A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Jan W Brascamp, Raymond van Ee, Wiebe R Pestman, Albert V van den Berg. J Vis 2005
Times Cited: 87







List of co-cited articles
684 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Visual competition.
Randolph Blake, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
824
59

Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.
Leopold, Logothetis. Trends Cogn Sci 1999
468
48


Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.
Hugh R Wilson. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003
273
34

Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli.
A Borsellino, A De Marco, A Allazetta, S Rinesi, B Bartolini. Kybernetik 1972
136
32


What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
N K Logothetis, D A Leopold, D L Sheinberg. Nature 1996
381
29

A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?
Olivia L Carter, John D Pettigrew. Perception 2003
120
29


Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.
Rubén Moreno-Bote, John Rinzel, Nava Rubin. J Neurophysiol 2007
212
28


A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.
Carlo R Laing, Carson C Chow. J Comput Neurosci 2002
205
27

Neural bases of binocular rivalry.
Frank Tong, Ming Meng, Randolph Blake. Trends Cogn Sci 2006
394
27

Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.
David A Leopold, Melanie Wilke, Alexander Maier, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Neurosci 2002
268
27


Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability.
R van Ee, L C J van Dam, G J Brouwer. Vision Res 2005
136
25


The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
24

The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise.
Jan W Brascamp, Raymond van Ee, André J Noest, Richard H A H Jacobs, Albert V van den Berg. J Vis 2006
141
24




Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain.
E D Lumer, K J Friston, G Rees. Science 1998
504
21

Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception.
Y H Zhou, J B Gao, K D White, I Merk, K Yao. Biol Cybern 2004
59
32

The neural bases of multistable perception.
Philipp Sterzer, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Geraint Rees. Trends Cogn Sci 2009
224
21



Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.
S R Lehky. Proc Biol Sci 1995
88
20

Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry.
Yee-Joon Kim, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki. Vision Res 2006
86
20

Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception.
H R Wilson, R Blake, S H Lee. Nature 2001
183
19


When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
I Kovács, T V Papathomas, M Yang, A Fehér. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996
288
18

Attention speeds binocular rivalry.
Chris L E Paffen, David Alais, Frans A J Verstraten. Psychol Sci 2006
101
18




Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry.
Sang Chul Chong, Duje Tadin, Randolph Blake. J Vis 2005
117
16

Lateral neural model of binocular rivalry.
Lars Stollenwerk, Mathias Bode. Neural Comput 2003
36
38



A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity.
Philipp Sterzer, Andreas Kleinschmidt. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007
138
16

Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision.
P C Klink, R van Ee, M M Nijs, G J Brouwer, A J Noest, R J A van Wezel. J Vis 2008
74
18

General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry.
P Christiaan Klink, Raymond van Ee, Richard J A van Wezel. PLoS One 2008
48
29

Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: an epistemological review.
Jakob Hohwy, Andreas Roepstorff, Karl Friston. Cognition 2008
192
16




Multistage model for binocular rivalry.
Alan W Freeman. J Neurophysiol 2005
123
14

Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry.
Tsutomu Murata, Nobuyuki Matsui, Satoru Miyauchi, Yuki Kakita, Toshio Yanagida. Neuroreport 2003
46
28

Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.
David Alais, John Cass, Robert P O'Shea, Randolph Blake. Curr Biol 2010
99
14


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.