A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Abigail L Rose, Nikki Peters, Judy A Shea, Katrina Armstrong. Community Genet 2005
Times Cited: 34







List of co-cited articles
189 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.
Diana S Catz, Nancy S Green, Jonathan N Tobin, Michele A Lloyd-Puryear, Penny Kyler, Ann Umemoto, Jennifer Cernoch, Roxane Brown, Fredericka Wolman. Community Genet 2005
109
29

The association between race and attitudes about predictive genetic testing.
Nikki Peters, Abigail Rose, Katrina Armstrong. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004
95
23

Knowledge, attitudes, and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among women with early-onset breast cancer.
Nikki Peters, Susan M Domchek, Abigail Rose, Rachael Polis, Jill Stopfer, Katrina Armstrong. Genet Test 2005
39
20

The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States.
Abigail Rose, Nikki Peters, Judy A Shea, Katrina Armstrong. J Health Commun 2005
50
17

Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research.
Benjamin R Bates, John A Lynch, Jennifer L Bevan, Celeste M Condit. Soc Sci Med 2005
88
17

Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing.
Eleanor Singer, Toni Antonucci, John Van Hoewyk. Genet Test 2004
127
17

Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population.
Emily A Peterson, Kara J Milliron, Karen E Lewis, Susan D Goold, Sofia D Merajver. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002
92
14

Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.
Katrina Armstrong, Ellyn Micco, Amy Carney, Jill Stopfer, Mary Putt. JAMA 2005
301
14

Concerns in a primary care population about genetic discrimination by insurers.
Mark A Hall, Jean E McEwen, James C Barton, Ann P Walker, Edmund G Howe, Jacob A Reiss, Tara E Power, Shellie D Ellis, Diane C Tucker, Barbara W Harrison,[...]. Genet Med 2005
73
11

The general public's information needs and perceptions regarding hereditary cancer: an application of the Integrated Change Model.
Hein de Vries, Ilse Mesters, Hermanna van de Steeg, Cora Honing. Patient Educ Couns 2005
164
11

Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts.
Angela D Lanie, Toby Epstein Jayaratne, Jane P Sheldon, Sharon L R Kardia, Elizabeth S Anderson, Merle Feldbaum, Elizabeth M Petty. J Genet Couns 2004
141
11


A legacy for the children--attitudes of older adults in the United Kingdom to genetic testing.
Heather Skirton, Lorraine Q Frazier, Amy O Calvin, Marlene Z Cohen. J Clin Nurs 2006
23
17

Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.
Donald W Hadley, Jean Jenkins, Eileen Dimond, Kenneth Nakahara, Liam Grogan, David J Liewehr, Seth M Steinberg, Ilan Kirsch. Arch Intern Med 2003
121
11



Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.
C Molster, T Charles, A Samanek, P O'Leary. Public Health Genomics 2009
82
11

Psychological and social determinants of women's decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer.
M Cappelli, L Surh, L Humphreys, S Verma, D Logan, A Hunter, J Allanson. Clin Genet 1999
92
11

Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.
K Armstrong, K Calzone, J Stopfer, G Fitzgerald, J Coyne, B Weber. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000
101
11

Acceptance of genetic testing in a general population: age, education and gender differences.
A R Aro, A Hakonen, M Hietala, J Lönnqvist, P Niemelä, L Peltonen, P Aula. Patient Educ Couns 1997
55
8

Public attitudes toward genetic testing: perceived benefits and objections.
Lidewij Henneman, Danielle R M Timmermans, Gerrit Van Der Wal. Genet Test 2006
50
8

Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.
Fiona M Walter, Jon Emery, Dejana Braithwaite, Theresa M Marteau. Ann Fam Med 2004
180
8

Awareness of genetic testing for increased cancer risk in the year 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
Louise Wideroff, Susan Thomas Vadaparampil, Nancy Breen, Robert T Croyle, Andrew N Freedman. Community Genet 2003
60
8

Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington.
S J Durfy, D J Bowen, A McTiernan, J Sporleder, W Burke. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999
145
8

Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income.
Colleen M McBride, Gerold Bepler, Isaac M Lipkus, Pauline Lyna, Greg Samsa, Jennifer Albright, Santanu Datta, Barbara K Rimer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002
143
8

Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population.
Katrina Armstrong, Barbara Weber, Peter A Ubel, Carmen Guerra, J Sanford Schwartz. Prev Med 2002
53
8

Genetic testing in primary care.
Wylie Burke. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2004
36
8

Lay understanding of genetics: a test of a hypothesis.
M Richards, M Ponder. J Med Genet 1996
66
8


Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing.
P R Billings, M A Kohn, M de Cuevas, J Beckwith, J S Alper, M R Natowicz. Am J Hum Genet 1992
320
8

Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers.
E V Lapham, C Kozma, J O Weiss. Science 1996
196
8

Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women.
Hayley S Thompson, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Chantal Duteau-Buck, Josephine Guevarra, Dana H Bovbjerg, Cassandra Richmond-Avellaneda, David Amarel, Diana Godfrey, Karen Brown, Kenneth Offit. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002
117
8

Utilization of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in the clinical setting: report from a single institution.
Soo-Chin Lee, Barbara A Bernhardt, Kathy J Helzlsouer. Cancer 2002
46
8

Public knowledge and public trust.
Sarah Cunningham-Burley. Community Genet 2006
34
8

Influence of genetic discrimination perceptions and knowledge on cancer genetics referral practice among clinicians.
Katrina J Lowstuter, Sharon Sand, Kathleen R Blazer, Deborah J MacDonald, Kimberly C Banks, Carol A Lee, Barbara U Schwerin, Margaret Juarez, Gwen C Uman, Jeffrey N Weitzel. Genet Med 2008
47
8


Acculturation and familiarity with, attitudes towards and beliefs about genetic testing for cancer risk within Latinas in East Harlem, New York City.
Katarina M Sussner, Hayley S Thompson, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, William H Redd, Lina Jandorf. J Genet Couns 2009
37
8

Men's decision-making about predictive BRCA1/2 testing: the role of family.
N Hallowell, A Ardern-Jones, R Eeles, C Foster, A Lucassen, C Moynihan, M Watson. J Genet Couns 2005
57
8

Medical and lay attitudes towards genetic screening and testing in Finland.
Hanna Toiviainen, Piia Jallinoja, Arja R Aro, Elina Hemminki. Eur J Hum Genet 2003
18
16



Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk.
C Hughes, A Gomez-Caminero, J Benkendorf, J Kerner, C Isaacs, J Barter, C Lerman. Patient Educ Couns 1997
163
8


Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.
Sining Chen, Giovanni Parmigiani. J Clin Oncol 2007
8



Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
153
8

A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.
Lynn F Cherkas, Juliette M Harris, Elana Levinson, Tim D Spector, Barbara Prainsack. PLoS One 2010
76
8

Understanding of genetics among older adults.
Lorraine Frazier, Amy O Calvin, Gia T Mudd, Marlene Z Cohen. J Nurs Scholarsh 2006
24
12

Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information.
Lidewij Henneman, Danielle R M Timmermans, Gerrit van der Wal. Community Genet 2004
100
5


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.