A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

David W Lee, James V Rawson, Sally W Wade. J Am Coll Radiol 2011
Times Cited: 30







List of co-cited articles
97 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging.
C Craig Blackmore, Robert S Mecklenburg, Gary S Kaplan. J Am Coll Radiol 2011
186
33


Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis.
Christopher L Sistrom, Pragya A Dang, Jeffrey B Weilburg, Keith J Dreyer, Daniel I Rosenthal, James H Thrall. Radiology 2009
211
26



Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience.
Daniel I Rosenthal, Jeffrey B Weilburg, Thomas Schultz, Janet C Miller, Victoria Nixon, Keith J Dreyer, James H Thrall. J Am Coll Radiol 2006
111
16


Addressing overutilization in medical imaging.
William R Hendee, Gary J Becker, James P Borgstede, Jennifer Bosma, William J Casarella, Beth A Erickson, C Douglas Maynard, James H Thrall, Paul E Wallner. Radiology 2010
352
13

The effect of incorporating guidelines into a computerized order entry system for diagnostic imaging.
Sarah Bowen, Keir Johnson, Martin H Reed, Liping Zhang, Lynn Curry. J Am Coll Radiol 2011
33
13

Strategies for managing imaging utilization.
Mark Bernardy, Christopher G Ullrich, James V Rawson, Bibb Allen, James H Thrall, Kathryn J Keysor, Christie James, John A Boyes, Worth M Saunders, Wendy Lomers,[...]. J Am Coll Radiol 2009
41
13

The recent downturn in utilization of CT: the start of a new trend?
David C Levin, Vijay M Rao, Laurence Parker. J Am Coll Radiol 2012
51
13



Utilization management in radiology, part 1: rationale, history, and current status.
Richard Duszak, Jonathan W Berlin. J Am Coll Radiol 2012
29
13

Increasing the appropriateness of outpatient imaging: effects of a barrier to ordering low-yield examinations.
Vartan M Vartanians, Christopher L Sistrom, Jeffrey B Weilburg, Daniel I Rosenthal, James H Thrall. Radiology 2010
70
13

Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department.
Ali S Raja, Ivan K Ip, Luciano M Prevedello, Aaron D Sodickson, Cameron Farkas, Richard D Zane, Richard Hanson, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Ritu R Gill, Ramin Khorasani. Radiology 2012
164
13

Bending the curve: the recent marked slowdown in growth of noninvasive diagnostic imaging.
David C Levin, Vijay M Rao, Laurence Parker, Andrea J Frangos, Jonathan H Sunshine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011
89
13

Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.
David J Brenner, Eric J Hall. N Engl J Med 2007
13

Utilization of diagnostic medical imaging: comparison of radiologist referral versus same-specialty referral.
G Scott Gazelle, Elkan F Halpern, Heather S Ryan, Angela C Tramontano. Radiology 2007
82
10


Experience of an academic neuroradiology division participating in a utilization management program.
David P Friedman, Nancy S Smith, Robert L Bree, Vijay M Rao. J Am Coll Radiol 2009
20
15

Effects of electronic decision support on high-tech diagnostic imaging orders and patients.
Leif I Solberg, Feifei Wei, John C Butler, Kevin J Palattao, Cally A Vinz, Melissa A Marshall. Am J Manag Care 2010
26
11

What does it cost physician practices to interact with health insurance plans?
Lawrence P Casalino, Sean Nicholson, David N Gans, Terry Hammons, Dante Morra, Theodore Karrison, Wendy Levinson. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009
124
10

Deauthorization: the insidious new payer trick.
Richard Duszak. J Am Coll Radiol 2006
8
37

Adoption and meaningful use of computerized physician order entry with an integrated clinical decision support system for radiology: ten-year analysis in an urban teaching hospital.
Ivan K Ip, Louise I Schneider, Richard Hanson, Dana Marchello, Patricia Hultman, Michael Viera, Brian Chiango, Katherine P Andriole, Andrew Menard, Susan Schade,[...]. J Am Coll Radiol 2012
58
10

Utilization management in radiology: basic concepts and applications.
Hansel J Otero, Silvia Ondategui-Parra, Eric M Nathanson, Sukru Mehmet Erturk, Pablo R Ros. J Am Coll Radiol 2006
21
14


The impact of ordering provider specialty on appropriateness classification.
Damita Jo Carryer, J Wells Askew, David Hodge, Todd D Miller, Raymond J Gibbons. J Nucl Cardiol 2012
12
25


A multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria.
Robert C Hendel, Manuel Cerqueira, Pamela S Douglas, Karen C Caruth, Joseph M Allen, Neil C Jensen, Wenqin Pan, Ralph Brindis, Michael Wolk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010
109
10



The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on medical-imaging services: a systematic review.
Andrew Georgiou, Mirela Prgomet, Andrew Markewycz, Edwina Adams, Johanna I Westbrook. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011
39
10

Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010.
Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Diana L Miglioretti, Eric Johnson, Choonsik Lee, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Michael Flynn, Robert T Greenlee, Randell L Kruger, Mark C Hornbrook, Douglas Roblin,[...]. JAMA 2012
533
10

Elements of danger--the case of medical imaging.
Michael S Lauer. N Engl J Med 2009
84
10

Impact of provider-led, technology-enabled radiology management program on imaging.
Ivan K Ip, Louise Schneider, Steven Seltzer, Allen Smith, Jessica Dudley, Andrew Menard, Ramin Khorasani. Am J Med 2013
45
10

Clinical decision support for imaging in the era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Hanna M Zafar, Angela M Mills, Ramin Khorasani, Curtis P Langlotz. J Am Coll Radiol 2012
24
12

Self-referral in medical imaging: a meta-analysis of the literature.
Ramsey K Kilani, Ben E Paxton, Sandra S Stinnett, Huiman X Barnhart, Vishal Bindal, Matthew P Lungren. J Am Coll Radiol 2011
29
6

In support of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Christopher Lee Sistrom. J Am Coll Radiol 2008
33
6

The opportunities and challenges posed by the rapid growth of diagnostic imaging.
Barbara M Rothenberg, Allan Korn. J Am Coll Radiol 2005
26
7

Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice--a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians.
B J Hillman, C A Joseph, M R Mabry, J H Sunshine, S D Kennedy, M Noether. N Engl J Med 1990
347
6

Physician self-referral for diagnostic imaging: review of the empiric literature.
Brian E Kouri, R Gregory Parsons, Hillel R Alpert. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002
58
6


Practice patterns of radiologists and nonradiologists in utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging among the Medicare population 1993-1999.
Andrea J Maitino, David C Levin, Laurence Parker, Vijay M Rao, Jonathan H Sunshine. Radiology 2003
66
6

The effect of self-referral on utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging.
David C Levin, Vijay M Rao. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011
37
6


Professional component payment reductions for diagnostic imaging examinations when more than one service is rendered by the same provider in the same session: an analysis of relevant payment policy.
Bibb Allen, William D Donovan, Geraldine McGinty, Robert M Barr, Ezequiel Silva, Richard Duszak, Angela J Kim, Pam Kassing. J Am Coll Radiol 2011
19
10

Physician orders contribute to high-tech imaging slowdown.
David C Levin, Vijay M Rao, Laurence Parker. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010
37
6

Reducing inappropriate diagnostic practice through education and decision support.
Phillip James Bairstow, Jennifer Persaud, Richard Mendelson, Long Nguyen. Int J Qual Health Care 2010
31
6

Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical center.
Raymond J Gibbons, Todd D Miller, David Hodge, Lynn Urban, Philip A Araoz, Patricia Pellikka, Robert B McCully. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008
126
6


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.