A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Mats G Hansson, Joakim Dillner, Claus R Bartram, Joyce A Carlson, Gert Helgesson. Lancet Oncol 2006
Times Cited: 228







List of co-cited articles
430 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?
B Hofmann. J Med Ethics 2009
95
30

Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?
Kristin Solum Steinsbekk, Bjørn Kåre Myskja, Berge Solberg. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
119
29

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
211
27

In defense of broad consent.
Gert Helgesson. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2012
39
53

Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?
Mark Sheehan. Public Health Ethics 2011
64
29

Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.
Christine Grady, Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim,[...]. Am J Bioeth 2015
135
17

Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
Christian M Simon, Jamie L'heureux, Jeffrey C Murray, Patricia Winokur, George Weiner, Elizabeth Newbury, Laura Shinkunas, Bridget Zimmerman. Genet Med 2011
104
15

From genetic privacy to open consent.
Jeantine E Lunshof, Ruth Chadwick, Daniel B Vorhaus, George M Church. Nat Rev Genet 2008
215
15

Ethics and biobanks.
M G Hansson. Br J Cancer 2009
105
14



From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.
Jane Kaye, Liam Curren, Nick Anderson, Kelly Edwards, Stephanie M Fullerton, Nadja Kanellopoulou, David Lund, Daniel G MacArthur, Deborah Mascalzoni, James Shepherd,[...]. Nat Rev Genet 2012
159
14

Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.
A Cambon-Thomsen, E Rial-Sebbag, B M Knoppers. Eur Respir J 2007
155
13

Ethical endgames: broad consent for narrow interests; open consent for closed minds.
Jan Reinert Karlsen, Jan Helge Solbakk, Søren Holm. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2011
18
66



Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.
Amy L McGuire, Laura M Beskow. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2010
92
11


Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Public Health 2009
114
11

Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus.
Zubin Master, Erin Nelson, Blake Murdoch, Timothy Caulfield. Nat Methods 2012
52
19

DNA databanks and consent: a suggested policy option involving an authorization model.
Timothy Caulfield, Ross E G Upshur, Abdallah Daar. BMC Med Ethics 2003
69
14



Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
168
9


Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research.
Jodyn Platt, Juli Bollinger, Rachel Dvoskin, Sharon L R Kardia, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
52
17




Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
165
8

Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
104
8

Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. Genet Med 2010
132
8


Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
460
7



Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
296
7

Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research.
Linus Johnsson, Gert Helgesson, Thorunn Rafnar, Ingibjorg Halldorsdottir, Kee-Seng Chia, Stefan Eriksson, Mats G Hansson. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
58
12

Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.
Evette J Ludman, Stephanie M Fullerton, Leslie Spangler, Susan Brown Trinidad, Monica M Fujii, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010
80
8

Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ruth Chadwick. Nat Rev Genet 2005
134
7


Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.
Melissa Gymrek, Amy L McGuire, David Golan, Eran Halperin, Yaniv Erlich. Science 2013
466
7

Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Scand J Public Health 2004
138
7

From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.
Kieran C O'Doherty, Michael M Burgess, Kelly Edwards, Richard P Gallagher, Alice K Hawkins, Jane Kaye, Veronica McCaffrey, David E Winickoff. Soc Sci Med 2011
89
7

Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks.
Mark A Rothstein. J Law Med Ethics 2005
54
11

Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.
Laura M Beskow, Joëlle Y Friedman, N Chantelle Hardy, Li Lin, Kevin P Weinfurt. PLoS One 2010
60
10


Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
Judy Allen, Beverley McNamara. Bioethics 2011
46
13


Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?
Donna T Chen, Donald L Rosenstein, Palaniappan Muthappan, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Franklin G Miller, Ezekiel J Emanuel, David Wendler. Arch Intern Med 2005
81
7


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.