Konstantinos Tsetsos, Marius Usher, Nick Chater. Psychol Rev 2010

**Times Cited: 53**Times Cited

Times Co-cited

Similarity

Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making.

R M Roe, J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 2001

R M Roe, J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 2001

66

Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

Marius Usher, James L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2004

Marius Usher, James L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2004

62

The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model.

M Usher, J L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2001

M Usher, J L McClelland. Psychol Rev 2001

47

Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 1993

J R Busemeyer, J T Townsend. Psychol Rev 1993

39

The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice.

Jennifer S Trueblood, Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote. Psychol Rev 2014

Jennifer S Trueblood, Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote. Psychol Rev 2014

33

A range-normalization model of context-dependent choice: a new model and evidence.

Alireza Soltani, Benedetto De Martino, Colin Camerer. PLoS Comput Biol 2012

Alireza Soltani, Benedetto De Martino, Colin Camerer. PLoS Comput Biol 2012

34

Theoretical developments in decision field theory: comment on Tsetsos, Usher, and Chater (2010).

Jared M Hotaling, Jerome R Busemeyer, Jiyun Li. Psychol Rev 2010

Jared M Hotaling, Jerome R Busemeyer, Jiyun Li. Psychol Rev 2010

69

Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision making.

Jennifer S Trueblood, Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Sci 2013

Jennifer S Trueblood, Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Sci 2013

30

Multialternative context effects obtained using an inference task.

Jennifer S Trueblood. Psychon Bull Rev 2012

Jennifer S Trueblood. Psychon Bull Rev 2012

68

The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote. Cogn Psychol 2008

Scott D Brown, Andrew Heathcote. Cogn Psychol 2008

26

Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Ian Krajbich, Carrie Armel, Antonio Rangel. Nat Neurosci 2010

Ian Krajbich, Carrie Armel, Antonio Rangel. Nat Neurosci 2010

24

The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.

Rafal Bogacz, Eric Brown, Jeff Moehlis, Philip Holmes, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychol Rev 2006

Rafal Bogacz, Eric Brown, Jeff Moehlis, Philip Holmes, Jonathan D Cohen. Psychol Rev 2006

22

Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice.

Rafal Bogacz, Marius Usher, Jiaxiang Zhang, James L McClelland. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007

Rafal Bogacz, Marius Usher, Jiaxiang Zhang, James L McClelland. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007

22

22

Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal.

Konstantinos Tsetsos, Nick Chater, Marius Usher. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012

Konstantinos Tsetsos, Nick Chater, Marius Usher. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012

22

Normalization is a general neural mechanism for context-dependent decision making.

Kenway Louie, Mel W Khaw, Paul W Glimcher. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013

Kenway Louie, Mel W Khaw, Paul W Glimcher. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013

22

The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Roger Ratcliff, Gail McKoon. Neural Comput 2008

Roger Ratcliff, Gail McKoon. Neural Comput 2008

20

Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.

Nicolas A J Berkowitsch, Benjamin Scheibehenne, Jörg Rieskamp. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014

Nicolas A J Berkowitsch, Benjamin Scheibehenne, Jörg Rieskamp. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014

37

A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena.

Joseph G Johnson, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Rev 2005

Joseph G Johnson, Jerome R Busemeyer. Psychol Rev 2005

18

Does the brain calculate value?

Ivo Vlaev, Nick Chater, Neil Stewart, Gordon D A Brown. Trends Cogn Sci 2011

Ivo Vlaev, Nick Chater, Neil Stewart, Gordon D A Brown. Trends Cogn Sci 2011

18

Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence.

Konstantinos Tsetsos, Marius Usher, James L McClelland. Front Neurosci 2011

Konstantinos Tsetsos, Marius Usher, James L McClelland. Front Neurosci 2011

22

A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Roger Ratcliff, Philip L Smith. Psychol Rev 2004

Roger Ratcliff, Philip L Smith. Psychol Rev 2004

16

Normalization as a canonical neural computation.

Matteo Carandini, David J Heeger. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011

Matteo Carandini, David J Heeger. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011

16

15

Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.

Ian Krajbich, Antonio Rangel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011

Ian Krajbich, Antonio Rangel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011

15

The 2N-ary Choice Tree Model for N-Alternative Preferential Choice.

Lena M Wollschläger, Adele Diederich. Front Psychol 2012

Lena M Wollschläger, Adele Diederich. Front Psychol 2012

53

Adaptive gain control during human perceptual choice.

