Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Michael Andrykowski, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judy Much, James Dermody, Monica Marvin, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. Psychooncology 2005
Times Cited: 60
Times Cited: 60
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.
Shoshana Shiloh. J Genet Couns 2006
Shoshana Shiloh. J Genet Couns 2006
16
16
Population risk, actual risk, perceived risk, and cancer control: a discussion.
H Leventhal, K Kelly, E A Leventhal. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999
H Leventhal, K Kelly, E A Leventhal. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999
11
Patients' resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for BRCA1/2.
Andrea D Gurmankin, Susan Domchek, Jill Stopfer, Christina Fels, Katrina Armstrong. Arch Intern Med 2005
Andrea D Gurmankin, Susan Domchek, Jill Stopfer, Christina Fels, Katrina Armstrong. Arch Intern Med 2005
11
Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.
M Horowitz, N Wilner, W Alvarez. Psychosom Med 1979
M Horowitz, N Wilner, W Alvarez. Psychosom Med 1979
11
Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review.
Phyllis N Butow, Elizabeth A Lobb, Bettina Meiser, Alexandra Barratt, Katherine M Tucker. Med J Aust 2003
Phyllis N Butow, Elizabeth A Lobb, Bettina Meiser, Alexandra Barratt, Katherine M Tucker. Med J Aust 2003
11
Subjective and objective risk of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals at risk for BRCA1/2 mutations.
Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Monica Marvin, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judith Much, James Dermody, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. Genet Test 2004
Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Monica Marvin, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judith Much, James Dermody, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. Genet Test 2004
53
A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy.
Chris M R Smerecnik, Ilse Mesters, Eline Verweij, Nanne K de Vries, Hein de Vries. J Genet Couns 2009
Chris M R Smerecnik, Ilse Mesters, Eline Verweij, Nanne K de Vries, Hein de Vries. J Genet Couns 2009
11
Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: a theoretical perspective.
M Decruyenaere, G Evers-Kiebooms, M Welkenhuysen, L Denayer, E Claes. Psychooncology 2000
M Decruyenaere, G Evers-Kiebooms, M Welkenhuysen, L Denayer, E Claes. Psychooncology 2000
10
Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research.
Theresa M Marteau, John Weinman. Soc Sci Med 2006
Theresa M Marteau, John Weinman. Soc Sci Med 2006
10
Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.
Maria C Katapodi, Kathy A Lee, Noreen C Facione, Marylin J Dodd. Prev Med 2004
Maria C Katapodi, Kathy A Lee, Noreen C Facione, Marylin J Dodd. Prev Med 2004
10
The decision to test in women receiving genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Michael Andrykowski, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judie Much, James Dermody, Monica Marvin, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. J Genet Couns 2004
Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Michael Andrykowski, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judie Much, James Dermody, Monica Marvin, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. J Genet Couns 2004
31
Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening.
C Lerman, B Trock, B K Rimer, C Jepson, D Brody, A Boyce. Health Psychol 1991
C Lerman, B Trock, B K Rimer, C Jepson, D Brody, A Boyce. Health Psychol 1991
10
Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior.
C Lerman, K Kash, M Stefanek. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994
C Lerman, K Kash, M Stefanek. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994
10
Being 'at-risk' for developing cancer: cognitive representations and psychological outcomes.
Shoshana Shiloh, Erga Drori, Avi Orr-Urtreger, Eitan Friedman. J Behav Med 2009
Shoshana Shiloh, Erga Drori, Avi Orr-Urtreger, Eitan Friedman. J Behav Med 2009
27
Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions.
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, S D Sofia D Merajver. Soc Sci Med 2004
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, S D Sofia D Merajver. Soc Sci Med 2004
8
BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.
C Lerman, S Narod, K Schulman, C Hughes, A Gomez-Caminero, G Bonney, K Gold, B Trock, D Main, J Lynch,[...]. JAMA 1996
C Lerman, S Narod, K Schulman, C Hughes, A Gomez-Caminero, G Bonney, K Gold, B Trock, D Main, J Lynch,[...]. JAMA 1996
8
Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.
C Lerman, M Daly, A Masny, A Balshem. J Clin Oncol 1994
C Lerman, M Daly, A Masny, A Balshem. J Clin Oncol 1994
8
Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure.
