A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio, Richard R Fabsitz, Russell V Luepker. Am J Med Genet A 2006
Times Cited: 160







List of co-cited articles
458 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
280
66

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
458
41

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
220
34

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
296
33

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
195
31

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
31


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
201
25

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
129
25

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
235
25

Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.
F A Miller, R Christensen, M Giacomini, J S Robert. J Med Ethics 2008
90
20

Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire, Mildred Cho, Janet A Buchanan, Michael M Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk, Christina M Diaz, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Shane K Green, Marc A Hodosh,[...]. PLoS Biol 2008
155
17


Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
149
17

The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2012
87
19

Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Lainie Friedman Ross. JAMA 2006
72
22

Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Charles Weijer. IRB 2003
132
16






Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact.
Isaac S Kohane, Kenneth D Mandl, Patrick L Taylor, Ingrid A Holm, Daniel J Nigrin, Louis M Kunkel. Science 2007
100
14

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
157
14


Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing.
Amy L McGuire, Timothy Caulfield, Mildred K Cho. Nat Rev Genet 2008
141
13

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
82
15



Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
122
12


The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.
Isaac S Kohane, Daniel R Masys, Russ B Altman. JAMA 2006
213
11

Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider.
Gaile Renegar, Christopher J Webster, Steffen Stuerzebecher, Lea Harty, Susan E Ide, Beth Balkite, Taryn A Rogalski-Salter, Nadine Cohen, Brian B Spear, Diane M Barnes,[...]. Bioethics 2006
69
15

Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research.
Meredith C Meacham, Helene Starks, Wylie Burke, Kelly Edwards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010
48
22

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
212
11

Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
Conrad V Fernandez, Charles Weijer. Am J Bioeth 2006
28
35


Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
Annelien L Bredenoord, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Johannes J M Van Delden. Hum Mutat 2011
87
11

Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants.
Conrad V Fernandez, Chris Skedgel, Charles Weijer. CMAJ 2004
63
14

The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.
Susan M Wolf, Jordan Paradise, Charlisse Caga-anan. J Law Med Ethics 2008
70
12

The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
Kristien Hens, Herman Nys, Jean-Jacques Cassiman, Kris Dierickx. J Med Ethics 2011
47
19


Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network.
Stephanie M Fullerton, Wendy A Wolf, Kyle B Brothers, Ellen Wright Clayton, Dana C Crawford, Joshua C Denny, Philip Greenland, Barbara A Koenig, Kathleen A Leppig, Noralane M Lindor,[...]. Genet Med 2012
80
11

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
120
9

IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research.
Lynn G Dressler, Sondra Smolek, Roselle Ponsaran, Janell M Markey, Helene Starks, Nancy Gerson, Susan Lewis, Nancy Press, Eric Juengst, Georgia L Wiesner. Genet Med 2012
48
18

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
799
9



What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.
Fiona Alice Miller, Robin Zoe Hayeems, Jessica Peace Bytautas. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
44
18

Genomic research and incidental findings.
Brian Van Ness. J Law Med Ethics 2008
34
23


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.