A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Chris M R Smerecnik, Ilse Mesters, Eline Verweij, Nanne K de Vries, Hein de Vries. J Genet Couns 2009
Times Cited: 82







List of co-cited articles
622 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review.
Phyllis N Butow, Elizabeth A Lobb, Bettina Meiser, Alexandra Barratt, Katherine M Tucker. Med J Aust 2003
122
28


How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.
Stephanie Sivell, Glyn Elwyn, Clara L Gaff, Angus J Clarke, Rachel Iredale, Chris Shaw, Joanna Dundon, Hazel Thornton, Adrian Edwards. J Genet Couns 2008
88
19


A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
354
13

The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.
M Watson, S Lloyd, J Davidson, L Meyer, R Eeles, S Ebbs, V Murday. Br J Cancer 1999
182
13

Patients' resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for BRCA1/2.
Andrea D Gurmankin, Susan Domchek, Jill Stopfer, Christina Fels, Katrina Armstrong. Arch Intern Med 2005
62
17


Longer-term influence of breast cancer genetic counseling on cognitions and distress: smaller benefits for affected versus unaffected women.
Arwen H Pieterse, Margreet G E M Ausems, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Sandra van Dulmen. Patient Educ Couns 2011
27
40

Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes.
E A Lobb, P N Butow, A Barratt, B Meiser, C Gaff, M A Young, E Haan, G Suthers, M Gattas, K Tucker. Br J Cancer 2004
96
12

The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study.
A Cull, H Miller, T Porterfield, J Mackay, E D Anderson, C M Steel, R A Elton. Br J Cancer 1998
96
12

Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.
C Lerman, E Lustbader, B Rimer, M Daly, S Miller, C Sands, A Balshem. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995
345
12

Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.
M Horowitz, N Wilner, W Alvarez. Psychosom Med 1979
12

Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.
Patricia McCarthy Veach, Dianne M Bartels, Bonnie S Leroy. J Genet Couns 2007
132
10

Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: systematic review.
A Edwards, J Gray, A Clarke, J Dundon, G Elwyn, C Gaff, K Hood, R Iredale, S Sivell, C Shaw,[...]. Patient Educ Couns 2008
73
12

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
219
10

Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004
131
10

Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.
A Antoniou, P D P Pharoah, S Narod, H A Risch, J E Eyfjord, J L Hopper, N Loman, H Olsson, O Johannsson, A Borg,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2003
10


Communicating risk information in genetic counseling: an observational study.
Susan Michie, Kathryn Lester, Julia Pinto, Theresa M Marteau. Health Educ Behav 2005
31
25

Long-term outcomes of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.
B Meiser, P N Butow, A L Barratt, V Schnieden, M Gattas, J Kirk, C Gaff, G Suthers, K Tucker. Patient Educ Couns 2001
68
11

What's the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer.
Sandra van Dijk, Wilma Otten, Daniëlle R M Timmermans, Christi J van Asperen, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Aad Tibben, Martijn H Breuning, Job Kievit. Genet Med 2005
42
19

Feeling at risk: how women interpret their familial breast cancer risk.
Sandra van Dijk, Wilma Otten, Christi J van Asperen, Danielle R M Timmermans, Aad Tibben, Moniek W Zoeteweij, Sylvia Silberg, Martijn H Breuning, Job Kievit. Am J Med Genet A 2004
25
32

Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer.
Sandra van Dijk, Daniëlle R M Timmermans, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Aad Tibben, Christi J van Asperen, Wilma Otten. J Clin Oncol 2006
60
13



Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions.
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, S D Sofia D Merajver. Soc Sci Med 2004
89
8

Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling.
M Berkenstadt, S Shiloh, G Barkai, M B Katznelson, B Goldman. Am J Med Genet 1999
104
8

Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic services.
Claire Julian-Reynier, Myriam Welkenhuysen, Lea Hagoel, Marleen Decruyenaere, Penelope Hopwood. Eur J Hum Genet 2003
55
12

General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.
I M Lipkus, G Samsa, B K Rimer. Med Decis Making 2001
677
8

Using the common sense model to understand perceived cancer risk in individuals testing for BRCA1/2 mutations.
Kimberly Kelly, Howard Leventhal, Michael Andrykowski, Deborah Toppmeyer, Judy Much, James Dermody, Monica Marvin, Jill Baran, Marvin Schwalb. Psychooncology 2005
58
12


Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.
Michael J Green, Susan K Peterson, Maria Wagner Baker, Gregory R Harper, Lois C Friedman, Wendy S Rubinstein, David T Mauger. JAMA 2004
216
8

Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.
Sining Chen, Giovanni Parmigiani. J Clin Oncol 2007
8

Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.
Bettina Meiser, Jennifer Irle, Elizabeth Lobb, Kristine Barlow-Stewart. J Genet Couns 2008
95
7

Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?
A H Pieterse, A M van Dulmen, M G E M Ausems, F A Beemer, J M Bensing. Br J Cancer 2005
51
11


Goals of genetic counseling.
B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2001
118
7

Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?
M Watson, V Duvivier, M Wade Walsh, S Ashley, J Davidson, M Papaikonomou, V Murday, N Sacks, R Eeles. J Med Genet 1998
108
7

The counsellees' view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life.
Joël Vos, Wilma Otten, Christi van Asperen, Anna Jansen, Fred Menko, Aad Tibben. Psychooncology 2008
80
7

Risk communication in completed series of breast cancer genetic counseling visits.
Arwen H Pieterse, Sandra van Dulmen, Sandra van Dijk, Jozien M Bensing, Margreet G E M Ausems. Genet Med 2006
19
31

What do women really want to know? Motives for attending familial breast cancer clinics.
C J Van Asperen, S Van Dijk, M W Zoeteweij, D R M Timmermans, G H De Bock, E J Meijers-Heijboer, M F Niermeijer, M H Breuning, J Kievit, W Otten. J Med Genet 2002
54
11

Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
Daniëlle R M Timmermans, Caroline F Ockhuysen-Vermey, Lidewij Henneman. Patient Educ Couns 2008
52
11

Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception.
Silvia van Dooren, Adriana J Rijnsburger, Caroline Seynaeve, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst, Harry J de Koning, Aad Tibben. Eur J Cancer 2004
42
14

The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: reliability and validity of the instrument.
Ellen M A Smets, Arwen H Pieterse, Cora M Aalfs, Margreet G E M Ausems, Alexandra M van Dulmen. Am J Med Genet A 2006
35
17


Initial cancer genetic counseling consultation: change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, and association with addressing their needs and preferences.
Arwen H Pieterse, Margreet G E M Ausems, Alexandra M Van Dulmen, Frits A Beemer, Jozien M Bensing. Am J Med Genet A 2005
59
10

Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic-counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA 1/2-test results.
J Vos, J C Oosterwijk, E Gómez-García, F H Menko, A M Jansen, R D Stoel, C J van Asperen, A Tibben, A M Stiggelbout. Clin Genet 2011
32
18

Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information.
Paul Bennett, Clare Wilkinson, Jim Turner, Kate Brain, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Gethin Griffith, Barbara France, Jonathon Gray. J Genet Couns 2008
29
20

Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result.
Joël Vos, Encarna Gómez-García, Jan C Oosterwijk, Fred H Menko, Reinoud D Stoel, Christi J van Asperen, Anna M Jansen, Anne M Stiggelbout, Aad Tibben. Psychooncology 2012
48
12


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.