E Claes, G Evers-Kiebooms, L Denayer, M Decruyenaere, A Boogaerts, K Philippe, E Legius. J Genet Couns 2005
E Claes, G Evers-Kiebooms, L Denayer, M Decruyenaere, A Boogaerts, K Philippe, E Legius. J Genet Couns 2005
10
What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review.
Bettina Meiser, Jane L Halliday. Soc Sci Med 2002
Bettina Meiser, Jane L Halliday. Soc Sci Med 2002
8
Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure.
Susan Michie, Jonathan A Smith, Victoria Senior, Theresa M Marteau. Am J Med Genet A 2003
Susan Michie, Jonathan A Smith, Victoria Senior, Theresa M Marteau. Am J Med Genet A 2003
10
Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004
Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004
8
The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.
Lori d'Agincourt-Canning. J Genet Couns 2005
Lori d'Agincourt-Canning. J Genet Couns 2005
8
Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.
D Ford, D F Easton, M Stratton, S Narod, D Goldgar, P Devilee, D T Bishop, B Weber, G Lenoir, J Chang-Claude,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 1998
D Ford, D F Easton, M Stratton, S Narod, D Goldgar, P Devilee, D T Bishop, B Weber, G Lenoir, J Chang-Claude,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 1998
8
Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.
A Antoniou, P D P Pharoah, S Narod, H A Risch, J E Eyfjord, J L Hopper, N Loman, H Olsson, O Johannsson, A Borg,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2003
A Antoniou, P D P Pharoah, S Narod, H A Risch, J E Eyfjord, J L Hopper, N Loman, H Olsson, O Johannsson, A Borg,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2003
8
A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.
K Brain, P Norman, J Gray, C Rogers, R Mansel, P Harper. Br J Cancer 2002
K Brain, P Norman, J Gray, C Rogers, R Mansel, P Harper. Br J Cancer 2002
8
Feeling at risk: how women interpret their familial breast cancer risk.
Sandra van Dijk, Wilma Otten, Christi J van Asperen, Danielle R M Timmermans, Aad Tibben, Moniek W Zoeteweij, Sylvia Silberg, Martijn H Breuning, Job Kievit. Am J Med Genet A 2004
Sandra van Dijk, Wilma Otten, Christi J van Asperen, Danielle R M Timmermans, Aad Tibben, Moniek W Zoeteweij, Sylvia Silberg, Martijn H Breuning, Job Kievit. Am J Med Genet A 2004
20
The brief illness perception questionnaire.
Elizabeth Broadbent, Keith J Petrie, Jodie Main, John Weinman. J Psychosom Res 2006
Elizabeth Broadbent, Keith J Petrie, Jodie Main, John Weinman. J Psychosom Res 2006
8
Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature.
Bettina Meiser. Psychooncology 2005
Bettina Meiser. Psychooncology 2005
8
Genetic counselling and the intention to undergo prophylactic mastectomy: effects of a breast cancer risk assessment.
S van Dijk, W Otten, M W Zoeteweij, D R M Timmermans, C J van Asperen, M H Breuning, R A E M Tollenaar, J Kievit. Br J Cancer 2003
S van Dijk, W Otten, M W Zoeteweij, D R M Timmermans, C J van Asperen, M H Breuning, R A E M Tollenaar, J Kievit. Br J Cancer 2003
9
Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
R T Croyle, C Lerman. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999
R T Croyle, C Lerman. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999
8
Changes in psychological distress after cancer genetic counselling: a comparison of affected and unaffected women.
A Bish, S Sutton, C Jacobs, S Levene, A Ramirez, S Hodgson. Br J Cancer 2002
A Bish, S Sutton, C Jacobs, S Levene, A Ramirez, S Hodgson. Br J Cancer 2002
8
A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
8
Cancer genetics knowledge and beliefs and receipt of results in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals receiving counseling for BRCA1/2 mutations.
Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Monica Marvin, Deborah Toppmeyer, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. Cancer Control 2004
Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Monica Marvin, Deborah Toppmeyer, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. Cancer Control 2004
17
Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.
D F Easton, D Ford, D T Bishop. Am J Hum Genet 1995
D F Easton, D Ford, D T Bishop. Am J Hum Genet 1995
8
The common sense model of self-regulation and psychological adjustment to predictive genetic testing: a prospective study.
