A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Size matters, but not for everyone: individual differences for contrast discrimination.
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess, Cristyn B Williams. J Vis 2005
Times Cited: 30






Login to export Results
Don't have an account? Register here

List of co-cited articles
270 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Contrast masking in human vision.
G E Legge, J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am 1980
633
21
70

Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model.
J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994
372
19
63

Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation.
C W Tyler, C C Chen. Vision Res 2000
112
14
46

Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.
D G Pelli. J Opt Soc Am A 1985
516
13
43

Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.
John M Foley, Srinivasa Varadharajan, Chin C Koh, Mylene C Q Farias. Vision Res 2007
43
13
43

Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.
Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson, Daniel H Baker. J Vis 2006
185
13
43

Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field.
J G Robson, N Graham. Vision Res 1981
386
12
40

Area summation in human vision at and above detection threshold.
Tim S Meese, Robert J Summers. Proc Biol Sci 2007
39
12
40

Area summation and masking.
Tim S Meese. J Vis 2004
38
11
36

Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency.
J Rovamo, O Luntinen, R Näsänen. Vision Res 1993
81
10
33

A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast.
Andrew B Watson, Albert J Ahumada. J Vis 2005
143
9
30

Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.
C C Chen, C W Tyler. Proc Biol Sci 2001
75
9
30

Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex.
D J Heeger. Vis Neurosci 1992
1137
9
30

Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.
Tim S Meese, Robert J Summers. J Vis 2009
46
9
30

Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin.
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess. J Vis 2004
80
8
26

Spatial summation of peripheral Gabor patches.
V Manahilov, W A Simpson, D L McCulloch. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2001
14
8
57

Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson. Spat Vis 2007
57
8
26

Spatially extensive summation of contrast energy is revealed by contrast detection of micro-pattern textures.
Tim S Meese. J Vis 2010
34
8
26

Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision.
J M Foley, G E Legge. Vision Res 1981
182
7
23

Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection.
J Nachmias, R V Sansbury. Vision Res 1974
330
7
23

Spatial summation in visual noise.
D Kersten. Vision Res 1984
65
7
23

A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection.
R F Quick. Kybernetik 1974
530
7
23

A gain-control theory of binocular combination.
Jian Ding, George Sperling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006
178
7
23

Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.
F W Campbell, D G Green. Nature 1965
304
7
23

The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination.
R J Snowden, S T Hammett. Vision Res 1998
119
7
23

Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision.
J Ross, H D Speed. Proc Biol Sci 1991
139
7
23

Contextual modulation involves suppression and facilitation from the center and the surround.
Tim S Meese, Robert J Summers, David J Holmes, Stuart A Wallis. J Vis 2007
37
7
23

Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local "association field".
D J Field, A Hayes, R F Hess. Vision Res 1993
959
7
23

Invariance of the slope of the psychometric function with spatial summation.
M J Mayer, C W Tyler. J Opt Soc Am A 1986
41
7
23

Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision.
Yury Petrov, Matteo Carandini, Suzanne McKee. J Neurosci 2005
138
7
23

Pattern detection in the presence of maskers that differ in spatial phase and temporal offset: threshold measurements and a model.
J M Foley, C C Chen. Vision Res 1999
47
6
20

The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range.
J S Pointer, R F Hess. Vision Res 1989
124
6
20

Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex.
D G Albrecht, W S Geisler. Vis Neurosci 1991
322
6
20

The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.
F A Wichmann, N J Hill. Percept Psychophys 2001
1509
6
20

Binocular contrast summation--II. Quadratic summation.
G E Legge. Vision Res 1984
134
6
20

The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings.
E R Howell, R F Hess. Vision Res 1978
188
6
20

Probability summation for multiple patches of luminance modulation.
T S Meese, C B Williams. Vision Res 2000
39
6
20

Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision.
J Xing, D J Heeger. Vision Res 2000
137
6
20

Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.
Tim S Meese, David J Holmes. Proc Biol Sci 2007
56
6
20

Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese. Vision Res 2007
65
6
20

Spatial summation in simple (Fourier) and complex (non-Fourier) texture channels.
N Graham, A Sutter. Vision Res 1998
74
6
20

Contrast summation across eyes and space is revealed along the entire dipper function by a "Swiss cheese" stimulus.
Tim S Meese, Daniel H Baker. J Vis 2011
26
6
23

Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms.
C F Stromeyer, S Klein. Vision Res 1974
165
5
16

Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking.
A B Watson, J A Solomon. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1997
156
5
16

Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking.
H R Wilson, D K McFarlane, G C Phillips. Vision Res 1983
328
5
16

Spatial-frequency channels in human vision.
M B Sachs, J Nachmias, J G Robson. J Opt Soc Am 1971
352
5
16

Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency.
A E Burgess, B Colborne. J Opt Soc Am A 1988
205
5
16

Separating the effects of response nonlinearity and internal noise psychophysically.
Leonid L Kontsevich, Chien-Chung Chen, Christopher W Tyler. Vision Res 2002
61
5
16

On the psychometric function for contrast detection.
J Nachmias. Vision Res 1981
155
5
16

Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection.
D J Lasley, T E Cohn. Vision Res 1981
56
5
16


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.

Longstocking, LLC. © 2021
Home | About Us | FAQs | Terms & Privacy