A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

M D Dorrius, R M Pijnappel, P E Sijens, M C Jansen van der Weide, M Oudkerk. Eur J Radiol 2012
Times Cited: 20







List of co-cited articles
87 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Is breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammographic findings?
Linda Moy, Kristin Elias, Vashali Patel, Jiyon Lee, James S Babb, Hildegard K Toth, Cecilia L Mercado. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
71
30


Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Kevin Strobel, Simone Schrading, Nienke L Hansen, Alexandra Barabasch, Christiane K Kuhl. Radiology 2015
51
30

Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results.
C K Kuhl, R K Schmutzler, C C Leutner, A Kempe, E Wardelmann, A Hocke, M Maringa, U Pfeifer, D Krebs, H H Schild. Radiology 2000
401
20

Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Massimo Bazzocchi, Chiara Zuiani, Pietro Panizza, Chiara Del Frate, Franca Soldano, Miriam Isola, Francesco Sardanelli, Gian Marco Giuseppetti, Giovanni Simonetti, Vincenzo Lattanzio,[...]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006
81
20

Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Nicky H G M Peters, Inne H M Borel Rinkes, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Willem P T M Mali, Karel G M Moons, Petra H M Peeters. Radiology 2008
331
20

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.
David A Bluemke, Constantine A Gatsonis, Mei Hsiu Chen, Gia A DeAngelis, Nanette DeBruhl, Steven Harms, Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner, Nola Hylton, Christiane K Kuhl, Constance Lehman,[...]. JAMA 2004
346
20

Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Monique D Dorrius, Hildebrand Dijkstra, Matthijs Oudkerk, Paul E Sijens. Eur Radiol 2014
84
20

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Chunling Liu, Changhong Liang, Zaiyi Liu, Shuixing Zhang, Biao Huang. Eur J Radiol 2013
141
20

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.
Maki Hirano, Hiroko Satake, Satoko Ishigaki, Mitsuru Ikeda, Hisashi Kawai, Shinji Naganawa. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
79
20

Breast MRI used as a problem-solving tool reliably excludes malignancy.
Claudio Spick, Dieter H M Szolar, Klaus W Preidler, Manfred Tillich, Pia Reittner, Pascal A Baltzer. Eur J Radiol 2015
35
20

Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Katherine Vassiou, Theodorab Kanavou, Mariann Vlychou, Antigoni Poultsidi, Evagelos Athanasiou, Dimitrios L Arvanitis, Ioannis V Fezoulidis. Eur J Radiol 2009
31
15

Breast magnetic resonance imaging as a problem-solving modality in mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions.
M D Dorrius, R M Pijnappel, M C Jansen-van der Weide, M Oudkerk. Cancer Imaging 2010
20
15

The added value of quantitative multi-voxel MR spectroscopy in breast magnetic resonance imaging.
M D Dorrius, R M Pijnappel, M C van der Weide Jansen, L Jansen, P Kappert, M Oudkerk, P E Sijens. Eur Radiol 2012
19
15


Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.
D Le Bihan, E Breton, D Lallemand, M L Aubin, J Vignaud, M Laval-Jeantet. Radiology 1988
15

Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.
Katja Pinker, Wolfgang Bogner, Pascal Baltzer, Stephan Gruber, Hubert Bickel, Benedikt Brueck, Siegfried Trattnig, Michael Weber, Peter Dubsky, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath,[...]. Invest Radiol 2014
83
15

Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.
Liuquan Cheng, Yuhan Bai, Jing Zhang, Mei Liu, Xiru Li, Ailiang Zhang, Xiaojing Zhang, Lin Ma. Tumour Biol 2013
22
15

Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, Eduardo Figueiredo, Marisa Nassar Aidar Domingues, Romeu Cortes Domingues, Lea Mirian Barbosa da Fonseca, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
101
15

BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Elizabeth Lazarus, Martha B Mainiero, Barbara Schepps, Susan L Koelliker, Linda S Livingston. Radiology 2006
306
15

MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography.
Lifang Si, Renyou Zhai, Xiaojuan Liu, Kaiyan Yang, Li Wang, Tao Jiang. Diagn Interv Radiol 2016
13
23


In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast.
Peter Stanwell, Carolyn Mountford. Radiographics 2007
43
10

Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Mieke Kriege, Cecile T M Brekelmans, Carla Boetes, Peter E Besnard, Harmine M Zonderland, Inge Marie Obdeijn, Radu A Manoliu, Theo Kok, Hans Peterse, Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst,[...]. N Engl J Med 2004
10

Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer.
Aoi Matsuoka, Masako Minato, Masafumi Harada, Hitoshi Kubo, Yoshikatsu Bandou, Akira Tangoku, Kiichirou Nakano, Hiromu Nishitani. Radiat Med 2008
92
10

Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications.
R M Pijnappel, P H M Peeters, J H C L Hendriks, W P Th M Mali. Br J Radiol 2004
26
10


Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Takayoshi Uematsu, Sachiko Yuen, Masako Kasami, Yoshihiro Uchida. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007
38
10

MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.
Christiane K Kuhl, Simone Schrading, Heribert B Bieling, Eva Wardelmann, Claudia C Leutner, Roy Koenig, Walther Kuhn, Hans H Schild. Lancet 2007
439
10

Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography.
X Varas, F Leborgne, J H Leborgne. Radiology 1992
177
10


Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
Janet K Baum, Lucy G Hanna, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Mary C Mahoney, Emily F Conant, Lawrence W Bassett, Etta D Pisano. Radiology 2011
48
10

Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations.
Peter R Eby, Wendy B Demartini, Sue Peacock, Eric L Rosen, Bridget Lauro, Constance D Lehman. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007
37
10

The role of second-look ultrasound of BIRADS-3 mammary lesions detected by breast MR imaging.
V Fiaschetti, C Salimbeni, E Gaspari, G Kabunda Dembele, F Bolacchi, E Cossu, C A Pistolese, T Perretta, G Simonetti. Eur J Radiol 2012
18
11

Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma.
Ian G Murphy, Mary F Dillon, Ann O' Doherty, Enda W McDermott, Gabrielle Kelly, Niall O'Higgins, Arnold D K Hill. J Surg Oncol 2007
40
10

Breast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false-negative lesions.
Akiko Shimauchi, Sanaz A Jansen, Hiroyuki Abe, Nora Jaskowiak, Robert A Schmidt, Gillian M Newstead. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010
41
10

Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Wendie A Berg, Lorena Gutierrez, Moriel S NessAiver, W Bradford Carter, Mythreyi Bhargavan, Rebecca S Lewis, Olga B Ioffe. Radiology 2004
886
10

Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography.
Min Sun Bae, Woo Kyung Moon, Jung Min Chang, Hye Ryoung Koo, Won Hwa Kim, Nariya Cho, Ann Yi, Bo La Yun, Su Hyun Lee, Mi Young Kim,[...]. Radiology 2014
78
10

Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
Wendie A Berg, Zheng Zhang, Daniel Lehrer, Roberta A Jong, Etta D Pisano, Richard G Barr, Marcela Böhm-Vélez, Mary C Mahoney, W Phil Evans, Linda H Larsen,[...]. JAMA 2012
609
10

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.
Patricia A Carney, Diana L Miglioretti, Bonnie C Yankaskas, Karla Kerlikowske, Robert Rosenberg, Carolyn M Rutter, Berta M Geller, Linn A Abraham, Steven H Taplin, Mark Dignan,[...]. Ann Intern Med 2003
711
10


Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging.
Mary C Mahoney, Constantine Gatsonis, Lucy Hanna, Wendy B DeMartini, Constance Lehman. Radiology 2012
106
10

Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm(2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes.
Miho Ochi, Toshiro Kuroiwa, Shunya Sunami, Junji Murakami, Shinichiro Miyahara, Takashi Nagaie, Masafumi Oya, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Masamitsu Hatakenaka. Breast Cancer 2013
22
10

Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.
Erika Rubesova, Anne-Sophie Grell, Viviane De Maertelaer, Thierry Metens, Shih-Li Chao, Marc Lemort. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006
184
10

Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Nicky H G M Peters, Koen L Vincken, Maurice A A J van den Bosch, Peter R Luijten, Willem P Th M Mali, Lambertus W Bartels. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010
67
10

Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion.
R Turner, D Le Bihan, J Maier, R Vavrek, L K Hedges, J Pekar. Radiology 1990
432
10



Abdominal diffusion mapping with use of a whole-body echo-planar system.
M F Müller, P Prasad, B Siewert, M A Nissenbaum, V Raptopoulos, R R Edelman. Radiology 1994
196
10



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.