A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Monica A Giovanni, Matthew R Fickie, Lisa S Lehmann, Robert C Green, Lisa M Meckley, David Veenstra, Michael F Murray. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2010
Times Cited: 40







List of co-cited articles
229 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. N Engl J Med 2011
353
35

Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Christina M Diaz, Tao Wang, Susan G Hilsenbeck. Am J Bioeth 2009
154
32

Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.
S E Gollust, E S Gordon, C Zayac, G Griffin, M F Christman, R E Pyeritz, L Wawak, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
117
32

An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.
Gemma R Brett, Sylvia A Metcalfe, David J Amor, Jane L Halliday. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
37
35


The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.
Stuart Hogarth, Gail Javitt, David Melzer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008
159
30

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefs.
Kathryn T Hock, Kurt D Christensen, Beverly M Yashar, J Scott Roberts, Sarah E Gollust, Wendy R Uhlmann. Genet Med 2011
46
30

Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Karen P Powell, Whitney A Cogswell, Carol A Christianson, Gaurav Dave, Amit Verma, Sonja Eubanks, Vincent C Henrich. J Genet Couns 2012
66
30

Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.
David J Kaufman, Juli M Bollinger, Rachel L Dvoskin, Joan A Scott. J Genet Couns 2012
118
27

Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early users.
Michelle L McGowan, Jennifer R Fishman, Marcie A Lambrix. New Genet Soc 2010
70
22

Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Laura Ornowski, Elana Silver, Michele Cargill, Vance Vanier, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. Genet Med 2010
89
22


An agenda for personalized medicine.
Pauline C Ng, Sarah S Murray, Samuel Levy, J Craig Venter. Nature 2009
195
20

Concordance study of 3 direct-to-consumer genetic-testing services.
Kenta Imai, Larry J Kricka, Paolo Fortina. Clin Chem 2011
45
20

The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.
J W Leighton, K Valverde, B A Bernhardt. Public Health Genomics 2012
90
20

Physicians' opinion for 'new' genetic testing in Japan.
Takako Ohata, Atsushi Tsuchiya, Maiko Watanabe, Tomohisa Sumida, Fumio Takada. J Hum Genet 2009
23
34


Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.
Pascal Borry, Rachel E van Hellemondt, Dominique Sprumont, Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Tade Matthias Spranger, Liam Curren, Jane Kaye, Herman Nys, Heidi Howard. Eur J Hum Genet 2012
72
20

Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.
Christina R Lachance, Lori A H Erby, Beth M Ford, Vincent C Allen, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Genet Med 2010
69
17




Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.
Theresa M Marteau, David P French, Simon J Griffin, A T Prevost, Stephen Sutton, Clare Watkinson, Sophie Attwood, Gareth J Hollands. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010
201
17

A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions.
A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Linda A Bradley, Ben A Oostra, Cornelia M van Duijn, Muin J Khoury. Am J Hum Genet 2008
167
17

Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.
Susanne B Haga, Madeline M Carrig, Julianne M O'Daniel, Lori A Orlando, Ley A Killeya-Jones, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Alex Cho. J Gen Intern Med 2011
59
17

Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.
Colleen M McBride, Christopher H Wade, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2010
55
15

Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.
Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Robert J Reid, Eric B Larson, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody. Genet Med 2009
88
15

ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States.
Kathy Hudson, Gail Javitt, Wylie Burke, Peter Byers. Obstet Gynecol 2007
88
15

Health system implications of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Amy L McGuire, Wylie Burke. Public Health Genomics 2011
28
21

Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
Amanda Singleton, Lori Hamby Erby, Kathryn V Foisie, Kimberly A Kaphingst. J Genet Couns 2012
41
15

Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Cara Zayac, Erynn S Gordon, Lisa Wawak, Reed E Pyeritz, Sarah E Gollust. Per Med 2012
29
20

Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: beyond medical regulation?
David Magnus, Mildred K Cho, Robert Cook-Deegan. Genome Med 2009
24
20


Regulating direct-to-consumer genetic tests: what is all the fuss about?
Caroline F Wright, Alison Hall, Ron L Zimmern. Genet Med 2011
23
21

Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market.
Caroline F Wright, Shelley Gregory-Jones. Genet Med 2010
29
17



Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing.
Sarah E Gollust, Sara Chandros Hull, Benjamin S Wilfond. JAMA 2002
115
12



"It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.
Erynn S Gordon, Georgia Griffin, Lisa Wawak, Hauchie Pang, Sarah E Gollust, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2012
48
12

Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Karen P Powell, Carol A Christianson, Whitney A Cogswell, Gaurav Dave, Amit Verma, Sonja Eubanks, Vincent C Henrich. J Genet Couns 2012
39
12

Association between health-service use and multiplex genetic testing.
Robert J Reid, Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Cristofer Price, Andreas D Baxevanis, Lawrence C Brody, Eric B Larson. Genet Med 2012
31
16

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.
Lesley Goldsmith, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton. J Community Genet 2013
31
16

Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
B F Darst, L Madlensky, N J Schork, E J Topol, C S Bloss. Clin Genet 2013
23
21

Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up.
Cinnamon S Bloss, Nathan E Wineinger, Burcu F Darst, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol. J Med Genet 2013
105
12


False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care.
Stephany Tandy-Connor, Jenna Guiltinan, Kate Krempely, Holly LaDuca, Patrick Reineke, Stephanie Gutierrez, Phillip Gray, Brigette Tippin Davis. Genet Med 2018
127
12

Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?
David J Hunter, Muin J Khoury, Jeffrey M Drazen. N Engl J Med 2008
261
10

Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information.
Morris W Foster, John J Mulvihill, Richard R Sharp. Genet Med 2009
130
10


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.