A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Béatrice Godard, Jennifer Marshall, Claude Laberge. Community Genet 2007
Times Cited: 81







List of co-cited articles
391 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
171
29

Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Scand J Public Health 2004
138
23

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
159
22

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
204
22

Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
105
17

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
221
16



The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
196
14

Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
K C O'Doherty, M M Burgess. Public Health Genomics 2009
68
17

Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
174
14

Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap project.
Charles Rotimi, Mark Leppert, Ichiro Matsuda, Changqing Zeng, Houcan Zhang, Clement Adebamowo, Ike Ajayi, Toyin Aniagwu, Missy Dixon, Yoshimitsu Fukushima,[...]. Community Genet 2007
41
26

Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.
David M Secko, Nina Preto, Simon Niemeyer, Michael M Burgess. Soc Sci Med 2009
83
13

Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project.
Catherine A McCarty, Donna Chapman-Stone, Teresa Derfus, Philip F Giampietro, Norman Fost. Am J Med Genet A 2008
61
18




Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions.
Laura M Beskow, Elizabeth Dean. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008
86
12

Community engagement in biobanking: Experiences from the eMERGE Network.
Amy A Lemke, Joel T Wu, Carol Waudby, Jill Pulley, Carol P Somkin, Susan Brown Trinidad. Genom Soc Policy 2010
35
28


Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Public Health 2009
115
11

Veterans' attitudes regarding a database for genomic research.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Lori Erby, Kathy Hudson, Joan Scott. Genet Med 2009
35
25

Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. Genet Med 2010
136
11

Great expectations: views of genetic research participants regarding current and future genetic studies.
Gail Henderson, Joanne Garrett, Jada Bussey-Jones, Mairead Eastin Moloney, Connie Blumenthal, Giselle Corbie-Smith. Genet Med 2008
42
19

The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.
C V Fernandez, D Santor, C Weijer, C Strahlendorf, A Moghrabi, R Pentz, J Gao, E Kodish. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007
50
16

Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research.
Sara Chandros Hull, Richard R Sharp, Jeffrey R Botkin, Mark Brown, Mark Hughes, Jeremy Sugarman, Debra Schwinn, Pamela Sankar, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Brian R Clarridge,[...]. Am J Bioeth 2008
81
9

DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives.
Amy L McGuire, Jennifer A Hamilton, Rebecca Lunstroth, Laurence B McCullough, Alica Goldman. Genet Med 2008
75
10


Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Charles Weijer. IRB 2003
133
9

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
66
12

Enhancing geneticists' perspectives of the public through community engagement.
Julianne M O'Daniel, Katie D Rosanbalm, Larry Boles, Genevieve M Tindall, Troy M Livingston, Susanne B Haga. Genet Med 2012
16
50


Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2006
159
8

Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider.
Gaile Renegar, Christopher J Webster, Steffen Stuerzebecher, Lea Harty, Susan E Ide, Beth Balkite, Taryn A Rogalski-Salter, Nadine Cohen, Brian B Spear, Diane M Barnes,[...]. Bioethics 2006
69
10

Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.
F A Miller, R Christensen, M Giacomini, J S Robert. J Med Ethics 2008
90
8


Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?
Donna T Chen, Donald L Rosenstein, Palaniappan Muthappan, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Franklin G Miller, Ezekiel J Emanuel, David Wendler. Arch Intern Med 2005
81
7

Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion.
David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa Leroy, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2008
60
10

Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: a survey from a community in Singapore.
M L Wong, K S Chia, W M Yam, G R Teodoro, K W Lau. Clin Genet 2004
55
10

Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.
L M Beskow, W Burke, J F Merz, P A Barr, S Terry, V B Penchaszadeh, L O Gostin, M Gwinn, M J Khoury. JAMA 2001
184
7

Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer.
M P M Richards, M Ponder, P Pharoah, S Everest, J Mackay. J Med Ethics 2003
43
13

Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays.
Nils Homer, Szabolcs Szelinger, Margot Redman, David Duggan, Waibhav Tembe, Jill Muehling, John V Pearson, Dietrich A Stephan, Stanley F Nelson, David W Craig. PLoS Genet 2008
451
7

Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Ruth Chadwick. Nat Rev Genet 2005
135
7


Predicting intention to biobank: a national survey.
Christine R Critchley, Dianne Nicol, Margaret F A Otlowski, Mark J A Stranger. Eur J Public Health 2012
46
13

A vision for the future of genomics research.
Francis S Collins, Eric D Green, Alan E Guttmacher, Mark S Guyer. Nature 2003
6

Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Lainie Friedman Ross. JAMA 2006
73
6

Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research.
S S Wang, F Fridinger, K M Sheedy, M J Khoury. Community Genet 2001
98
6

Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.
Geraldine M McQuillan, Kathryn S Porter, Maria Agelli, Raynard Kington. Genet Med 2003
125
6

Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine.
D M Roden, J M Pulley, M A Basford, G R Bernard, E W Clayton, J R Balser, D R Masys. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008
544
6


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.