A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
Times Cited: 165







List of co-cited articles
597 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
211
35

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
32


Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
288
23

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
263
20

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
70
25

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
308
18

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
60
26

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
121
16

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
223
15

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
484
14

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
141
13

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
87
14

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
134
13

Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
188
12

Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
37
32

Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
179
11

Veterans' attitudes regarding a database for genomic research.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Lori Erby, Kathy Hudson, Joan Scott. Genet Med 2009
38
28

A new initiative on precision medicine.
Francis S Collins, Harold Varmus. N Engl J Med 2015
11

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
994
11

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
42
26

A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.
David J Kaufman, Rebecca Baker, Lauren C Milner, Stephanie Devaney, Kathy L Hudson. PLoS One 2016
64
17

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
219
10


Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.
Saskia C Sanderson, Kyle B Brothers, Nathaniel D Mercaldo, Ellen Wright Clayton, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Sharon A Aufox, Murray H Brilliant, Diego Campos, David S Carrell, John Connolly,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2017
116
10

Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Public Health 2009
118
9

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2006
163
9

Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.
Christopher A Cassa, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire, Kenneth D Mandl. Genome Res 2012
72
12


Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.
Flavia M Facio, Stephanie Brooks, Johanna Loewenstein, Susannah Green, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2011
105
9

Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
154
9

The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.
Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Jonathan G Amatruda, Catherine M Clinton, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Noelle L Huntington, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. Genet Med 2012
40
22


Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.
N Arar, J Seo, S Lee, H E Abboud, L A Copeland, P Noel, M Parchman. Public Health Genomics 2010
16
50



Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
Christian M Simon, Jamie L'heureux, Jeffrey C Murray, Patricia Winokur, George Weiner, Elizabeth Newbury, Laura Shinkunas, Bridget Zimmerman. Genet Med 2011
112
8

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
198
7

Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network.
Stephanie M Fullerton, Wendy A Wolf, Kyle B Brothers, Ellen Wright Clayton, Dana C Crawford, Joshua C Denny, Philip Greenland, Barbara A Koenig, Kathleen A Leppig, Noralane M Lindor,[...]. Genet Med 2012
83
8


Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Scand J Public Health 2004
141
7

Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact.
Isaac S Kohane, Kenneth D Mandl, Patrick L Taylor, Ingrid A Holm, Daniel J Nigrin, Louis M Kunkel. Science 2007
101
7


Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.
Laura M Beskow, Joëlle Y Friedman, N Chantelle Hardy, Li Lin, Kevin P Weinfurt. PLoS One 2010
64
10


Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
109
7

Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.
Kurt D Christensen, J Scott Roberts, David I Shalowitz, Jessica N Everett, Scott Y H Kim, Leon Raskin, Stephen B Gruber. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011
38
18

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
59
11

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
47
14

When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.
Leila Jamal, Jill O Robinson, Kurt D Christensen, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Melody J Slashinski, Denise Lautenbach Perry, Jason L Vassy, Julia Wycliff, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017
27
25


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.