A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
Times Cited: 59







List of co-cited articles
455 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
209
45

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
285
42


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
38

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
161
32

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
474
30

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
67
30

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
252
27

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
122
23


Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
223
22

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
58
22


Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
306
20

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
137
18

Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire, Mildred Cho, Janet A Buchanan, Michael M Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk, Christina M Diaz, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Shane K Green, Marc A Hodosh,[...]. PLoS Biol 2008
156
16

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
198
16

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
127
16

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
114
16

Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Juli Murphy Bollinger, John F P Bridges, Ateesha Mohamed, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2014
37
27

Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: interest, impact, and demands on researchers.
Kurt D Christensen, J Scott Roberts, David I Shalowitz, Jessica N Everett, Scott Y H Kim, Leon Raskin, Stephen B Gruber. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011
38
23

The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.
Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Jonathan G Amatruda, Catherine M Clinton, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Noelle L Huntington, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. Genet Med 2012
39
23

IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research.
Lynn G Dressler, Sondra Smolek, Roselle Ponsaran, Janell M Markey, Helene Starks, Nancy Gerson, Susan Lewis, Nancy Press, Eric Juengst, Georgia L Wiesner. Genet Med 2012
51
17

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
86
15

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
Wylie Burke, Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Robin Bennett, Jeffrey Botkin, Ellen Wright Clayton, Gail E Henderson, Ingrid A Holm, Gail P Jarvik, Muin J Khoury, Bartha Maria Knoppers,[...]. Genet Med 2013
218
15

Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Michael J Bamshad, Holly K Tabor. Am J Med Genet A 2014
37
24

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
66
15

Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.
Wylie Burke, Barbara J Evans, Gail P Jarvik. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014
74
15

Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research.
Ellen Wright Clayton, Lainie Friedman Ross. JAMA 2006
75
13


Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
153
13

Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing.
Amy L McGuire, Timothy Caulfield, Mildred K Cho. Nat Rev Genet 2008
140
13



Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.
Christian M Simon, Janet K Williams, Laura Shinkunas, Debra Brandt, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011
35
22

Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.
Samantha A Streicher, Saskia C Sanderson, Ethylin Wang Jabs, Michael Diefenbach, Meg Smirnoff, Inga Peter, Carol R Horowitz, Barbara Brenner, Lynne D Richardson. J Community Genet 2011
60
13

Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Susan M Wolf, George J Annas, Sherman Elias. Science 2013
159
13


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
902
13

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Ebony B Bookman, Aleisha A Langehorne, John H Eckfeldt, Kathleen C Glass, Gail P Jarvik, Michael Klag, Greg Koski, Arno Motulsky, Benjamin Wilfond, Teri A Manolio,[...]. Am J Med Genet A 2006
162
11


Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting.
Conrad V Fernandez, Caron Strahlendorf, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Colleen O'Connell, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Kym Boycott, Poul H Sorensen. Genet Med 2013
37
18

Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research.
Meredith C Meacham, Helene Starks, Wylie Burke, Kelly Edwards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010
51
13

'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
S Daack-Hirsch, M Driessnack, A Hanish, V A Johnson, L L Shah, C M Simon, J K Williams. Clin Genet 2013
51
13

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
38
18

Parents' preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research.
S I Ziniel, S K Savage, N Huntington, J Amatruda, R C Green, E R Weitzman, P Taylor, I A Holm. Public Health Genomics 2014
23
30

Ethics of future disclosure of individual risk information in a genetic cohort study: a survey of donor preferences.
Kenji Matsui, Reidar K Lie, Yoshikuni Kita, Hirotsugu Ueshima. J Epidemiol 2008
21
28

The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.
C V Fernandez, D Santor, C Weijer, C Strahlendorf, A Moghrabi, R Pentz, J Gao, E Kodish. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007
51
11


Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.
N Arar, J Seo, S Lee, H E Abboud, L A Copeland, P Noel, M Parchman. Public Health Genomics 2010
15
40


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.