A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
Times Cited: 149







List of co-cited articles
537 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
189
36

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
31

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
272
30


Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
274
24

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
422
18

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
219
18

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
198
17

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
61
27

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
125
17

Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
152
16


Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
161
14

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
51
27

Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network.
Stephanie M Fullerton, Wendy A Wolf, Kyle B Brothers, Ellen Wright Clayton, Dana C Crawford, Joshua C Denny, Philip Greenland, Barbara A Koenig, Kathleen A Leppig, Noralane M Lindor,[...]. Genet Med 2012
79
16

Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
140
12

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2006
148
11

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
77
14

Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.
Christopher A Cassa, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire, Kenneth D Mandl. Genome Res 2012
67
14

Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Public Health 2009
105
10

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
114
10


Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
28
35

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
100
10

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
10

Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.
Saskia C Sanderson, Kyle B Brothers, Nathaniel D Mercaldo, Ellen Wright Clayton, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Sharon A Aufox, Murray H Brilliant, Diego Campos, David S Carrell, John Connolly,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2017
75
13

Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.
Flavia M Facio, Stephanie Brooks, Johanna Loewenstein, Susannah Green, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2011
95
9

The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.
Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Jonathan G Amatruda, Catherine M Clinton, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Noelle L Huntington, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. Genet Med 2012
36
25

Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
Christian M Simon, Jamie L'heureux, Jeffrey C Murray, Patricia Winokur, George Weiner, Elizabeth Newbury, Laura Shinkunas, Bridget Zimmerman. Genet Med 2011
91
9

Veterans' attitudes regarding a database for genomic research.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Lori Erby, Kathy Hudson, Joan Scott. Genet Med 2009
33
27

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
204
9


Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.
S B Trinidad, S M Fullerton, E J Ludman, G P Jarvik, E B Larson, W Burke. Science 2011
65
12

Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
99
8

Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research.
Linus Johnsson, Gert Helgesson, Thorunn Rafnar, Ingibjorg Halldorsdottir, Kee-Seng Chia, Stefan Eriksson, Mats G Hansson. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
54
14


The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2012
81
9

Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact.
Isaac S Kohane, Kenneth D Mandl, Patrick L Taylor, Ingrid A Holm, Daniel J Nigrin, Louis M Kunkel. Science 2007
94
8


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
699
8

A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.
David J Kaufman, Rebecca Baker, Lauren C Milner, Stephanie Devaney, Kathy L Hudson. PLoS One 2016
47
17


Great expectations: views of genetic research participants regarding current and future genetic studies.
Gail Henderson, Joanne Garrett, Jada Bussey-Jones, Mairead Eastin Moloney, Connie Blumenthal, Giselle Corbie-Smith. Genet Med 2008
40
17

Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.
Melissa Gymrek, Amy L McGuire, David Golan, Eran Halperin, Yaniv Erlich. Science 2013
428
7


The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
169
7

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
120
7

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
115
7

Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.
Laura M Beskow, Sondra J Smolek. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2009
32
21

Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Amy L McGuire, Steven Joffe, Barbara A Koenig, Barbara B Biesecker, Laurence B McCullough, Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby, Timothy Caulfield, Sharon F Terry, Robert C Green. Science 2013
122
7


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.