A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

W H MCGLOTHLIN. Am J Psychol 1956
Times Cited: 24







List of co-cited articles
129 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Variance preferences in gambling.
W EDWARDS. Am J Psychol 1954
22
27


Probability-preferences in gambling.
W EDWARDS. Am J Psychol 1953
55
20


The prediction of decisions among bets.
W EDWARDS. J Exp Psychol 1955
52
16

The theory of decision making.
W EDWARDS. Psychol Bull 1954
392
16

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
A Tversky, D Kahneman. Science 1974
16

Risk dishabituation: in repeated gambling, risk is reduced following low-probability "surprising" events (wins or losses).
Heath A Demaree, Kevin J Burns, Michael A Dedonno, Edward K Agarwala, D Erik Everhart. Emotion 2012
8
50



Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings.
Barnaby Marsh, Alex Kacelnik. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002
66
12


Risk as feelings.
G F Loewenstein, E U Weber, C K Hsee, N Welch. Psychol Bull 2001
12

Subjective probability and delay.
H Rachlin, A Raineri, D Cross. J Exp Anal Behav 1991
552
12

A SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF GAMBLING BEHAVIOR.
J L MYERS, J G FORT. J Gen Psychol 1963
3
100


BOREDOM-INDUCED CHANGES IN PREFERENCES AMONG BETS.
P SLOVIC, S LICHTENSTEIN, W EDWARDS. Am J Psychol 1965
5
60

Compulsive gambling.
H K FINK. Acta Psychother Psychosom 1961
8
37

BASES FOR PREFERENCES AMONG THREE-OUTCOME BETS.
S LICHTENSTEIN. J Exp Psychol 1965
11
27






Casino gambling increases heart rate and salivary cortisol in regular gamblers.
G Meyer, B P Hauffa, M Schedlowski, C Pawlak, M A Stadler, M S Exton. Biol Psychiatry 2000
89
8

Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game.
Dominic J Barraclough, Michelle L Conroy, Daeyeol Lee. Nat Neurosci 2004
418
8


Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion.
Baba Shiv, George Loewenstein, Antoine Bechara, Hanna Damasio, Antonio R Damasio. Psychol Sci 2005
98
8

Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.
A Bechara, A R Damasio, H Damasio, S W Anderson. Cognition 1994
8


Choice in multi-alternative environments: a trial-by-trial implementation of the sequential choice model.
Marco Vasconcelos, Tiago Monteiro, Justine Aw, Alex Kacelnik. Behav Processes 2010
11
18

Toward an animal model of gambling: delay discounting and the allure of unpredictable outcomes.
Gregory J Madden, Eric E Ewan, Carla H Lagorio. J Gambl Stud 2007
32
8


Gambling rats: insight into impulsive and addictive behavior.
Catharine A Winstanley. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011
12
16

Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
S Mobini, S Body, M-Y Ho, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi, J F W Deakin, I M Anderson. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002
288
8

Las Vegas knows better.
E Crossman. Behav Anal 1983
3
66

Immediate postsession feeding reduces operant responding in rats.
John R Smethells, Andrew T Fox, Jennifer J Andrews, Mark P Reilly. J Exp Anal Behav 2012
4
50

Risk-sensitive neurons in macaque posterior cingulate cortex.
Allison N McCoy, Michael L Platt. Nat Neurosci 2005
235
8

Bee foraging in uncertain environments using predictive hebbian learning.
P R Montague, P Dayan, C Person, T J Sejnowski. Nature 1995
115
8



All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.
Levin, Schneider, Gaeth. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1998
262
8



When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity.
Abigail A Scholer, Xi Zou, Kentaro Fujita, Steven J Stroessner, E Tory Higgins. J Pers Soc Psychol 2010
41
8


Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory.
Mara Mather, Laura L Carstensen. Trends Cogn Sci 2005
825
8


Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study.
Derek M Isaacowitz, Heather A Wadlinger, Deborah Goren, Hugh R Wilson. Psychol Aging 2006
221
8


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.