Greg Hajcak, Clay B Holroyd, Jason S Moser, Robert F Simons. Psychophysiology 2005
Times Cited: 335
Times Cited: 335
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.
Clay B Holroyd, Michael G H Coles. Psychol Rev 2002
Clay B Holroyd, Michael G H Coles. Psychol Rev 2002
64
Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain.
Nick Yeung, Alan G Sanfey. J Neurosci 2004
Nick Yeung, Alan G Sanfey. J Neurosci 2004
55
The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses.
William J Gehring, Adrian R Willoughby. Science 2002
William J Gehring, Adrian R Willoughby. Science 2002
54
It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks.
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Psychophysiology 2007
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Psychophysiology 2007
49
Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.
W H Miltner, C H Braun, M G Coles. J Cogn Neurosci 1997
W H Miltner, C H Braun, M G Coles. J Cogn Neurosci 1997
47
The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation.
Yan Wu, Xiaolin Zhou. Brain Res 2009
Yan Wu, Xiaolin Zhou. Brain Res 2009
38
The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes.
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Biol Psychol 2006
Greg Hajcak, Jason S Moser, Clay B Holroyd, Robert F Simons. Biol Psychol 2006
34
The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression.
Greg Hajcak Proudfit. Psychophysiology 2015
Greg Hajcak Proudfit. Psychophysiology 2015
33
Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Gary Aston-Jones, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychol Bull 2005
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Gary Aston-Jones, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychol Bull 2005
28
ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.
Nick Yeung, Clay B Holroyd, Jonathan D Cohen. Cereb Cortex 2005
Nick Yeung, Clay B Holroyd, Jonathan D Cohen. Cereb Cortex 2005
26
Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance.
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Clay B Holroyd, Nisan Mol, Michael G H Coles. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Clay B Holroyd, Nisan Mol, Michael G H Coles. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004
26
EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.
Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig. J Neurosci Methods 2004
Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig. J Neurosci Methods 2004
26
The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.
Clay B Holroyd, Kaivon L Pakzad-Vaezi, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2008
Clay B Holroyd, Kaivon L Pakzad-Vaezi, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2008
26
Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.
Matthew M Walsh, John R Anderson. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012
Matthew M Walsh, John R Anderson. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012
25
Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning.
René San Martín. Front Hum Neurosci 2012
René San Martín. Front Hum Neurosci 2012
25
The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning and network organization.
Tobias U Hauser, Reto Iannaccone, Philipp Stämpfli, Renate Drechsler, Daniel Brandeis, Susanne Walitza, Silvia Brem. Neuroimage 2014
Tobias U Hauser, Reto Iannaccone, Philipp Stämpfli, Renate Drechsler, Daniel Brandeis, Susanne Walitza, Silvia Brem. Neuroimage 2014
25
Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.
Christian Bellebaum, Irene Daum. Eur J Neurosci 2008
Christian Bellebaum, Irene Daum. Eur J Neurosci 2008
24
A neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages.
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Psychol Bull 2015
Thomas D Sambrook, Jeremy Goslin. Psychol Bull 2015
24
Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300.
Atsushi Sato, Asako Yasuda, Hideki Ohira, Kaori Miyawaki, Masami Nishikawa, Hiroaki Kumano, Tomifusa Kuboki. Neuroreport 2005
Atsushi Sato, Asako Yasuda, Hideki Ohira, Kaori Miyawaki, Masami Nishikawa, Hiroaki Kumano, Tomifusa Kuboki. Neuroreport 2005
23
Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra.
Michael X Cohen, Christian E Elger, Charan Ranganath. Neuroimage 2007
Michael X Cohen, Christian E Elger, Charan Ranganath. Neuroimage 2007
23
The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.
Clay B Holroyd, Greg Hajcak, Jeff T Larsen. Brain Res 2006
Clay B Holroyd, Greg Hajcak, Jeff T Larsen. Brain Res 2006
20
Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential.
Clay B Holroyd, Sander Nieuwenhuis, Nick Yeung, Jonathan D Cohen. Neuroreport 2003
Clay B Holroyd, Sander Nieuwenhuis, Nick Yeung, Jonathan D Cohen. Neuroreport 2003
20
Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task.
Clay B Holroyd, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2007
Clay B Holroyd, Olave E Krigolson. Psychophysiology 2007
20
Rapid electrophysiological brain responses are influenced by both valence and magnitude of monetary rewards.
Julia P Goyer, Marty G Woldorff, Scott A Huettel. J Cogn Neurosci 2008
Julia P Goyer, Marty G Woldorff, Scott A Huettel. J Cogn Neurosci 2008
19
Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity.
Dan Foti, Anna Weinberg, Joseph Dien, Greg Hajcak. Hum Brain Mapp 2011
Dan Foti, Anna Weinberg, Joseph Dien, Greg Hajcak. Hum Brain Mapp 2011
19
Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning.
Henry W Chase, Rachel Swainson, Lucy Durham, Laura Benham, Roshan Cools. J Cogn Neurosci 2011
Henry W Chase, Rachel Swainson, Lucy Durham, Laura Benham, Roshan Cools. J Cogn Neurosci 2011
18
To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation.
