A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Public Health 2009
Times Cited: 115







List of co-cited articles
498 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models.
Christian M Simon, Jamie L'heureux, Jeffrey C Murray, Patricia Winokur, George Weiner, Elizabeth Newbury, Laura Shinkunas, Bridget Zimmerman. Genet Med 2011
105
24

Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
174
21

Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
171
21

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
204
18


Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?
Mats G Hansson, Joakim Dillner, Claus R Bartram, Joyce A Carlson, Gert Helgesson. Lancet Oncol 2006
230
15


Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
159
13

Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.
David M Secko, Nina Preto, Simon Niemeyer, Michael M Burgess. Soc Sci Med 2009
83
14

Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Scand J Public Health 2004
138
12

Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke. Genet Med 2010
136
12


Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions.
Laura M Beskow, Elizabeth Dean. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008
86
12

Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials.
Paul R Helft, Victoria L Champion, Rachael Eckles, Cynthia S Johnson, Eric M Meslin. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2007
39
28

Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.
Laura M Beskow, Joëlle Y Friedman, N Chantelle Hardy, Li Lin, Kevin P Weinfurt. PLoS One 2010
60
18

Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey.
Gail E Henderson, R Jean Cadigan, Teresa P Edwards, Ian Conlon, Anders G Nelson, James P Evans, Arlene M Davis, Catherine Zimmer, Bryan J Weiner. Genome Med 2013
128
11

Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.
Geraldine M McQuillan, Kathryn S Porter, Maria Agelli, Raynard Kington. Genet Med 2003
125
10

Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?
Donna T Chen, Donald L Rosenstein, Palaniappan Muthappan, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Franklin G Miller, Ezekiel J Emanuel, David Wendler. Arch Intern Med 2005
81
12

Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.
John S Luque, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Francisco A Montel-Ishino, Mariana Arevalo, Shalanda A Bynum, Shalewa Noel-Thomas, Kristen J Wells, Clement K Gwede, Cathy D Meade. J Cancer Educ 2012
69
14

Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking.
Zubin Master, Jaime O Claudio, Christen Rachul, Jean C Y Wang, Mark D Minden, Timothy Caulfield. BMC Med Genomics 2013
35
28

Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research.
Jodyn Platt, Juli Bollinger, Rachel Dvoskin, Sharon L R Kardia, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
54
18


Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients.
Rebecca D Pentz, Laurent Billot, David Wendler. Am J Med Genet A 2006
68
13

Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank.
Kyle B Brothers, Daniel R Morrison, Ellen W Clayton. Am J Med Genet A 2011
51
17

Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus.
Zubin Master, Erin Nelson, Blake Murdoch, Timothy Caulfield. Nat Methods 2012
54
16

Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
221
9


Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
281
8


Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
105
8

DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives.
Amy L McGuire, Jennifer A Hamilton, Rebecca Lunstroth, Laurence B McCullough, Alica Goldman. Genet Med 2008
75
10

Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.
Jill M Pulley, Margaret M Brace, Gordon R Bernard, Dan R Masys. Cell Tissue Bank 2008
74
10

Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns.
Aaro Tupasela, Sinikka Sihvo, Karolna Snell, Pa Jallinoja, Arja R Aro, Elina Hemminki. Scand J Public Health 2010
49
16

Ethics and biobanks.
M G Hansson. Br J Cancer 2009
105
8

Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?
Kristin Solum Steinsbekk, Bjørn Kåre Myskja, Berge Solberg. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
122
8

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
302
8

Patients' refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study.
Linus Johnsson, Mats G Hansson, Stefan Eriksson, Gert Helgesson. BMJ 2008
45
15

The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent.
Klaus Hoeyer, Bert-Ove Olofsson, Tom Mjörndal, Niels Lynöe. Arch Intern Med 2005
70
10

Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire, Mildred Cho, Janet A Buchanan, Michael M Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk, Christina M Diaz, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Shane K Green, Marc A Hodosh,[...]. PLoS Biol 2008
156
7

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
469
7

Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine.
D M Roden, J M Pulley, M A Basford, G R Bernard, E W Clayton, J R Balser, D R Masys. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008
544
7



Banking together. A unified model of informed consent for biobanking.
Elena Salvaterra, Lucilla Lecchi, Silvia Giovanelli, Barbara Butti, Maria Teresa Bardella, Pier Alberto Bertazzi, Silvano Bosari, Guido Coggi, Domenico A Coviello, Faustina Lalatta,[...]. EMBO Rep 2008
61
11


Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.
A Cambon-Thomsen, E Rial-Sebbag, B M Knoppers. Eur Respir J 2007
156
7

Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
Judy Allen, Beverley McNamara. Bioethics 2011
47
14


Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?
B Hofmann. J Med Ethics 2009
96
7



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.