A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

John P A Ioannidis. PLoS Med 2005
Times Cited: 4050







List of co-cited articles
179 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.
Katherine S Button, John P A Ioannidis, Claire Mokrysz, Brian A Nosek, Jonathan Flint, Emma S J Robinson, Marcus R Munafò. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013
18




A manifesto for reproducible science.
Marcus R Munafò, Brian A Nosek, Dorothy V M Bishop, Katherine S Button, Christopher D Chambers, Nathalie Percie du Sert, Uri Simonsohn, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J Ware, John P A Ioannidis. Nat Hum Behav 2017
479
9

Redefine statistical significance.
Daniel J Benjamin, James O Berger, Magnus Johannesson, Brian A Nosek, E-J Wagenmakers, Richard Berk, Kenneth A Bollen, Björn Brembs, Lawrence Brown, Colin Camerer,[...]. Nat Hum Behav 2018
736
8

The preregistration revolution.
Brian A Nosek, Charles R Ebersole, Alexander C DeHaven, David T Mellor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018
358
6


Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.
Leslie K John, George Loewenstein, Drazen Prelec. Psychol Sci 2012
508
6


Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.
Sander Greenland, Stephen J Senn, Kenneth J Rothman, John B Carlin, Charles Poole, Steven N Goodman, Douglas G Altman. Eur J Epidemiol 2016
886
5


The natural selection of bad science.
Paul E Smaldino, Richard McElreath. R Soc Open Sci 2016
190
5

Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics.
Colin F Camerer, Anna Dreber, Eskil Forsell, Teck-Hua Ho, Jürgen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Johan Almenberg, Adam Altmejd, Taizan Chan,[...]. Science 2016
152
5

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. PLoS Med 2009
4

The Fragility Index in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Critical Care Trials.
Elliott E Ridgeon, Paul J Young, Rinaldo Bellomo, Marta Mucchetti, Rosalba Lembo, Giovanni Landoni. Crit Care Med 2016
153
4

The fickle P value generates irreproducible results.
Lewis G Halsey, Douglas Curran-Everett, Sarah L Vowler, Gordon B Drummond. Nat Methods 2015
320
4


A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research.
Story C Landis, Susan G Amara, Khusru Asadullah, Chris P Austin, Robi Blumenstein, Eileen W Bradley, Ronald G Crystal, Robert B Darnell, Robert J Ferrante, Howard Fillit,[...]. Nature 2012
789
4


P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.
Uri Simonsohn, Leif D Nelson, Joseph P Simmons. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014
401
4

Scientists rise up against statistical significance.
Valentin Amrhein, Sander Greenland, Blake McShane. Nature 2019
898
4

Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Ruud Wetzels, Denny Borsboom, Han L J van der Maas. J Pers Soc Psychol 2011
314
4

What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
T D Stanley, Evan C Carter, Hristos Doucouliagos. Psychol Bull 2018
59
6


Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.
Colin F Camerer, Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, Teck-Hua Ho, Jürgen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Gideon Nave, Brian A Nosek, Thomas Pfeiffer,[...]. Nat Hum Behav 2018
252
4

Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.
Malcolm R Macleod, Susan Michie, Ian Roberts, Ulrich Dirnagl, Iain Chalmers, John P A Ioannidis, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, An-Wen Chan, Paul Glasziou. Lancet 2014
524
4

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.
Paul Glasziou, Douglas G Altman, Patrick Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Mike Clarke, Steven Julious, Susan Michie, David Moher, Elizabeth Wager. Lancet 2014
701
4

Social science. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer.
Annie Franco, Neil Malhotra, Gabor Simonovits. Science 2014
258
4

Why most discovered true associations are inflated.
John P A Ioannidis. Epidemiology 2008
688
4

G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
4


The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index.
Michael Walsh, Sadeesh K Srinathan, Daniel F McAuley, Marko Mrkobrada, Oren Levine, Christine Ribic, Amber O Molnar, Neil D Dattani, Andrew Burke, Gordon Guyatt,[...]. J Clin Epidemiol 2014
337
3

The fragility of trial results involves more than statistical significance alone.
Stephen D Walter, Lehana Thabane, Matthias Briel. J Clin Epidemiol 2020
18
16

A critique of the fragility index.
David Bomze, Tomer Meirson. Lancet Oncol 2019
16
18


A critique of the fragility index.
Alexandra Desnoyers, Michelle B Nadler, Brooke E Wilson, Eitan Amir. Lancet Oncol 2019
11
27

Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research.
Russell A Poldrack, Chris I Baker, Joke Durnez, Krzysztof J Gorgolewski, Paul M Matthews, Marcus R Munafò, Thomas E Nichols, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Edward Vul, Tal Yarkoni. Nat Rev Neurosci 2017
573
3


How to make more published research true.
John P A Ioannidis. PLoS Med 2014
369
3


Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined.
Harold Pashler, Christine R Harris. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012
215
3

SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.
B A Nosek, G Alter, G C Banks, D Borsboom, S D Bowman, S J Breckler, S Buck, C D Chambers, G Chin, G Christensen,[...]. Science 2015
652
3


Finding the power to reduce publication bias.
T D Stanley, Hristos Doucouliagos, John P A Ioannidis. Stat Med 2017
17
17




The generalizability crisis.
Tal Yarkoni. Behav Brain Sci 2020
73
4



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.