Samuel Cheadle, Valentin Wyart, Konstantinos Tsetsos, Nicholas Myers, Vincent de Gardelle, Santiago Herce Castañón, Christopher Summerfield. Neuron 2014

Samuel Cheadle, Valentin Wyart, Konstantinos Tsetsos, Nicholas Myers, Vincent de Gardelle, Santiago Herce Castañón, Christopher Summerfield. Neuron 2014

15

A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions.

Kong-Fatt Wong, Xiao-Jing Wang. J Neurosci 2006

Kong-Fatt Wong, Xiao-Jing Wang. J Neurosci 2006

13

Decision by sampling: the role of the decision environment in risky choice.

Neil Stewart. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2009

Neil Stewart. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2009

17

Learning the value of information in an uncertain world.

Timothy E J Behrens, Mark W Woolrich, Mark E Walton, Matthew F S Rushworth. Nat Neurosci 2007

Timothy E J Behrens, Mark W Woolrich, Mark E Walton, Matthew F S Rushworth. Nat Neurosci 2007

13

Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice.

Todd A Hare, Wolfram Schultz, Colin F Camerer, John P O'Doherty, Antonio Rangel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011

Todd A Hare, Wolfram Schultz, Colin F Camerer, John P O'Doherty, Antonio Rangel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011

13

Value normalization in decision making: theory and evidence.

Antonio Rangel, John A Clithero. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012

Antonio Rangel, John A Clithero. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012

14

Competing theories of multialternative, multiattribute preferential choice.

Brandon M Turner, Dan R Schley, Carly Muller, Konstantinos Tsetsos. Psychol Rev 2018

Brandon M Turner, Dan R Schley, Carly Muller, Konstantinos Tsetsos. Psychol Rev 2018

31

Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

M N Shadlen, W T Newsome. J Neurophysiol 2001

M N Shadlen, W T Newsome. J Neurophysiol 2001

11

Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task.

Jamie D Roitman, Michael N Shadlen. J Neurosci 2002

Jamie D Roitman, Michael N Shadlen. J Neurosci 2002

11

Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli.

J I. Gold, M N. Shadlen. Trends Cogn Sci 2001

J I. Gold, M N. Shadlen. Trends Cogn Sci 2001

11

A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Antonio Rangel, Colin Camerer, P Read Montague. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008

Antonio Rangel, Colin Camerer, P Read Montague. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008

11

Range-adapting representation of economic value in the orbitofrontal cortex.

Camillo Padoa-Schioppa. J Neurosci 2009

Camillo Padoa-Schioppa. J Neurosci 2009

11

Mechanisms underlying cortical activity during value-guided choice.

Laurence T Hunt, Nils Kolling, Alireza Soltani, Mark W Woolrich, Matthew F S Rushworth, Timothy E J Behrens. Nat Neurosci 2012

Laurence T Hunt, Nils Kolling, Alireza Soltani, Mark W Woolrich, Matthew F S Rushworth, Timothy E J Behrens. Nat Neurosci 2012

11

Examining Models of Nondominated Decoy Effects across Judgment and Choice.

Pettibone, Wedell. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2000

Pettibone, Wedell. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2000

22

Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences.

Tanya Latty, Madeleine Beekman. Proc Biol Sci 2011

Tanya Latty, Madeleine Beekman. Proc Biol Sci 2011

11

In the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects, alternatives are repeatedly compared in pairs on single dimensions.

Takao Noguchi, Neil Stewart. Cognition 2014

Takao Noguchi, Neil Stewart. Cognition 2014

22

Disentangling decision models: from independence to competition.

Andrei R Teodorescu, Marius Usher. Psychol Rev 2013

Andrei R Teodorescu, Marius Usher. Psychol Rev 2013

11

11

Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Roger Ratcliff, Philip L Smith, Scott D Brown, Gail McKoon. Trends Cogn Sci 2016

Roger Ratcliff, Philip L Smith, Scott D Brown, Gail McKoon. Trends Cogn Sci 2016

11

Integration of sensory and reward information during perceptual decision-making in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the macaque monkey.

Alan E Rorie, Juan Gao, James L McClelland, William T Newsome. PLoS One 2010

Alan E Rorie, Juan Gao, James L McClelland, William T Newsome. PLoS One 2010

9

Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.