Zhiheng Zhou, Rongjun Yu, Xiaolin Zhou. Neuropsychologia 2010
Zhiheng Zhou, Rongjun Yu, Xiaolin Zhou. Neuropsychologia 2010
17
The feedback-related negativity signals salience prediction errors, not reward prediction errors.
Deborah Talmi, Ryan Atkinson, Wael El-Deredy. J Neurosci 2013
Deborah Talmi, Ryan Atkinson, Wael El-Deredy. J Neurosci 2013
17
Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment.
Clay B Holroyd, Jeff T Larsen, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychophysiology 2004
Clay B Holroyd, Jeff T Larsen, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychophysiology 2004
17
Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: an ERP study.
Yue Leng, Xiaolin Zhou. Neuropsychologia 2010
Yue Leng, Xiaolin Zhou. Neuropsychologia 2010
17
Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
Daniela M Pfabigan, Johanna Alexopoulos, Herbert Bauer, Uta Sailer. Psychophysiology 2011
Daniela M Pfabigan, Johanna Alexopoulos, Herbert Bauer, Uta Sailer. Psychophysiology 2011
16
It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
Christian Bellebaum, David Polezzi, Irene Daum. Neuropsychologia 2010
Christian Bellebaum, David Polezzi, Irene Daum. Neuropsychologia 2010
14
Reward positivity elicited by predictive cues.
Clay B Holroyd, Olav E Krigolson, Seung Lee. Neuroreport 2011
Clay B Holroyd, Olav E Krigolson, Seung Lee. Neuroreport 2011
14
Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring.
Markus Ullsperger, Adrian G Fischer, Roland Nigbur, Tanja Endrass. Trends Cogn Sci 2014
Markus Ullsperger, Adrian G Fischer, Roland Nigbur, Tanja Endrass. Trends Cogn Sci 2014
14
When things are better or worse than expected: the medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources.
Geoffrey F Potts, Laura E Martin, Philip Burton, P Read Montague. J Cogn Neurosci 2006
Geoffrey F Potts, Laura E Martin, Philip Burton, P Read Montague. J Cogn Neurosci 2006
14
Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor.
William H Alexander, Joshua W Brown. Nat Neurosci 2011
William H Alexander, Joshua W Brown. Nat Neurosci 2011
14
The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
Luisa Kreussel, Johannes Hewig, Nora Kretschmer, Holger Hecht, Michael G H Coles, Wolfgang H R Miltner. Psychophysiology 2012
Luisa Kreussel, Johannes Hewig, Nora Kretschmer, Holger Hecht, Michael G H Coles, Wolfgang H R Miltner. Psychophysiology 2012
16
13
Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations.
Flavio T P Oliveira, John J McDonald, David Goodman. J Cogn Neurosci 2007
Flavio T P Oliveira, John J McDonald, David Goodman. J Cogn Neurosci 2007
13
Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes.
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Heleen A Slagter, Niels J Alting von Geusau, Dirk J Heslenfeld, Clay B Holroyd. Eur J Neurosci 2005
Sander Nieuwenhuis, Heleen A Slagter, Niels J Alting von Geusau, Dirk J Heslenfeld, Clay B Holroyd. Eur J Neurosci 2005
12
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
12
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.
G Gratton, M G Coles, E Donchin. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983
G Gratton, M G Coles, E Donchin. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983
12
Dissociated roles of the anterior cingulate cortex in reward and conflict processing as revealed by the feedback error-related negativity and N200.
Travis E Baker, Clay B Holroyd. Biol Psychol 2011
Travis E Baker, Clay B Holroyd. Biol Psychol 2011
12
Neural correlates of feedback processing in decision-making under risk.
Beate Schuermann, Tanja Endrass, Norbert Kathmann. Front Hum Neurosci 2012
Beate Schuermann, Tanja Endrass, Norbert Kathmann. Front Hum Neurosci 2012
22
Ventral striatal and medial prefrontal BOLD activation is correlated with reward-related electrocortical activity: a combined ERP and fMRI study.
Joshua M Carlson, Dan Foti, Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi, Eddie Harmon-Jones, Greg Hajcak. Neuroimage 2011
Joshua M Carlson, Dan Foti, Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi, Eddie Harmon-Jones, Greg Hajcak. Neuroimage 2011
11
The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex.
Nicola K Ferdinand, Axel Mecklinger, Jutta Kray, William J Gehring. J Neurosci 2012
Nicola K Ferdinand, Axel Mecklinger, Jutta Kray, William J Gehring. J Neurosci 2012
11
Reinforcement learning signals predict future decisions.
Michael X Cohen, Charan Ranganath. J Neurosci 2007
Michael X Cohen, Charan Ranganath. J Neurosci 2007
11
A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task.
Michael P I Becker, Alexander M Nitsch, Wolfgang H R Miltner, Thomas Straube. J Neurosci 2014
Michael P I Becker, Alexander M Nitsch, Wolfgang H R Miltner, Thomas Straube. J Neurosci 2014
11
Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning.
James F Cavanagh, Michael J Frank, Theresa J Klein, John J B Allen. Neuroimage 2010
James F Cavanagh, Michael J Frank, Theresa J Klein, John J B Allen. Neuroimage 2010
10
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.