Michael H Birnbaum. Psychol Rev 2008
Times Cited: 68
Times Cited: 68
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 1993
J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 1993
41
The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs.
Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer, Ralph Hertwig. Psychol Rev 2006
Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer, Ralph Hertwig. Psychol Rev 2006
32
Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making.
R M Roe, J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 2001
R M Roe, J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 2001
22
20
The probabilistic nature of preferential choice.
Jörg Rieskamp. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2008
Jörg Rieskamp. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2008
21
Cognitive models of risky choice: parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory.
Andreas Glöckner, Thorsten Pachur. Cognition 2012
Andreas Glöckner, Thorsten Pachur. Cognition 2012
27
Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice.
Ralph Hertwig, Greg Barron, Elke U Weber, Ido Erev. Psychol Sci 2004
Ralph Hertwig, Greg Barron, Elke U Weber, Ido Erev. Psychol Sci 2004
19
Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.
Marius Usher, James L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2004
Marius Usher, James L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2004
17
Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal.
Konstantinos Tsetsos, Nick Chater, Marius Usher. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012
Konstantinos Tsetsos, Nick Chater, Marius Usher. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012
16
14
A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena.
Joseph G Johnson, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Rev 2005
Joseph G Johnson, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Rev 2005
16
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.
Ian Krajbich, Carrie Armel, Antonio Rangel. Nat Neurosci 2010
Ian Krajbich, Carrie Armel, Antonio Rangel. Nat Neurosci 2010
14
The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model.
M Usher, J L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2001
M Usher, J L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2001
13
13
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.
G Gigerenzer, D G Goldstein. Psychol Rev 1996
G Gigerenzer, D G Goldstein. Psychol Rev 1996
11
Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)?
Christoph Ungemach, Nick Chater, Neil Stewart. Psychol Sci 2009
Christoph Ungemach, Nick Chater, Neil Stewart. Psychol Sci 2009
12
Risky choice with heuristics: reply to Birnbaum (2008), Johnson, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, and Willemsen (2008), and Rieger and Wang (2008).
Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer, Ralph Hertwig. Psychol Rev 2008
Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer, Ralph Hertwig. Psychol Rev 2008
40
Aspects of endowment: a query theory of value construction.
Eric J Johnson, Gerald Häubl, Anat Keinan. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007
Eric J Johnson, Gerald Häubl, Anat Keinan. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007
11
Transitivity of preferences.
Michel Regenwetter, Jason Dana, Clintin P Davis-Stober. Psychol Rev 2011
Michel Regenwetter, Jason Dana, Clintin P Davis-Stober. Psychol Rev 2011
15
Strategies for multiattribute binary choice.
J E Russo, B A Dosher. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1983
J E Russo, B A Dosher. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1983
10
Of black swans and tossed coins: is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events?
Elliot A Ludvig, Marcia L Spetch. PLoS One 2011
Elliot A Ludvig, Marcia L Spetch. PLoS One 2011
16
The Role of Aspiration Level in Risky Choice: A Comparison of Cumulative Prospect Theory and SP/A Theory.
Lopes, Oden. J Math Psychol 1999
Lopes, Oden. J Math Psychol 1999
20
Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework.
Anuj K Shah, Daniel M Oppenheimer. Psychol Bull 2008
Anuj K Shah, Daniel M Oppenheimer. Psychol Bull 2008
8
Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006).
Michael H Birnbaum. Psychol Rev 2008
Michael H Birnbaum. Psychol Rev 2008
37
Process models deserve process data: comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006).
Eric J Johnson, Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Martijn C Willemsen. Psychol Rev 2008
Eric J Johnson, Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Martijn C Willemsen. Psychol Rev 2008
16
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.
Ian Krajbich, Antonio Rangel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
Ian Krajbich, Antonio Rangel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
8
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.
Shinsuke Shimojo, Claudiu Simion, Eiko Shimojo, Christian Scheier. Nat Neurosci 2003
Shinsuke Shimojo, Claudiu Simion, Eiko Shimojo, Christian Scheier. Nat Neurosci 2003
8
Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints
Diederich. J Math Psychol 1997
Diederich. J Math Psychol 1997
8
A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.
Roger Ratcliff, Philip L Smith. Psychol Rev 2004
Roger Ratcliff, Philip L Smith. Psychol Rev 2004
8
8
The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.
Sabrina M Tom, Craig R Fox, Christopher Trepel, Russell A Poldrack. Science 2007
Sabrina M Tom, Craig R Fox, Christopher Trepel, Russell A Poldrack. Science 2007
7
Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain.
Benedetto De Martino, Dharshan Kumaran, Ben Seymour, Raymond J Dolan. Science 2006
Benedetto De Martino, Dharshan Kumaran, Ben Seymour, Raymond J Dolan. Science 2006
7
Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice.
Ryan K Jessup, Anthony J Bishara, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Sci 2008
Ryan K Jessup, Anthony J Bishara, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Sci 2008
9
Separate neural mechanisms underlie choices and strategic preferences in risky decision making.
Vinod Venkatraman, John W Payne, James R Bettman, Mary Frances Luce, Scott A Huettel. Neuron 2009
Vinod Venkatraman, John W Payne, James R Bettman, Mary Frances Luce, Scott A Huettel. Neuron 2009
7
Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.
Christopher Trepel, Craig R Fox, Russell A Poldrack. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005
Christopher Trepel, Craig R Fox, Russell A Poldrack. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005
7
Decision by sampling: the role of the decision environment in risky choice.
Neil Stewart. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2009
Neil Stewart. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2009
12
7
13
Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision-making seem equally good.
Andreas Jarvstad, Ulrike Hahn, Simon K Rushton, Paul A Warren. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013
Andreas Jarvstad, Ulrike Hahn, Simon K Rushton, Paul A Warren. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013
18
Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.
Nicolas A J Berkowitsch, Benjamin Scheibehenne, Jörg Rieskamp. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014
Nicolas A J Berkowitsch, Benjamin Scheibehenne, Jörg Rieskamp. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014
17
How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.
S Roberts, H Pashler. Psychol Rev 2000
S Roberts, H Pashler. Psychol Rev 2000
5
Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk.
Neil Stewart, Nick Chater, Henry P Stott, Stian Reimers. J Exp Psychol Gen 2003
Neil Stewart, Nick Chater, Henry P Stott, Stian Reimers. J Exp Psychol Gen 2003
9
Decisions under uncertainty: probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices.
Scott A Huettel, Allen W Song, Gregory McCarthy. J Neurosci 2005
Scott A Huettel, Allen W Song, Gregory McCarthy. J Neurosci 2005
5
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.