A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Mark Weir, Karine Morin, Nola Ries, David Castle. Br J Nutr 2010
Times Cited: 21







List of co-cited articles
124 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Nutrigenomics - perspectives from registered dietitians: a report from the Quebec-wide e-consultation on nutrigenomics among registered dietitians.
H Cormier, B L Tremblay, A-M Paradis, V Garneau, S Desroches, J Robitaille, M-C Vohl. J Hum Nutr Diet 2014
22
33


Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutritional genomics.
Kathryn M Camp, Elaine Trujillo. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014
44
28

Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
347
23

Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers.
Barbara J Stewart-Knox, Brendan P Bunting, Sarah Gilpin, Heather J Parr, Silvia Pinhão, J J Strain, Maria D V de Almeida, Mike Gibney. Br J Nutr 2009
54
23

A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.
Lynn F Cherkas, Juliette M Harris, Elana Levinson, Tim D Spector, Barbara Prainsack. PLoS One 2010
75
23

Genetics and diet--gene interactions: involvement, confidence and knowledge of dietitians.
Kevin Whelan, Sarah McCarthy, Maria Pufulete. Br J Nutr 2008
18
27

Awareness and use of direct-to-consumer nutrigenomic tests, United States, 2006.
Katrina A B Goddard, Cynthia Moore, Denae Ottman, Kathleen L Szegda, Linda Bradley, Muin J Khoury. Genet Med 2007
40
19



Continuing education needs of registered dietitians regarding nutrigenomics.
Renee Rosen, Carrie Earthman, Len Marquart, Marla Reicks. J Am Diet Assoc 2006
16
25

Risks of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics? What the scientists say.
T Hurlimann, V Menuz, J Graham, J Robitaille, M-C Vohl, B Godard. Genes Nutr 2014
13
30

Do we know enough? A scientific and ethical analysis of the basis for genetic-based personalized nutrition.
Ulf Görman, John C Mathers, Keith A Grimaldi, Jennie Ahlgren, Karin Nordström. Genes Nutr 2013
29
19

Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalized Nutrition: Part 2 - Ethics, Challenges and Endeavors of Precision Nutrition.
Martin Kohlmeier, Raffaele De Caterina, Lynnette R Ferguson, Ulf Görman, Hooman Allayee, Chandan Prasad, Jing X Kang, Carolina Ferreira Nicoletti, J Alfredo Martinez. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics 2016
40
19

Opportunities for training for nutritional professionals in nutritional genomics: What is out there?
Jorja Collins, Melissa M Adamski, Cliona Twohig, Chiara Murgia. Nutr Diet 2018
10
40

Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice.
Keith A Grimaldi, Ben van Ommen, Jose M Ordovas, Laurence D Parnell, John C Mathers, Igor Bendik, Lorraine Brennan, Carlos Celis-Morales, Elisa Cirillo, Hannelore Daniel,[...]. Genes Nutr 2017
52
19

Personalised nutrition: status and perspectives.
Hans-Georg Joost, Michael J Gibney, Kevin D Cashman, Ulf Görman, John E Hesketh, Michael Mueller, Ben van Ommen, Christine M Williams, John C Mathers. Br J Nutr 2007
44
14

Improved weight management using genetic information to personalize a calorie controlled diet.
Ioannis Arkadianos, Ana M Valdes, Efstathios Marinos, Anna Florou, Rosalynn D Gill, Keith A Grimaldi. Nutr J 2007
70
14

Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.
Christina R Lachance, Lori A H Erby, Beth M Ford, Vincent C Allen, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Genet Med 2010
68
14

Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
112
14

Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.
Katrina A B Goddard, Debra Duquette, Amy Zlot, Jenny Johnson, Ann Annis-Emeott, Patrick W Lee, Mary Pat Bland, Karen L Edwards, Kristin Oehlke, Rebecca T Giles,[...]. Am J Public Health 2009
36
14

A randomized trial of genetic information for personalized nutrition.
Daiva E Nielsen, Ahmed El-Sohemy. Genes Nutr 2012
53
14

An epidemiologic-based survey of public attitudes towards predictive genetic testing in Russia.
Oksana A Makeeva, Valentina V Markova, Allen D Roses, Valery P Puzyrev. Per Med 2010
18
16

Consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition.
A Ronteltap, J C M van Trijp, R J Renes. Br J Nutr 2009
27
14

The gap between practice and genetics education of health professionals: HuGEM survey results.
E V Lapham, C Kozma, J O Weiss, J L Benkendorf, M A Wilson. Genet Med 2000
43
14

Incorporating human genetics into dietetics curricula remains a challenge.
Connie E Vickery, Nancy Cotugna. J Am Diet Assoc 2005
12
25


Consumers on the Internet: ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition.
Jennie Ahlgren, Anders Nordgren, Maud Perrudin, Amber Ronteltap, Jean Savigny, Hans van Trijp, Karin Nordström, Ulf Görman. Genes Nutr 2013
15
20

Evidence that personal genome testing enhances student learning in a course on genomics and personalized medicine.
Keyan Salari, Konrad J Karczewski, Louanne Hudgins, Kelly E Ormond. PLoS One 2013
62
14


Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nathan E Wineinger, Burcu F Darst, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. J Med Genet 2013
102
14

Perceptions of genetic testing for personalized nutrition: a randomized trial of DNA-based dietary advice.
Daiva E Nielsen, Sarah Shih, Ahmed El-Sohemy. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics 2014
20
15




Bioethical considerations for human nutrigenomics.
Manuela M Bergmann, Ulf Görman, John C Mathers. Annu Rev Nutr 2008
14
14

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?
T Caulfield, N M Ries, P N Ray, C Shuman, B Wilson. Clin Genet 2010
51
9

CYP1A2 genotype modifies the association between coffee intake and the risk of hypertension.
Paolo Palatini, Giulio Ceolotto, Fabio Ragazzo, Francesca Dorigatti, Francesca Saladini, Italia Papparella, Lucio Mos, Giuseppe Zanata, Massimo Santonastaso. J Hypertens 2009
116
9

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
84
9

Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.
Serena Chao, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Rebecca Silliman, L Adrienne Cupples, Robert C Green. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2008
162
9

Functional genetic variants of glutathione S-transferase protect against serum ascorbic acid deficiency.
Leah E Cahill, Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson, Ahmed El-Sohemy. Am J Clin Nutr 2009
43
9

Media coverage of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
John Lynch, Ashley Parrott, Robert J Hopkin, Melanie Myers. J Genet Couns 2011
13
15


Coffee, CYP1A2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction.
Marilyn C Cornelis, Ahmed El-Sohemy, Edmond K Kabagambe, Hannia Campos. JAMA 2006
255
9

Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
152
9

Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome-wide scans.
Raluca Mihaescu, Mandy van Hoek, Eric J G Sijbrands, André G Uitterlinden, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Albert Hofman, Cornelia M van Duijn, A Cecile J W Janssens. Genet Med 2009
51
9

Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection.
Bibiana Garcia-Bailo, Clare Toguri, Karen M Eny, Ahmed El-Sohemy. OMICS 2009
133
9


An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
A Cecile Jw Janssens, Cornelia M van Duijn. Investig Genet 2010
33
9


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.