A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Megan Fong, Kathryn L Braun, R Mei-Ling Chang. J Cancer Educ 2006
Times Cited: 21







List of co-cited articles
181 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.
Jill M Pulley, Margaret M Brace, Gordon R Bernard, Dan R Masys. Cell Tissue Bank 2008
75
28


Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.
John S Luque, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Francisco A Montel-Ishino, Mariana Arevalo, Shalanda A Bynum, Shalewa Noel-Thomas, Kristen J Wells, Clement K Gwede, Cathy D Meade. J Cancer Educ 2012
67
28


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
210
23


Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population.
M D Schwartz, K Rothenberg, L Joseph, J Benkendorf, C Lerman. Am J Med Genet 2001
47
19

Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?
Donna T Chen, Donald L Rosenstein, Palaniappan Muthappan, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Franklin G Miller, Ezekiel J Emanuel, David Wendler. Arch Intern Med 2005
81
19


Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Scand J Public Health 2004
140
19

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
163
19

Strategies and stakeholders: minority recruitment in cancer genetics research.
Rosalina D James, Joon-Ho Yu, Nora B Henrikson, Deborah J Bowen, Stephanie M Fullerton. Community Genet 2008
35
19

Alaska native people's perceptions, understandings, and expectations for research involving biological specimens.
Vanessa Y Hiratsuka, Jennifer K Brown, Theresa J Hoeft, Denise A Dillard. Int J Circumpolar Health 2012
36
19

Views of biobanking research among Alaska native people: the role of community context.
Vanessa Hiratsuka, Jennifer Brown, Denise Dillard. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2012
29
19

Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking.
Zubin Master, Jaime O Claudio, Christen Rachul, Jean C Y Wang, Mark D Minden, Timothy Caulfield. BMC Med Genomics 2013
35
19

Native Hawaiian views on biobanking.
Maile Tauali i, Elise Leimomi Davis, Kathryn L Braun, JoAnn Umilani Tsark, Ngiare Brown, Maui Hudson, Wylie Burke. J Cancer Educ 2014
14
28

Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients.
Rebecca D Pentz, Laurent Billot, David Wendler. Am J Med Genet A 2006
65
14

Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials.
Paul R Helft, Victoria L Champion, Rachael Eckles, Cynthia S Johnson, Eric M Meslin. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2007
40
14

Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: a survey from a community in Singapore.
M L Wong, K S Chia, W M Yam, G R Teodoro, K W Lau. Clin Genet 2004
57
14

How does the collection of genetic test results affect research participants?
David Wendler, Rebecca Pentz. Am J Med Genet A 2007
16
18

Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
107
14

Ethics of future disclosure of individual risk information in a genetic cohort study: a survey of donor preferences.
Kenji Matsui, Reidar K Lie, Yoshikuni Kita, Hirotsugu Ueshima. J Epidemiol 2008
22
14

When research seems like clinical care: a qualitative study of the communication of individual cancer genetic research results.
Fiona A Miller, Mita Giacomini, Catherine Ahern, Jason S Robert, Sonya de Laat. BMC Med Ethics 2008
28
14

What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.
Fiona Alice Miller, Robin Zoe Hayeems, Jessica Peace Bytautas. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
46
14

Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
182
14

Attitudes of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives regarding participation in research.
Dedra Buchwald, Veronica Mendoza-Jenkins, Calvin Croy, Helen McGough, Marjorie Bezdek, Paul Spicer. J Gen Intern Med 2006
42
14


Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
Colin Me Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross. J Community Genet 2012
34
14

Cancer patient perceptions about biobanking and preferred timing of consent.
Kathryn L Braun, Joann U Tsark, Amy Powers, Kristen Croom, Robert Kim, Francine C Gachupin, Paul Morris. Biopreserv Biobank 2014
20
15

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
67
14

Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
Corinna Porteri, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Elena Togni, Michael Parker. BMC Med Ethics 2014
35
14


Biospecimen "ownership": counterpoint.
Lynn G Dressler. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007
9
22

Ethical, legal, and policy issues: dominating the biospecimen discussion.
Jimmie B Vaught, Nicole Lockhart, Karen S Thiel, Julie A Schneider. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007
16
12


Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.
A Cambon-Thomsen, E Rial-Sebbag, B M Knoppers. Eur Respir J 2007
158
9

Biobank research: reporting results to individual participants.
Jasper Bovenberg, Tineke Meulenkamp, Ellen Smets, Sjef Gevers. Eur J Health Law 2009
19
10

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
223
9

Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Charles Weijer. IRB 2003
134
9


Beyond "misunderstanding": written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study.
Mary Dixon-Woods, Richard E Ashcroft, Clare J Jackson, Martin D Tobin, Joelle Kivits, Paul R Burton, Nilesh J Samani. Soc Sci Med 2007
87
9

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
198
9

Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.
F A Miller, R Christensen, M Giacomini, J S Robert. J Med Ethics 2008
93
9

Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: standpoints of professionals and patients.
Grégoire Moutel, Nathalie Duchange, François Raffi, Lama I Sharara, Ioannis Théodorou, Violaine Noël, Sandrine de Montgolfier, Ingrid Callies, François Bricaire, Christian Hervé,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2005
24
9



Evaluation of conceptual framework for recruitment of African American patients with breast cancer.
Sue P Heiney, Swann Arp Adams, Linda M Wells, Hiluv Johnson. Oncol Nurs Forum 2010
20
10

Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.
Geraldine M McQuillan, Kathryn S Porter, Maria Agelli, Raynard Kington. Genet Med 2003
125
9

The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research.
Jada Bussey-Jones, Joanne Garrett, Gail Henderson, Mairead Moloney, Connie Blumenthal, Giselle Corbie-Smith. Genet Med 2010
79
9


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.