A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

M L Wong, K S Chia, W M Yam, G R Teodoro, K W Lau. Clin Genet 2004
Times Cited: 57







List of co-cited articles
243 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research.
S S Wang, F Fridinger, K M Sheedy, M J Khoury. Community Genet 2001
98
49

Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.
Geraldine M McQuillan, Kathryn S Porter, Maria Agelli, Raynard Kington. Genet Med 2003
125
31

Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Scand J Public Health 2004
140
29

Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.
Jill M Pulley, Margaret M Brace, Gordon R Bernard, Dan R Masys. Cell Tissue Bank 2008
75
28

Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population.
M D Schwartz, K Rothenberg, L Joseph, J Benkendorf, C Lerman. Am J Med Genet 2001
47
23


Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?
Donna T Chen, Donald L Rosenstein, Palaniappan Muthappan, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Franklin G Miller, Ezekiel J Emanuel, David Wendler. Arch Intern Med 2005
81
17



High rate of consent to bank biologic samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience.
Thomas Malone, Paul J Catalano, Peter J O'Dwyer, Bruce Giantonio. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002
57
15


Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
182
15



Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation.
Katrina A B Goddard, K Sabina Smith, Chuhe Chen, Carmit McMullen, Cheryl Johnson. Biopreserv Biobank 2009
29
27

Factors influencing public participation in biobanking.
Mamoun Ahram, Areej Othman, Manal Shahrouri, Ebtihal Mustafa. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
43
18



Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
163
12

Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns.
Aaro Tupasela, Sinikka Sihvo, Karolna Snell, Pa Jallinoja, Arja R Aro, Elina Hemminki. Scand J Public Health 2010
50
14

Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
176
12

Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research.
Linus Johnsson, Gert Helgesson, Thorunn Rafnar, Ingibjorg Halldorsdottir, Kee-Seng Chia, Stefan Eriksson, Mats G Hansson. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
59
12

Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Michelle Wrenn, Nikki M Carroll, Heather Spencer Feigelson. J Community Genet 2013
59
12

Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
Corinna Porteri, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Elena Togni, Michael Parker. BMC Med Ethics 2014
35
20


Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions.
Laura M Beskow, Elizabeth Dean. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008
86
10

Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
107
10

Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
Christian M Simon, Jamie L'heureux, Jeffrey C Murray, Patricia Winokur, George Weiner, Elizabeth Newbury, Laura Shinkunas, Bridget Zimmerman. Genet Med 2011
107
10

Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.
J M Trauth, D Musa, L Siminoff, I K Jewell, E Ricci. J Health Soc Policy 2000
102
8

The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Arch Intern Med 2005
71
8

Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry.
Patricia G Moorman, Celette Sugg Skinner, James P Evans, Beth Newman, James R Sorenson, Brian Calingaert, Lisa Susswein, T Sydnee Crankshaw, Cathrine Hoyo, Joellen M Schildkraut. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004
66
8

Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients.
Rebecca D Pentz, Laurent Billot, David Wendler. Am J Med Genet A 2006
65
8

Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks.
Jennifer E Sanner, Lorraine Frazier. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007
33
15

DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives.
Amy L McGuire, Jennifer A Hamilton, Rebecca Lunstroth, Laurence B McCullough, Alica Goldman. Genet Med 2008
77
8

Racial and ethnic disparity in participation in DNA collection at the Atlanta site of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
Krista S Crider, Jennita Reefhuis, Alison Woomert, Margaret A Honein. Am J Epidemiol 2006
30
16

Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. Genet Med 2010
138
8

Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation.
George Gaskell, Herbert Gottweis, Johannes Starkbaum, Monica M Gerber, Jacqueline Broerse, Ursula Gottweis, Abbi Hobbs, Ilpo Helén, Maria Paschou, Karoliina Snell,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
57
8

Engaging diverse populations about biospecimen donation for cancer research.
Julie H T Dang, Elisa M Rodriguez, John S Luque, Deborah O Erwin, Cathy D Meade, Moon S Chen. J Community Genet 2014
59
8

Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.
Saskia C Sanderson, Kyle B Brothers, Nathaniel D Mercaldo, Ellen Wright Clayton, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Sharon A Aufox, Murray H Brilliant, Diego Campos, David S Carrell, John Connolly,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2017
106
8


Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data.
Donald J Willison, Karim Keshavjee, Kalpana Nair, Charlie Goldsmith, Anne M Holbrook. BMJ 2003
87
7

Using a telephone survey to acquire genetic and behavioral data related to cigarette smoking in "made-anonymous" and "registry" samples.
Lynn T Kozlowski, George P Vogler, David J Vandenbergh, Andrew A Strasser, Richard J O'Connor, Berwood A Yost. Am J Epidemiol 2002
28
14

Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews.
Atsushi Asai, Motoki Ohnishi, Etsuyo Nishigaki, Miho Sekimoto, Shunichi Fukuhara, Tsuguya Fukui. BMC Med Ethics 2002
24
16

Informed consent for genetic research on stored tissue samples.
E W Clayton, K K Steinberg, M J Khoury, E Thomson, L Andrews, M J Kahn, L M Kopelman, J O Weiss. JAMA 1995
202
7

Personal characteristics of older primary care patients who provide a buccal swab for apolipoprotein E testing and banking of genetic material: the spectrum study.
Hillary R Bogner, Marsha N Wittink, Jon F Merz, Joseph B Straton, Peter F Cronholm, Peter V Rabins, Joseph J Gallo. Community Genet 2004
38
10

Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research.
Benjamin R Bates, John A Lynch, Jennifer L Bevan, Celeste M Condit. Soc Sci Med 2005
88
7

Attitudes of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives regarding participation in research.
Dedra Buchwald, Veronica Mendoza-Jenkins, Calvin Croy, Helen McGough, Marjorie Bezdek, Paul Spicer. J Gen Intern Med 2006
42
9




Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.