A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Importance of phase alignment for interocular suppression.
Goro Maehara, Pi-Chun Huang, Robert F Hess. Vision Res 2009
Times Cited: 12






Login to export Results
Don't have an account? Register here

List of co-cited articles
77 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages.
Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Christof Koch. Nat Neurosci 2005
549
10
83

Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.
Eunice Yang, Randolph Blake. J Vis 2012
92
9
75

Interocular suppression differentially affects achromatic and chromatic mechanisms.
Sang Wook Hong, Randolph Blake. Atten Percept Psychophys 2009
43
8
66

Processing of invisible stimuli: advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression.
Yi Jiang, Patricia Costello, Sheng He. Psychol Sci 2007
223
8
66

Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
Timo Stein, Martin N Hebart, Philipp Sterzer. Front Hum Neurosci 2011
133
8
66

Moving stimuli are less effectively masked using traditional continuous flash suppression (CFS) compared to a moving Mondrian mask (MMM): a test case for feature-selective suppression and retinotopic adaptation.
Pieter Moors, Johan Wagemans, Lee de-Wit. PLoS One 2014
20
6
50

Visual competition.
Randolph Blake, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
813
5
41

Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry.
Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Christof Koch, Lee A Gilroy, Randolph Blake. J Vis 2006
141
5
41

Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity.
David Alais, David Melcher. Vision Res 2007
72
5
41

Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.
Daniel H Baker, Erich W Graf. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009
55
4
33

Gaze-induced joint attention persists under high perceptual load and does not depend on awareness.
Shan Xu, Shen Zhang, Haiyan Geng. Vision Res 2011
33
4
33

Neural bases of binocular rivalry.
Frank Tong, Ming Meng, Randolph Blake. Trends Cogn Sci 2006
384
4
33

Unconscious processing under interocular suppression: getting the right measure.
Timo Stein, Philipp Sterzer. Front Psychol 2014
59
4
33

PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.
Jonathan W Peirce. J Neurosci Methods 2007
1887
4
33

On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness.
Eunice Yang, Jan Brascamp, Min-Suk Kang, Randolph Blake. Front Psychol 2014
77
4
33

The temporal frequency tuning of continuous flash suppression reveals peak suppression at very low frequencies.
Shui'er Han, Claudia Lunghi, David Alais. Sci Rep 2016
21
4
33

Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.
Zhicheng Lin, Sheng He. Prog Neurobiol 2009
129
3
25

A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images.
Yi Jiang, Patricia Costello, Fang Fang, Miner Huang, Sheng He. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006
173
3
25

Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways.
Fang Fang, Sheng He. Nat Neurosci 2005
274
3
25

Multistage model for binocular rivalry.
Alan W Freeman. J Neurophysiol 2005
123
3
25

Semantic and subword priming during binocular suppression.
Patricia Costello, Yi Jiang, Brandon Baartman, Kristine McGlennen, Sheng He. Conscious Cogn 2009
78
3
25

Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression.
Eunice Yang, David H Zald, Randolph Blake. Emotion 2007
221
3
25

Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.
Jeffrey N Rouder, Paul L Speckman, Dongchu Sun, Richard D Morey, Geoffrey Iverson. Psychon Bull Rev 2009
1697
3
25

Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield.
Surya Gayet, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Chris L E Paffen. Front Psychol 2014
102
3
25

Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy.
Jonathan W Peirce. Front Neuroinform 2009
708
3
25

Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review.
Philipp Sterzer, Timo Stein, Karin Ludwig, Marcus Rothkirch, Guido Hesselmann. Front Psychol 2014
84
3
25

Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry.
T A Carlson, S He. Curr Biol 2000
32
3
25

Waves of visibility: probing the depth of inter-ocular suppression with transient and sustained targets.
Lisandro N Kaunitz, Alessio Fracasso, Māris Skujevskis, David Melcher. Front Psychol 2014
16
3
25

Time for Awareness: The Influence of Temporal Properties of the Mask on Continuous Flash Suppression Effectiveness.
Weina Zhu, Jan Drewes, David Melcher. PLoS One 2016
24
3
25

Cortical responses to invisible faces: dissociating subsystems for facial-information processing.
Yi Jiang, Sheng He. Curr Biol 2006
202
2
16

Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible 'invisible'.
Chai-Youn Kim, Randolph Blake. Trends Cogn Sci 2005
253
2
16

Binocular rivalry and semantic processing: out of sight, out of mind.
L D Zimba, R Blake. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1983
48
2
16

Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.
D G Pelli. J Opt Soc Am A 1985
516
2
16

A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for human contrast discrimination.
Robbe L T Goris, Felix A Wichmann, G Bruce Henning. J Vis 2009
24
2
16

Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions.
G E Legge. J Opt Soc Am 1979
122
2
16

Contrast sensitivity in natural scenes depends on edge as well as spatial frequency structure.
Peter J Bex, Samuel G Solomon, Steven C Dakin. J Vis 2009
85
2
16

Grating and plaid masks indicate linear summation in a contrast gain pool.
David J Holmes, Tim S Meese. J Vis 2004
35
2
16

Contrast masking in human vision.
G E Legge, J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am 1980
633
2
16

Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.
D H Baker, T S Meese, R J Summers. Neuroscience 2007
82
2
16

Pattern detection in the presence of maskers that differ in spatial phase and temporal offset: threshold measurements and a model.
J M Foley, C C Chen. Vision Res 1999
47
2
16

Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model.
J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994
372
2
16

Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.
Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson, Daniel H Baker. J Vis 2006
185
2
16

Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision.
J M Foley, G E Legge. Vision Res 1981
182
2
16

Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection.
J Nachmias, R V Sansbury. Vision Res 1974
330
2
16

Some observations on the pedestal effect.
G Bruce Henning, Felix A Wichmann. J Vis 2007
20
2
16

A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. Psychon Bull Rev 2007
1012
2
16

What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis.
John K Kruschke. Trends Cogn Sci 2010
116
2
16

Unseen complex motion is modulated by attention and generates a visible aftereffect.
Lisandro Kaunitz, Alessio Fracasso, David Melcher. J Vis 2011
38
2
16

Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression.
Sjoerd M Stuit, John Cass, Chris L E Paffen, David Alais. J Vis 2009
31
2
16

Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects.
Kazushi Maruya, Hiroki Watanabe, Masataka Watanabe. J Vis 2008
49
2
16


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.

Longstocking, LLC. © 2021
Home | About Us | FAQs | Terms & Privacy