A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

A Ancona, M Capodieci, A Galiano, F Mangieri, V Lorusso, G Gatta. Radiol Med 2011
Times Cited: 11







List of co-cited articles
96 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Atypical ductal hyperplasia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: considerations for surgical excision.
Christopher V Nguyen, Constance T Albarracin, Gary J Whitman, Adriana Lopez, Nour Sneige. Ann Surg Oncol 2011
69
72

Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: an automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?
Lee J McGhan, Barbara A Pockaj, Nabil Wasif, Marina E Giurescu, Ann E McCullough, Richard J Gray. Ann Surg Oncol 2012
62
63

Is surgical biopsy mandatory in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia on 11-gauge core needle biopsy? A retrospective study of 300 patients.
Caroline Forgeard, Medhi Benchaib, Nicole Guerin, Philippe Thiesse, Hervé Mignotte, Christelle Faure, Catherine Clement-Chassagne, Isabelle Treilleux. Am J Surg 2008
70
63

Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications.
Jennifer R Kohr, Peter R Eby, Kimberly H Allison, Wendy B DeMartini, Robert L Gutierrez, Sue Peacock, Constance D Lehman. Radiology 2010
74
54

Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy.
Isabelle Deshaies, Louise Provencher, Simon Jacob, Gary Côté, Jean Robert, Christine Desbiens, Brigitte Poirier, Jean-Charles Hogue, Eric Vachon, Caroline Diorio. Breast 2011
47
54

First International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).
Christoph J Rageth, Elizabeth Am O'Flynn, Christopher Comstock, Claudia Kurtz, Rahel Kubik, Helmut Madjar, Domenico Lepori, Gert Kampmann, Alexander Mundinger, Astrid Baege,[...]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016
85
54

Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis by directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Considerations for surgical excision.
Nour Sneige, Sung C Lim, Gary J Whitman, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Aysegul A Sahin, Terry L Smith, Carol B Stelling. Am J Clin Pathol 2003
67
45

Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study.
D L Page, W D Dupont, L W Rogers, M S Rados. Cancer 1985
741
45


Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: suspicion for ductal carcinoma in situ can stratify patients at high risk for upgrade.
Kimberly H Allison, Peter R Eby, Jennifer Kohr, Wendy B DeMartini, Constance D Lehman. Hum Pathol 2011
43
45

Flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia: carcinoma underestimation rate.
Anna Ingegnoli, Cecilia d'Aloia, Antonia Frattaruolo, Lara Pallavera, Eugenia Martella, Girolamo Crisi, Maurizio Zompatori. Breast J 2010
48
36


Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast.
Mijung Jang, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon, Jeong Seon Park, Min Hyun Seong, In Ae Park. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008
50
36

Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy.
Eunyoung Ko, Wonshik Han, Jong Won Lee, Jihyoung Cho, Eun-Kyu Kim, So-Youn Jung, Mee Joo Kang, Woo Kyung Moon, In Ae Park, Sung-Won Kim,[...]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008
53
36



Nomogram to predict the likelihood of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on a core needle biopsy in mammographically detected lesions.
Thaer Khoury, Xiwei Chen, Dan Wang, Prasanna Kumar, Maochun Qin, Song Liu, Bradley Turner. Histopathology 2015
29
36

Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: frequency, final surgical outcome, and factors associated with underestimation.
Benoît Mesurolle, Juan Carlos Hidalgo Perez, Fahad Azzumea, Emmanuelle Lemercier, Xuanqian Xie, Ann Aldis, Atilla Omeroglu, Sarkis Meterissian. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014
35
36

Scoring to predict the possibility of upgrades to malignancy in atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy device: an external validation study.
S Bendifallah, S Defert, N Chabbert-Buffet, N Maurin, J Chopier, M Antoine, C Bezu, D Touche, S Uzan, O Graesslin,[...]. Eur J Cancer 2012
23
36

Outcome of breast lesions diagnosed as lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3) or suspicious of malignancy (B4) on needle core biopsy, including detailed review of epithelial atypia.
Emad A Rakha, Bernard C Ho, Veena Naik, Soumadri Sen, Lisa J Hamilton, Zsolt Hodi, Ian O Ellis, Andrew H S Lee. Histopathology 2011
42
36

Factors that impact the upgrading of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Hatice Gümüş, Philippa Mills, Metehan Gümüş, David Fish, Sue Jones, Peter Jones, Haresh Devalia, Ali Sever. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013
13
36



Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.
Viviana Londero, Chiara Zuiani, Anna Linda, Luisa Battigelli, Giovanni Brondani, Massimo Bazzocchi. Eur Radiol 2011
45
27

Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy.
Byung Joo Chae, Ahwon Lee, Byung Joo Song, Sang Seol Jung. World J Surg Oncol 2009
39
27


High-risk breast lesions at imaging-guided needle biopsy: usefulness of MRI for treatment decision.
Viviana Londero, Chiara Zuiani, Anna Linda, Rossano Girometti, Massimo Bazzocchi, Francesco Sardanelli. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
34
27

Pure flat epithelial atypia (DIN 1a) on core needle biopsy: study of 60 biopsies with follow-up surgical excision.
Vincent Lavoué, Claire Marie Roger, Mathieu Poilblanc, Nicolas Proust, Camille Monghal-Verge, Christine Sagan, Patrick Tas, Habiba Mesbah, Philippe Porée, Catherine Gay,[...]. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011
48
27

Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy.
H-H Hsu, J-C Yu, G-C Hsu, C-P Yu, W-C Chang, H-J Tung, W-C Lin, S-H Tsai, G-S Huang. Ultraschall Med 2012
6
50

Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting.
K A Ely, B A Carter, R A Jensen, J F Simpson, D L Page. Am J Surg Pathol 2001
102
27

European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document.
N Perry, M Broeders, C de Wolf, S Törnberg, R Holland, L von Karsa. Ann Oncol 2008
453
27

Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy: which is the right management?
Quirino Piubello, Alice Parisi, Albino Eccher, Giovanna Barbazeni, Zeno Franchini, Antonio Iannucci. Am J Surg Pathol 2009
62
27

Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy.
David J Winchester, Joel R Bernstein, Jan M Jeske, Mary H Nicholson, Elizabeth A Hahn, Robert A Goldschmidt, William G Watkin, Stephen F Sener, Malcolm B Bilimoria, Ermilio Barrera,[...]. Arch Surg 2003
71
27

To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy?
Laura Liberman, Jennifer B Kaplan, Elizabeth A Morris, Andrea F Abramson, Jennifer H Menell, D David Dershaw. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002
85
27

Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome?
G Adrales, P Turk, T Wallace, R Bird, H J Norton, F Greene. Am J Surg 2000
85
27

Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Our experience in the management and long term clinical follow-up in 71 patients.
Antuono Latronico, Luca Nicosia, Angela Faggian, Francesca Abbate, Silvia Penco, Anna Bozzini, Christine Cannataci, Giovanni Mazzarol, Enrico Cassano. Breast 2018
14
27

Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision.
M L Darling, D N Smith, S C Lester, C Kaelin, D L Selland, C M Denison, P J DiPiro, D I Rose, E Rhei, J E Meyer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000
208
27

Characterization and outcome of breast needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening.
Emad A Rakha, Andrew H S Lee, Jacquie A Jenkins, Alison E Murphy, Lisa J Hamilton, Ian O Ellis. Int J Cancer 2011
64
27



Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI?
Anna Linda, Chiara Zuiani, Alessandro Furlan, Michele Lorenzon, Viviana Londero, Rossano Girometti, Massimo Bazzocchi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
52
18

Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods.
Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon, Joo Hee Cha, Sun Mi Kim, Seung Ja Kim, Sin Ho Lee, Hye Kyung Chung, Kyung Soo Cho, In Ae Park, Dong-Young Noh. Korean J Radiol 2005
50
18


Molecular evolution of breast cancer.
Peter T Simpson, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Theodora Gale, Sunil R Lakhani. J Pathol 2005
344
18

Flat DIN 1 (flat epithelial atypia) on core needle biopsy: 63 cases identified retrospectively among 1,751 core biopsies performed over an 8-year period (1992-1999).
Maritza Martel, Patricia Barron-Rodriguez, Idris Tolgay Ocal, Jorge Dotto, Fattaneh A Tavassoli. Virchows Arch 2007
64
18

High-risk lesions at MRI-guided breast biopsy: frequency and rate of underestimation.
Ana P Lourenco, Hanan Khalil, Matthew Sanford, Linda Donegan. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014
35
18

Underestimation rate of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Stefano Meroni, Anna Carla Bozzini, Giancarlo Pruneri, Oana Codrina Moscovici, Patrick Maisonneuve, Simona Menna, Silvia Penco, Lorenza Meneghetti, Giuseppe Renne, Enrico Cassano. Eur Radiol 2014
9
22



Is breast cancer overdiagnosis also nested in pathologic misclassification?
Catherine Colin, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Francesco Sardanelli. Radiology 2014
11
18


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.