A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Interocular suppression is gated by interocular feature matching.
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess. Vision Res 2005
Times Cited: 38






Login to export Results
Don't have an account? Register here

List of co-cited articles
321 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin.
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess. J Vis 2004
80
21
55

Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.
Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson, Daniel H Baker. J Vis 2006
180
21
55

Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.
D H Baker, T S Meese, R J Summers. Neuroscience 2007
80
16
42

Contrast masking in human vision.
G E Legge, J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am 1980
627
14
36

Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex.
D J Heeger. Vis Neurosci 1992
1126
12
31

Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions.
G E Legge. J Opt Soc Am 1979
121
12
31

A gain-control theory of binocular combination.
Jian Ding, George Sperling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006
171
11
28

Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model.
J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994
370
11
28

Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese. Vision Res 2007
65
10
26

Intracortical origins of interocular suppression in the visual cortex.
Frank Sengpiel, Vasily Vorobyov. J Neurosci 2005
57
9
23

Cross-orientation suppression: monoptic and dichoptic mechanisms are different.
Baowang Li, Matthew R Peterson, Jeffrey K Thompson, Thang Duong, Ralph D Freeman. J Neurophysiol 2005
46
9
23

Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness.
Stephen L Macknik, Susana Martinez-Conde. J Cogn Neurosci 2004
59
8
21

Binocular contrast summation--I. Detection and discrimination.
G E Legge. Vision Res 1984
138
8
21

Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.
Tim S Meese, David J Holmes. Proc Biol Sci 2007
56
8
21

Visual competition.
Randolph Blake, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
808
8
21

Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.
D G Pelli. J Opt Soc Am A 1985
515
7
18

Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.
F W Campbell, D G Green. Nature 1965
303
7
18

A neural theory of binocular rivalry.
R Blake. Psychol Rev 1989
428
7
18

Area summation and masking.
Tim S Meese. J Vis 2004
38
7
18

Binocular cross-orientation suppression in the cat's striate cortex.
G A Walker, I Ohzawa, R D Freeman. J Neurophysiol 1998
41
7
18

Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson. Spat Vis 2007
56
7
18

The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry.
R Blake, K Boothroyd. Percept Psychophys 1985
58
7
18

Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation.
C W Tyler, C C Chen. Vision Res 2000
112
6
15

Grating and plaid masks indicate linear summation in a contrast gain pool.
David J Holmes, Tim S Meese. J Vis 2004
35
6
17

Stereo matching precedes dichoptic masking.
S P McKee, M J Bravo, D G Taylor, G E Legge. Vision Res 1994
36
6
16

Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision.
J M Foley, G E Legge. Vision Res 1981
182
6
15

Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry.
F Sengpiel, C Blakemore, R Harrad. Vision Res 1995
110
6
15

Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision.
Yury Petrov, Matteo Carandini, Suzanne McKee. J Neurosci 2005
137
6
15

Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.
Farshad Moradi, David J Heeger. J Vis 2009
79
6
15

Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity.
S Pardhan, J Gilchrist. Doc Ophthalmol 1992
57
5
13

The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination.
R J Snowden, S T Hammett. Vision Res 1998
119
5
13

Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17.
F Sengpiel, R J Baddeley, T C Freeman, R Harrad, C Blakemore. Vision Res 1998
105
5
13

Size matters, but not for everyone: individual differences for contrast discrimination.
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess, Cristyn B Williams. J Vis 2005
30
5
16

The binocular combination of chromatic contrast.
David R Simmons. Perception 2005
24
5
20

Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection.
J Nachmias, R V Sansbury. Vision Res 1974
330
5
13

Binocular contrast summation--II. Quadratic summation.
G E Legge. Vision Res 1984
132
5
13

SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION.
G B WETHERILL, H LEVITT. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1965
897
5
13

Early and late mechanisms of surround suppression in striate cortex of macaque.
Ben S Webb, Neel T Dhruv, Samuel G Solomon, Chris Tailby, Peter Lennie. J Neurosci 2005
168
5
13

Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex.
A B Bonds. Vis Neurosci 1989
385
5
13

Suppression without inhibition in visual cortex.
Tobe C B Freeman, Séverine Durand, Daniel C Kiper, Matteo Carandini. Neuron 2002
153
5
13

Binocular interactions in normal and anomalous binocular vision.
D M Levi, R S Harwerth, E L Smith. Doc Ophthalmol 1980
53
5
13

Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults, and in adults with amblyopia.
Indu Vedamurthy, Catherine M Suttle, Jack Alexander, Lisa J Asper. Vision Res 2007
23
5
21

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
10295
5
13

Binocularity and visual search.
J M Wolfe, S L Franzel. Percept Psychophys 1988
52
5
13

Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.
Tim S Meese, Robert J Summers. J Vis 2009
46
5
13

On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry.
Daniel H Baker, Erich W Graf. Vision Res 2009
39
5
13

Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess. Vision Res 2008
113
5
13

A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems.
Indu Vedamurthy, Catherine M Suttle, Jack Alexander, Lisa J Asper. Vision Res 2008
17
5
29

Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Behzad Mansouri, Robert F Hess. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007
137
5
13

Binocular vision.
Randolph Blake, Hugh Wilson. Vision Res 2011
112
5
13


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.

Longstocking, LLC. © 2021
Home | About Us | FAQs | Terms & Privacy