2006
140
32

What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
N K Logothetis, D A Leopold, D L Sheinberg. Nature 1996
378
30

Neural bases of binocular rivalry.
Frank Tong, Ming Meng, Randolph Blake. Trends Cogn Sci 2006
384
29


Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns.
Alexander Maier, Melanie Wilke, Nikos K Logothetis, David A Leopold. Curr Biol 2003
90
24

Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain.
E D Lumer, K J Friston, G Rees. Science 1998
500
24


Sensory memory for ambiguous vision.
Joel Pearson, Jan Brascamp. Trends Cogn Sci 2008
144
24


A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?
Olivia L Carter, John D Pettigrew. Perception 2003
120
23

Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry.
Yee-Joon Kim, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki. Vision Res 2006
86
23



Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.
Jude F Mitchell, Gene R Stoner, John H Reynolds. Nature 2004
161
21

The neural bases of multistable perception.
Philipp Sterzer, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Geraint Rees. Trends Cogn Sci 2009
220
21

When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
I Kovács, T V Papathomas, M Yang, A Fehér. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996
284
20

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
20


Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.
David Alais, John Cass, Robert P O'Shea, Randolph Blake. Curr Biol 2010
99
20

Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.
F Tong, K Nakayama, J T Vaughan, N Kanwisher. Neuron 1998
524
19


Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception.
H R Wilson, R Blake, S H Lee. Nature 2001
181
19




Multistage model for binocular rivalry.
Alan W Freeman. J Neurophysiol 2005
123
19



Single units and conscious vision.
N K Logothetis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1998
227
16

Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.
S R Lehky. Proc Biol Sci 1995
88
16





Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli.
A Borsellino, A De Marco, A Allazetta, S Rinesi, B Bartolini. Kybernetik 1972
136
15

Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability.
R van Ee, L C J van Dam, G J Brouwer. Vision Res 2005
133
15

A test of Levelt's second proposition for binocular rivalry.
C J Bossink, P F Stalmeier, C M De Weert. Vision Res 1993
44
27

Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.
John-Dylan Haynes, Ralf Deichmann, Geraint Rees. Nature 2005
240
15

Attention speeds binocular rivalry.
Chris L E Paffen, David Alais, Frans A J Verstraten. Psychol Sci 2006
100
15

Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception.
Jan W Brascamp, Raymond van Ee, Wiebe R Pestman, Albert V van den Berg. J Vis 2005
85
15

A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity.
Philipp Sterzer, Andreas Kleinschmidt. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007
138
15


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.