A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
Times Cited: 149







List of co-cited articles
581 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
460
39

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
39

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
281
35

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
296
28


Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
Annelien L Bredenoord, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Johannes J M Van Delden. Hum Mutat 2011
87
25

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
220
21

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
129
20

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
201
20



Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
236
19


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
814
13


Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing.
Amy L McGuire, Timothy Caulfield, Mildred K Cho. Nat Rev Genet 2008
141
12

Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Mylène Deschênes, Ma'n H Zawati, Anne Marie Tassé. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
72
16

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
202
12

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
157
11

Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research.
Holly K Tabor, Benjamin E Berkman, Sara Chandros Hull, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2011
93
11

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
195
11


Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
110
11

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2006
160
10

Personal genome research : what should the participant be told?
Amy L McGuire, James R Lupski. Trends Genet 2010
54
18

Incidental findings in human subjects research: what do investigators owe research participants?
Franklin G Miller, Michelle M Mello, Steven Joffe. J Law Med Ethics 2008
70
14

Incidental findings and ancillary-care obligations.
Henry S Richardson. J Law Med Ethics 2008
55
18

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
213
10

Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.
Ellen Wright Clayton. J Law Med Ethics 2008
42
21



Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.
Christopher A Cassa, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire, Kenneth D Mandl. Genome Res 2012
70
12

Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.
Christian M Simon, Janet K Williams, Laura Shinkunas, Debra Brandt, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011
34
26

To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.
Gabrielle M Christenhusz, Koenraad Devriendt, Kris Dierickx. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
105
9

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
158
9

Ethical, legal, and counseling challenges surrounding the return of genetic results in oncology.
Martijn P Lolkema, Christa G Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk, Annelien L Bredenoord, Peter Kapitein, Nancy Roach, Edwin Cuppen, Nine V Knoers, Emile E Voest. J Clin Oncol 2013
62
14

A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.
Lisa Eckstein, Jeremy R Garrett, Benjamin E Berkman. J Law Med Ethics 2014
23
39



Genomic research and incidental findings.
Brian Van Ness. J Law Med Ethics 2008
34
23


Ethical implications of the use of whole genome methods in medical research.
Jane Kaye, Paula Boddington, Jantina de Vries, Naomi Hawkins, Karen Melham. Eur J Hum Genet 2010
58
13

The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire. Genet Med 2012
87
9

Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms.
Holly K Tabor, Jacquie Stock, Tracy Brazg, Margaret J McMillin, Karin M Dent, Joon-Ho Yu, Jay Shendure, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2012
83
9


Genomic inheritances: disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives.
Ben Chan, Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Sara Chandros Hull, Leslie G Biesecker, Benjamin E Berkman. Am J Bioeth 2012
43
18

The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
Kristien Hens, Herman Nys, Jean-Jacques Cassiman, Kris Dierickx. J Med Ethics 2011
47
14

The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.
Isaac S Kohane, Daniel R Masys, Russ B Altman. JAMA 2006
213
7




Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.