A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Andreas Voss, Klaus Rothermund, Jochen Voss. Mem Cognit 2004
Times Cited: 254







List of co-cited articles
553 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.
Roger Ratcliff, Philip L Smith, Scott D Brown, Gail McKoon. Trends Cogn Sci 2016
429
37

HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python.
Thomas V Wiecki, Imri Sofer, Michael J Frank. Front Neuroinform 2013
336
31


Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction.
Andreas Voss, Markus Nagler, Veronika Lerche. Exp Psychol 2013
187
29

Fast-dm: a free program for efficient diffusion model analysis.
Andreas Voss, Jochen Voss. Behav Res Methods 2007
202
24


An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy.
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Han L J van der Maas, Raoul P P P Grasman. Psychon Bull Rev 2007
291
20

The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.
Rafal Bogacz, Eric Brown, Jeff Moehlis, Philip Holmes, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychol Rev 2006
793
16



Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: a tutorial based on fast-dm-30.
Andreas Voss, Jochen Voss, Veronika Lerche. Front Psychol 2015
85
17




The neural basis of decision making.
Joshua I Gold, Michael N Shadlen. Annu Rev Neurosci 2007
14

Bias in the brain: a diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff.
Martijn J Mulder, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Roger Ratcliff, Wouter Boekel, Birte U Forstmann. J Neurosci 2012
192
14


A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task.
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Roger Ratcliff, Pablo Gomez, Gail McKoon. J Mem Lang 2008
153
13


Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times.
Joachim Vandekerckhove, Francis Tuerlinckx, Michael D Lee. Psychol Methods 2011
124
12

Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.
B U Forstmann, R Ratcliff, E-J Wagenmakers. Annu Rev Psychol 2016
172
12

Decomposing bias in different types of simple decisions.
Corey N White, Russell A Poldrack. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2014
60
18

The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.
Babette Rae, Andrew Heathcote, Chris Donkin, Lee Averell, Scott Brown. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2014
91
12

The Quality of Response Time Data Inference: A Blinded, Collaborative Assessment of the Validity of Cognitive Models.
Gilles Dutilh, Jeffrey Annis, Scott D Brown, Peter Cassey, Nathan J Evans, Raoul P P P Grasman, Guy E Hawkins, Andrew Heathcote, William R Holmes, Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos,[...]. Psychon Bull Rev 2019
44
25


A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.
Roger Ratcliff, Pablo Gomez, Gail McKoon. Psychol Rev 2004
315
11

A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions.
Brandon M Turner, Per B Sederberg, Scott D Brown, Mark Steyvers. Psychol Methods 2013
94
10

Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model.
Florian Schmitz, Andreas Voss. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2012
55
18

Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions.
Philip L Smith, Roger Ratcliff. Trends Neurosci 2004
623
9

Revisiting the evidence for collapsing boundaries and urgency signals in perceptual decision-making.
Guy E Hawkins, Birte U Forstmann, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Roger Ratcliff, Scott D Brown. J Neurosci 2015
114
9

Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes?
Chris Donkin, Scott Brown, Andrew Heathcote, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. Psychon Bull Rev 2011
86
10

Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure.
Birte U Forstmann, Gilles Dutilh, Scott Brown, Jane Neumann, D Yves von Cramon, K Richard Ridderinkhof, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008
377
9


Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.
Florian Schmiedek, Klaus Oberauer, Oliver Wilhelm, Heinz-Martin Süss, Werner W Wittmann. J Exp Psychol Gen 2007
256
9

The overconstraint of response time models: rethinking the scaling problem.
Chris Donkin, Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote. Psychon Bull Rev 2009
74
10


The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects.
Don van Ravenzwaaij, Chris Donkin, Joachim Vandekerckhove. Psychon Bull Rev 2017
45
17

Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions.
Roger Ratcliff, Anjali Thapar, Gail McKoon. Psychon Bull Rev 2006
105
8

Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions.
Rolf Ulrich, Hannes Schröter, Hartmut Leuthold, Teresa Birngruber. Cogn Psychol 2015
113
8

Decision-making with multiple alternatives.
Anne K Churchland, Roozbeh Kiani, Michael N Shadlen. Nat Neurosci 2008
372
8


Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks.
Roger Ratcliff, Anjali Thapar, Gail McKoon. Cogn Psychol 2010
127
8

Decision making as a window on cognition.
Michael N Shadlen, Roozbeh Kiani. Neuron 2013
233
7

How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making.
Ulrike Basten, Guido Biele, Hauke R Heekeren, Christian J Fiebach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010
227
7

Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG.
Roger Ratcliff, Marios G Philiastides, Paul Sajda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009
162
7

The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task.
R Ratcliff, A Thapar, G McKoon. Psychol Aging 2001
179
7


Process components of the Implicit Association Test: a diffusion-model analysis.
Karl Christoph Klauer, Andreas Voss, Florian Schmitz, Sarah Teige-Mocigemba. J Pers Soc Psychol 2007
74
9

A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect.
Gilles Dutilh, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Francis Tuerlinckx, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. Psychon Bull Rev 2009
68
10


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.