A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Christina R Lachance, Lori A H Erby, Beth M Ford, Vincent C Allen, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Genet. Med. 2010
Times Cited: 60







List of co-cited articles
322 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Citation     Count
Similarity


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011
307
33

Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
143
26

The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
123
25

Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.
Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet. Med. 2009
83
21

Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.
Colleen M McBride, Christopher H Wade, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2010
49
26

Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
Amanda Singleton, Lori Hamby Erby, Kathryn V Foisie, Kimberly A Kaphingst. J Genet Couns 2012
31
41

Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
97
20

ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States.
Kathy Hudson, Gail Javitt, Wylie Burke, Peter Byers. Obstet Gynecol 2007
76
18

Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?
David J Hunter, Muin J Khoury, Jeffrey M Drazen. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008
228
18


The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
72
18



Science and regulation. Regulating direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Barbara J Evans, Timothy Caulfield, Wylie Burke. Science 2010
24
41

Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Laura Ornowski, Elana Silver, Michele Cargill, Vance Vanier, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. Genet. Med. 2010
77
16

A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions.
A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Linda A Bradley, Ben A Oostra, Cornelia M van Duijn, Muin J Khoury. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008
146
15

An agenda for personalized medicine.
Pauline C Ng, Sarah S Murray, Samuel Levy, J Craig Venter. Nature 2009
175
15


Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Marcie A Lambrix. New Genet Soc 2010
65
15

Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing.
Sarah E Gollust, Sara Chandros Hull, Benjamin S Wilfond. JAMA 2002
100
13


Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome-wide scans.
Raluca Mihaescu, Mandy van Hoek, Eric J G Sijbrands, AndrĂ© G Uitterlinden, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Albert Hofman, Cornelia M van Duijn, A Cecile J W Janssens. Genet. Med. 2009
50
16

Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services.
Kenta Imai, Larry J Kricka, Paolo Fortina. Clin. Chem. 2011
41
19

Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.
Sarah E Gollust, Benjamin S Wilfond, Sara Chandros Hull. Genet. Med. 2003
77
13

A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.
Lynn F Cherkas, Juliette M Harris, Elana Levinson, Tim D Spector, Barbara Prainsack. PLoS ONE 2010
66
13

Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics.
Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Nat. Genet. 2008
60
11


Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Monica A Giovanni, Matthew R Fickie, Lisa S Lehmann, Robert C Green, Lisa M Meckley, David Veenstra, Michael F Murray. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010
35
20

Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.
Theresa M Marteau, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A T Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Clare Watkinson, Sophie Attwood, Gareth J Hollands. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010
176
11


Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire. Annu. Rev. Med. 2012
55
12

Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organization: a naturally-occurring experiment.
Judy Mouchawar, Sharon Hensley-Alford, Suzanne Laurion, Jennifer Ellis, Alanna Kulchak-Rahm, Melissa L Finucane, Richard Meenan, Lisen Axell, Rebecca Pollack, Debra Ritzwoller. Genet. Med. 2005
62
10

The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop.
Muin J Khoury, Colleen M McBride, Sheri D Schully, John P A Ioannidis, W Gregory Feero, A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Denise G Simons-Morton, Jay M Bernhardt, Michele Cargill,[...]. Genet. Med. 2009
136
10

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet. Med. 2008
195
10






Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs.
Kathryn T Hock, Kurt D Christensen, Beverly M Yashar, J Scott Roberts, Sarah E Gollust, Wendy R Uhlmann. Genet. Med. 2011
40
15

Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.
Katrina A B Goddard, Debra Duquette, Amy Zlot, Jenny Johnson, Ann Annis-Emeott, Patrick W Lee, Mary Pat Bland, Karen L Edwards, Kristin Oehlke, Rebecca T Giles,[...]. Am J Public Health 2009
30
20

Health system implications of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Wylie Burke. Public Health Genomics 2011
23
26


Preconceptional genetic carrier testing and the commercial offer directly-to-consumers.
Pascal Borry, Lidewij Henneman, Phillis Lakeman, Leo P ten Kate, Martina C Cornel, Heidi C Howard. Hum. Reprod. 2011
53
11

Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.
Susanne B Haga, Madeline M Carrig, Julianne M O'Daniel, Lori A Orlando, Ley A Killeya-Jones, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Alex Cho. J Gen Intern Med 2011
46
13

Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Burcu F Darst, Eric J Topol, Nicholas J Schork. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011
59
10

Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.
D H Lea, K A Kaphingst, D Bowen, I Lipkus, D W Hadley. Public Health Genomics 2011
109
10

Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.
Serena Chao, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Rebecca Silliman, L Adrienne Cupples, Robert C Green. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2008
127
8

Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.
C Molster, T Charles, A Samanek, P O'Leary. Public Health Genomics 2009
61
8

Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.
Robert C Green, J Scott Roberts, L Adrienne Cupples, Norman R Relkin, Peter J Whitehouse, Tamsen Brown, Susan LaRusse Eckert, Melissa Butson, A Dessa Sadovnick, Kimberly A Quaid,[...]. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009
268
8


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.