Iris van Oostrom, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Annette H J T Bröcker-Vriends, Christi J van Asperen, Rolf H Sijmons, Caroline Seynaeve, Arthur R Van Gool, Jan G M Klijn, Aad Tibben. Psychooncology 2007
Iris van Oostrom, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Annette H J T Bröcker-Vriends, Christi J van Asperen, Rolf H Sijmons, Caroline Seynaeve, Arthur R Van Gool, Jan G M Klijn, Aad Tibben. Psychooncology 2007
14
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
. J Clin Oncol 2003
. J Clin Oncol 2003
8
How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.
Stephanie Sivell, Glyn Elwyn, Clara L Gaff, Angus J Clarke, Rachel Iredale, Chris Shaw, Joanna Dundon, Hazel Thornton, Adrian Edwards. J Genet Couns 2008
Stephanie Sivell, Glyn Elwyn, Clara L Gaff, Angus J Clarke, Rachel Iredale, Chris Shaw, Joanna Dundon, Hazel Thornton, Adrian Edwards. J Genet Couns 2008
8
Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications.
Caryn Lerman, Robert T Croyle, Kenneth P Tercyak, Heidi Hamann. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002
Caryn Lerman, Robert T Croyle, Kenneth P Tercyak, Heidi Hamann. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002
6
Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.
M Broadstock, S Michie, T Marteau. Eur J Hum Genet 2000
M Broadstock, S Michie, T Marteau. Eur J Hum Genet 2000
6
Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations.
N A Press, Y Yasui, S Reynolds, S J Durfy, W Burke. Am J Med Genet 2001
N A Press, Y Yasui, S Reynolds, S J Durfy, W Burke. Am J Med Genet 2001
6
Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings.
R T Croyle, K R Smith, J R Botkin, B Baty, J Nash. Health Psychol 1997
R T Croyle, K R Smith, J R Botkin, B Baty, J Nash. Health Psychol 1997
6
Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box.
B B Biesecker, K F Peters. Am J Med Genet 2001
B B Biesecker, K F Peters. Am J Med Genet 2001
6
Predictive genetic testing: high risk expectations in the face of low risk information.
Susan Michie, John Weinman, Julie Miller, Veronica Collins, Jane Halliday, Theresa M Marteau. J Behav Med 2002
Susan Michie, John Weinman, Julie Miller, Veronica Collins, Jane Halliday, Theresa M Marteau. J Behav Med 2002
10
Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.
Erna Claes, Lieve Denayer, Gerry Evers-Kiebooms, Andrea Boogaerts, Eric Legius. Patient Educ Couns 2004
Erna Claes, Lieve Denayer, Gerry Evers-Kiebooms, Andrea Boogaerts, Eric Legius. Patient Educ Couns 2004
6
Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes.
E A Lobb, P N Butow, A Barratt, B Meiser, C Gaff, M A Young, E Haan, G Suthers, M Gattas, K Tucker. Br J Cancer 2004
E A Lobb, P N Butow, A Barratt, B Meiser, C Gaff, M A Young, E Haan, G Suthers, M Gattas, K Tucker. Br J Cancer 2004
6
7
Analyzing the process and content of genetic counseling in familial breast cancer consultations.
Phyllis N Butow, Elizabeth A Lobb. J Genet Couns 2004
Phyllis N Butow, Elizabeth A Lobb. J Genet Couns 2004
7
Women's preferences and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes.
E A Lobb, P N Butow, B Meiser, A Barratt, C Gaff, M A Young, J Kirk, M Gattas, M Gleeson, K Tucker. J Med Genet 2003
E A Lobb, P N Butow, B Meiser, A Barratt, C Gaff, M A Young, J Kirk, M Gattas, M Gleeson, K Tucker. J Med Genet 2003
9
Do women understand the odds? Risk perceptions and recall of risk information in women with a family history of breast cancer.
Penelope Hopwood, Anthony Howell, Fiona Lalloo, Gareth Evans. Community Genet 2003
Penelope Hopwood, Anthony Howell, Fiona Lalloo, Gareth Evans. Community Genet 2003
12
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.