A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2009
Times Cited: 88







List of co-cited articles
603 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
350
32

Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.
Sharon Hensley Alford, Colleen M McBride, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Public Health Genomics 2011
80
31

Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
152
26

Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics.
Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Nat Genet 2008
67
28



Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Laura Ornowski, Elana Silver, Michele Cargill, Vance Vanier, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. Genet Med 2010
89
19

Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
115
19


Considerations for designing a prototype genetic test for use in translational research.
C H Wade, C M McBride, S L R Kardia, L C Brody. Public Health Genomics 2010
20
70

Consumers' use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing.
Kimberly A Kaphingst, Colleen M McBride, Christopher Wade, Sharon Hensley Alford, Lawrence C Brody, Andreas D Baxevanis. J Med Internet Res 2010
47
29


An agenda for personalized medicine.
Pauline C Ng, Sarah S Murray, Samuel Levy, J Craig Venter. Nature 2009
195
14

The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
158
14

Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.
Christina R Lachance, Lori A H Erby, Beth M Ford, Vincent C Allen, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Genet Med 2010
68
19

Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing.
Sarah E Gollust, Sara Chandros Hull, Benjamin S Wilfond. JAMA 2002
115
13

The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop.
Muin J Khoury, Colleen M McBride, Sheri D Schully, John P A Ioannidis, W Gregory Feero, A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Denise G Simons-Morton, Jay M Bernhardt, Michele Cargill,[...]. Genet Med 2009
152
13

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
228
13


Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review.
Maren T Scheuner, Pauline Sieverding, Paul G Shekelle. JAMA 2008
215
13

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
87
13

Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.
Theresa M Marteau, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A T Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Clare Watkinson, Sophie Attwood, Gareth J Hollands. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010
197
13

A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.
Lynn F Cherkas, Juliette M Harris, Elana Levinson, Tim D Spector, Barbara Prainsack. PLoS One 2010
76
14

Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Marcie A Lambrix. New Genet Soc 2010
70
15

Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?
David J Hunter, Muin J Khoury, Jeffrey M Drazen. N Engl J Med 2008
260
11

Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.
Serena Chao, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Rebecca Silliman, L Adrienne Cupples, Robert C Green. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2008
164
11



Genetic risk prediction--are we there yet?
Peter Kraft, David J Hunter. N Engl J Med 2009
288
10

Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.
Katrina A B Goddard, Debra Duquette, Amy Zlot, Jenny Johnson, Ann Annis-Emeott, Patrick W Lee, Mary Pat Bland, Karen L Edwards, Kristin Oehlke, Rebecca T Giles,[...]. Am J Public Health 2009
36
25

What can interest tell us about uptake of genetic testing? Intention and behavior amongst smokers related to patients with lung cancer.
S C Sanderson, S C O'Neill, L A Bastian, G Bepler, C M McBride. Public Health Genomics 2010
61
14


Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.
Colleen M McBride, Christopher H Wade, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2010
55
16

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
117
10


Responses to online GSTM1 genetic test results among smokers related to patients with lung cancer: a pilot study.
Saskia C Sanderson, Suzanne C O'Neill, Della Brown White, Gerold Bepler, Lori Bastian, Isaac M Lipkus, Colleen M McBride. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009
41
19

Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.
C Molster, T Charles, A Samanek, P O'Leary. Public Health Genomics 2009
82
9

Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income.
Colleen M McBride, Gerold Bepler, Isaac M Lipkus, Pauline Lyna, Greg Samsa, Jennifer Albright, Santanu Datta, Barbara K Rimer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002
142
9

Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information.
Morris W Foster, John J Mulvihill, Richard R Sharp. Genet Med 2009
128
9


Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.
Robert C Green, J Scott Roberts, L Adrienne Cupples, Norman R Relkin, Peter J Whitehouse, Tamsen Brown, Susan LaRusse Eckert, Melissa Butson, A Dessa Sadovnick, Kimberly A Quaid,[...]. N Engl J Med 2009
320
9


A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions.
A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Linda A Bradley, Ben A Oostra, Cornelia M van Duijn, Muin J Khoury. Am J Hum Genet 2008
167
9

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?
T Caulfield, N M Ries, P N Ray, C Shuman, B Wilson. Clin Genet 2010
51
15

Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.
Sarah E Gollust, Benjamin S Wilfond, Sara Chandros Hull. Genet Med 2003
86
9



Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs.
Kathryn T Hock, Kurt D Christensen, Beverly M Yashar, J Scott Roberts, Sarah E Gollust, Wendy R Uhlmann. Genet Med 2011
43
18

Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions.
Suzanne C O'Neill, Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Ann Behav Med 2010
27
29

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.
Lesley Goldsmith, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
63
12


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.