A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Cinnamon S Bloss, Laura Ornowski, Elana Silver, Michele Cargill, Vance Vanier, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. Genet Med 2010
Times Cited: 88







List of co-cited articles
466 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
343
40

Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
152
31


Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
110
27

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
112
21

A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.
Lynn F Cherkas, Juliette M Harris, Elana Levinson, Tim D Spector, Barbara Prainsack. PLoS One 2010
75
22

Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.
Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2009
87
19

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
84
20

Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Marcie A Lambrix. New Genet Soc 2010
69
23

Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.
Colleen M McBride, Christopher H Wade, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2010
55
27


The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
153
15

Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.
Robert C Green, J Scott Roberts, L Adrienne Cupples, Norman R Relkin, Peter J Whitehouse, Tamsen Brown, Susan LaRusse Eckert, Melissa Butson, A Dessa Sadovnick, Kimberly A Quaid,[...]. N Engl J Med 2009
306
14

An agenda for personalized medicine.
Pauline C Ng, Sarah S Murray, Samuel Levy, J Craig Venter. Nature 2009
195
14

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.
Lesley Goldsmith, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
61
21


Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nathan E Wineinger, Burcu F Darst, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. J Med Genet 2013
100
13

A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing.
Jodi T Heshka, Crystal Palleschi, Heather Howley, Brenda Wilson, Philip S Wells. Genet Med 2008
219
12

Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.
Theresa M Marteau, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A T Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Clare Watkinson, Sophie Attwood, Gareth J Hollands. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010
197
12


Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.
Christina R Lachance, Lori A H Erby, Beth M Ford, Vincent C Allen, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Genet Med 2010
67
16

Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market.
Caroline F Wright, Shelley Gregory-Jones. Genet Med 2010
29
34

Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Burcu F Darst, Eric J Topol, Nicholas J Schork. Hum Mol Genet 2011
60
16

Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Karen P Powell, Whitney A Cogswell, Carol A Christianson, Gaurav Dave, Amit Verma, Sonja Eubanks, Vincent C Henrich. J Genet Couns 2012
64
15


Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?
David J Hunter, Muin J Khoury, Jeffrey M Drazen. N Engl J Med 2008
258
10

Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.
Sharon Hensley Alford, Colleen M McBride, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Public Health Genomics 2011
76
11

A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions.
A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Linda A Bradley, Ben A Oostra, Cornelia M van Duijn, Muin J Khoury. Am J Hum Genet 2008
167
10

Science and regulation. Regulating direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Barbara J Evans, Timothy Caulfield, Wylie Burke. Science 2010
25
36

Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Monica A Giovanni, Matthew R Fickie, Lisa S Lehmann, Robert C Green, Lisa M Meckley, David Veenstra, Michael F Murray. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010
38
23

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs.
Kathryn T Hock, Kurt D Christensen, Beverly M Yashar, J Scott Roberts, Sarah E Gollust, Wendy R Uhlmann. Genet Med 2011
43
20




The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop.
Muin J Khoury, Colleen M McBride, Sheri D Schully, John P A Ioannidis, W Gregory Feero, A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Denise G Simons-Morton, Jay M Bernhardt, Michele Cargill,[...]. Genet Med 2009
150
9

Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006.
Katrina A B Goddard, Debra Duquette, Amy Zlot, Jenny Johnson, Ann Annis-Emeott, Patrick W Lee, Mary Pat Bland, Karen L Edwards, Kristin Oehlke, Rebecca T Giles,[...]. Am J Public Health 2009
36
22


Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.
Susanne B Haga, Madeline M Carrig, Julianne M O'Daniel, Lori A Orlando, Ley A Killeya-Jones, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Alex Cho. J Gen Intern Med 2011
53
15

Awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic tests and use of genetic tests among Puerto Rican adults, 2009.
Ana Patricia Ortiz, Magdalena López, Libertad T Flores, Marievelisse Soto-Salgado, Lila J Finney Rutten, Ruby A Serrano-Rodriguez, Bradford W Hesse, Guillermo Tortolero-Luna. Prev Chronic Dis 2011
15
53

Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.
Kimberly A Kaphingst, Colleen M McBride, Christopher Wade, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert Reid, Eric Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2012
84
9

Experiences of early users of direct-to-consumer genomics in Switzerland: an exploratory study.
E Vayena, E Gourna, J Streuli, E Hafen, B Prainsack. Public Health Genomics 2012
36
22

Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome-wide scans.
Raluca Mihaescu, Mandy van Hoek, Eric J G Sijbrands, André G Uitterlinden, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Albert Hofman, Cornelia M van Duijn, A Cecile J W Janssens. Genet Med 2009
51
13

Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review.
Maren T Scheuner, Pauline Sieverding, Paul G Shekelle. JAMA 2008
211
7


An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
A Cecile Jw Janssens, Cornelia M van Duijn. Investig Genet 2010
32
21



Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.
Sarah E Gollust, Benjamin S Wilfond, Sara Chandros Hull. Genet Med 2003
86
8


Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services.
Kenta Imai, Larry J Kricka, Paolo Fortina. Clin Chem 2011
43
16


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.