A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Laura M Beskow, Elizabeth Dean. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008
Times Cited: 86







List of co-cited articles
452 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
106
20

Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
175
18

Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Public Health 2009
116
17


Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
179
16

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
161
13

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2006
162
13

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
209
13


Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project.
Catherine A McCarty, Donna Chapman-Stone, Teresa Derfus, Philip F Giampietro, Norman Fost. Am J Med Genet A 2008
61
18

Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. Genet Med 2010
137
12


Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.
David M Secko, Nina Preto, Simon Niemeyer, Michael M Burgess. Soc Sci Med 2009
83
12


False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.
P S Appelbaum, L H Roth, C W Lidz, P Benson, W Winslade. Hastings Cent Rep 1987
571
10

Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Scand J Public Health 2004
139
10

Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research.
Sara Chandros Hull, Richard R Sharp, Jeffrey R Botkin, Mark Brown, Mark Hughes, Jeremy Sugarman, Debra Schwinn, Pamela Sankar, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Brian R Clarridge,[...]. Am J Bioeth 2008
81
11

DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives.
Amy L McGuire, Jennifer A Hamilton, Rebecca Lunstroth, Laurence B McCullough, Alica Goldman. Genet Med 2008
77
11

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
285
10

Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.
Evette J Ludman, Stephanie M Fullerton, Leslie Spangler, Susan Brown Trinidad, Monica M Fujii, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010
84
10

Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients.
Rebecca D Pentz, Laurent Billot, David Wendler. Am J Med Genet A 2006
65
12

Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?
Mats G Hansson, Joakim Dillner, Claus R Bartram, Joyce A Carlson, Gert Helgesson. Lancet Oncol 2006
232
9

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
198
9

Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?
Donna T Chen, Donald L Rosenstein, Palaniappan Muthappan, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Franklin G Miller, Ezekiel J Emanuel, David Wendler. Arch Intern Med 2005
81
9

Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.
Laura M Beskow, Sondra J Smolek. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2009
34
23

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
474
9

Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives.
Laura M Beskow, Joëlle Y Friedman, N Chantelle Hardy, Li Lin, Kevin P Weinfurt. Genet Med 2010
37
21

Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.
Laura M Beskow, Joëlle Y Friedman, N Chantelle Hardy, Li Lin, Kevin P Weinfurt. PLoS One 2010
61
13

Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.
L M Beskow, W Burke, J F Merz, P A Barr, S Terry, V B Penchaszadeh, L O Gostin, M Gwinn, M J Khoury. JAMA 2001
185
8

Beyond "misunderstanding": written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study.
Mary Dixon-Woods, Richard E Ashcroft, Clare J Jackson, Martin D Tobin, Joelle Kivits, Paul R Burton, Nilesh J Samani. Soc Sci Med 2007
87
8




Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.
F A Miller, R Christensen, M Giacomini, J S Robert. J Med Ethics 2008
93
8


Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.
Jill M Pulley, Margaret M Brace, Gordon R Bernard, Dan R Masys. Cell Tissue Bank 2008
75
9

Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion.
David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa Leroy, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2008
60
11

Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays.
Nils Homer, Szabolcs Szelinger, Margot Redman, David Duggan, Waibhav Tembe, Jill Muehling, John V Pearson, Dietrich A Stephan, Stanley F Nelson, David W Craig. PLoS Genet 2008
460
8

Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research.
S S Wang, F Fridinger, K M Sheedy, M J Khoury. Community Genet 2001
98
8

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
137
8

Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine.
Robert E Hewitt. Curr Opin Oncol 2011
164
8


Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.
John S Luque, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Francisco A Montel-Ishino, Mariana Arevalo, Shalanda A Bynum, Shalewa Noel-Thomas, Kristen J Wells, Clement K Gwede, Cathy D Meade. J Cancer Educ 2012
66
10

Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus.
Zubin Master, Erin Nelson, Blake Murdoch, Timothy Caulfield. Nat Methods 2012
55
12

Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Michelle Wrenn, Nikki M Carroll, Heather Spencer Feigelson. J Community Genet 2013
58
12

Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Charles Weijer. IRB 2003
134
6

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
223
6



Genetics. No longer de-identified.
Amy L McGuire, Richard A Gibbs. Science 2006
119
6


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.