A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Reiko Woodhams, Keiji Matsunaga, Shinichi Kan, Hirofumi Hata, Masanori Ozaki, Keiichi Iwabuchi, Masaru Kuranami, Masahiko Watanabe, Kazushige Hayakawa. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005
Times Cited: 235







List of co-cited articles
523 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Yong Guo, You-Quan Cai, Zu-Long Cai, Yuan-Gui Gao, Ning-Yu An, Lin Ma, Srikanth Mahankali, Jia-Hong Gao. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002
525
46

Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.
Erika Rubesova, Anne-Sophie Grell, Viviane De Maertelaer, Thierry Metens, Shih-Li Chao, Marc Lemort. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006
184
28

Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.
C Marini, C Iacconi, M Giannelli, A Cilotti, M Moretti, C Bartolozzi. Eur Radiol 2007
170
27

Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.
Savannah C Partridge, Wendy B DeMartini, Brenda F Kurland, Peter R Eby, Steven W White, Constance D Lehman. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
180
26

Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?
Wolfgang Bogner, Stephan Gruber, Katja Pinker, Günther Grabner, Andreas Stadlbauer, Michael Weber, Ewald Moser, Thomas H Helbich, Siegfried Trattnig. Radiology 2009
206
26

Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application.
Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Hiroyasu Soeda, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Takeshi Kamitani, Yoshinao Oda, Masazumi Tsuneyoshi, Hiroshi Honda. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008
162
25

Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
Riham H Ei Khouli, Michael A Jacobs, Sarah D Mezban, Peng Huang, Ihab R Kamel, Katarzyna J Macura, David A Bluemke. Radiology 2010
209
22

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.
Mi Jung Park, Eun Suk Cha, Bong Joo Kang, Yon Kwon Ihn, Jun Hyun Baik. Korean J Radiol 2007
121
21

Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
Xin Chen, Wen-ling Li, Yi-li Zhang, Qian Wu, You-min Guo, Zhi-lan Bai. BMC Cancer 2010
136
21

Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI.
Savannah C Partridge, Wendy B Demartini, Brenda F Kurland, Peter R Eby, Steven W White, Constance D Lehman. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010
114
21

Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension.
Reiko Woodhams, Keiji Matsunaga, Keiichi Iwabuchi, Shinichi Kan, Hirofumi Hata, Masaru Kuranami, Masahiko Watanabe, Kazushige Hayakawa. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005
229
19

Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors.
Sibel Kul, Aysegul Cansu, Etem Alhan, Hasan Dinc, Gurbuz Gunes, Abdulkadir Reis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011
140
19

In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization.
Shantanu Sinha, Flora Anne Lucas-Quesada, Usha Sinha, Nanette DeBruhl, Lawrence W Bassett. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002
188
18

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications.
Reiko Woodhams, Saadallah Ramadan, Peter Stanwell, Satoko Sakamoto, Hirofumi Hata, Masanori Ozaki, Shinichi Kan, Yusuke Inoue. Radiographics 2011
121
18

Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, Eduardo Figueiredo, Marisa Nassar Aidar Domingues, Romeu Cortes Domingues, Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
101
17

Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Reiko Woodhams, Satoko Kakita, Hirofumi Hata, Keiichi Iwabuchi, Shigeaki Umeoka, Carolyn E Mountford, Hiroto Hatabu. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
116
16

Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Takashi Okafuji, Takeshi Kamitani, Hiroyasu Soeda, Taro Setoguchi, Shuji Sakai, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Makoto Kubo, Noriaki Sadanaga,[...]. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008
131
15

Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Savannah C Partridge, Christiane D Mullins, Brenda F Kurland, Michael D Allain, Wendy B DeMartini, Peter R Eby, Constance D Lehman. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010
109
15

Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Nicky H G M Peters, Koen L Vincken, Maurice A A J van den Bosch, Peter R Luijten, Willem P Th M Mali, Lambertus W Bartels. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010
67
22


Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions.
Pascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, Matthias Dietzel, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Oumar Camara, Werner A Kaiser. Eur Radiol 2010
95
14

Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness.
M Costantini, P Belli, P Rinaldi, E Bufi, G Giardina, G Franceschini, G Petrone, L Bonomo. Clin Radiol 2010
93
15

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.
Maki Hirano, Hiroko Satake, Satoko Ishigaki, Mitsuru Ikeda, Hisashi Kawai, Shinji Naganawa. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
79
17

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Sang Hee Park, Woo Kyung Moon, Nariya Cho, In Chan Song, Jung Min Chang, In-Ae Park, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh. Radiology 2010
187
13

Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.
R M Mann, C K Kuhl, K Kinkel, C Boetes. Eur Radiol 2008
429
13

Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences.
Evelyn Wenkel, Christian Geppert, Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland, Michael Uder, Berthold Kiefer, Werner Bautz, Rolf Janka. Acad Radiol 2007
92
14

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Sung Hun Kim, Eun Suk Cha, Hyeon Sook Kim, Bong Joo Kang, Jae Jeong Choi, Ji Han Jung, Yong Gyu Park, Young Jin Suh. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009
127
13

MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies.
Claudio Spick, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Margaretha Rudas, Thomas H Helbich, Pascal A Baltzer. Eur Radiol 2014
60
21

Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Monique D Dorrius, Hildebrand Dijkstra, Matthijs Oudkerk, Paul E Sijens. Eur Radiol 2014
84
15


Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques.
Savannah C Partridge, Noam Nissan, Habib Rahbar, Averi E Kitsch, Eric E Sigmund. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017
154
13

Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
Martin D Pickles, Peter Gibbs, Martin Lowry, Lindsay W Turnbull. Magn Reson Imaging 2006
293
12


Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T.
Yoshito Tsushima, Ayako Takahashi-Taketomi, Keigo Endo. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009
92
13

Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.
Sana Parsian, Habib Rahbar, Kimberly H Allison, Wendy B Demartini, Matthew L Olson, Constance D Lehman, Savannah C Partridge. Radiology 2012
58
18

Relation between cancer cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient values using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer.
Miho I Yoshikawa, Shozo Ohsumi, Shigenori Sugata, Masaaki Kataoka, Shigemitsu Takashima, Teruhito Mochizuki, Hirohiko Ikura, Yutaka Imai. Radiat Med 2008
104
11

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T.
Gladys G Lo, Victor Ai, John K F Chan, K W Li, Polly S Y Cheung, T T Wong, Micheal Ma, Raymond Lee, Daisy Chien. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009
64
17

Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.
D Le Bihan, E Breton, D Lallemand, M L Aubin, J Vignaud, M Laval-Jeantet. Radiology 1988
11

Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Mami Iima, Denis Le Bihan, Ryosuke Okumura, Tomohisa Okada, Koji Fujimoto, Shotaro Kanao, Shiro Tanaka, Masakazu Fujimoto, Hiromi Sakashita, Kaori Togashi. Radiology 2011
60
18

Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
Tsugumi Imamura, Ichiro Isomoto, Eijun Sueyoshi, Hiroshi Yano, Tatsuya Uga, Kuniko Abe, Tomayoshi Hayashi, Sumihisa Honda, Takuma Yamaguchi, Masataka Uetani. Magn Reson Med Sci 2010
51
21

Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
Su Kyung Jeh, Sung Hun Kim, Hyeon Sook Kim, Bong Joo Kang, Seung Hee Jeong, Hyeon Woo Yim, Byung Joo Song. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011
110
10

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study.
Pascal A T Baltzer, Anja Schäfer, Matthias Dietzel, David Grässel, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Oumar Camara, Werner A Kaiser. Eur Radiol 2011
72
13

Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics.
S C Partridge, H Rahbar, R Murthy, X Chai, B F Kurland, W B DeMartini, C D Lehman. Magn Reson Med 2011
76
13

Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek, Gada Gaballa, Adel Denewer, Nadia Nada. NMR Biomed 2010
112
10

Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers.
Laura Martincich, Veronica Deantoni, Ilaria Bertotto, Stefania Redana, Franziska Kubatzki, Ivana Sarotto, Valentina Rossi, Michele Liotti, Riccardo Ponzone, Massimo Aglietta,[...]. Eur Radiol 2012
163
10

Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Nicky H G M Peters, Inne H M Borel Rinkes, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Willem P T M Mali, Karel G M Moons, Petra H M Peeters. Radiology 2008
331
10

Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Shunya Sunami, Takeshi Kamitani, Satoshi Kawanami, Taro Setoguchi, Shuji Sakai, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Makoto Kubo, Eriko Tokunaga,[...]. Eur Radiol 2011
83
12

Quantitative non-Gaussian diffusion and intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Mami Iima, Kojiro Yano, Masako Kataoka, Masaki Umehana, Katsutoshi Murata, Shotaro Kanao, Kaori Togashi, Denis Le Bihan. Invest Radiol 2015
130
10

Utility of Diffusion-weighted Imaging to Decrease Unnecessary Biopsies Prompted by Breast MRI: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (A6702).
Habib Rahbar, Zheng Zhang, Thomas L Chenevert, Justin Romanoff, Averi E Kitsch, Lucy G Hanna, Sara M Harvey, Linda Moy, Wendy B DeMartini, Basak Dogan,[...]. Clin Cancer Res 2019
44
22



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.