A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
826 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex.
Serge O Dumoulin, Brian A Wandell. Neuroimage 2008
636
69

Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
M I Sereno, A M Dale, J B Reppas, K K Kwong, J W Belliveau, T J Brady, B R Rosen, R B Tootell. Science 1995
30

Visual field maps in human cortex.
Brian A Wandell, Serge O Dumoulin, Alyssa A Brewer. Neuron 2007
711
27

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
24



Topographic representation of numerosity in the human parietal cortex.
B M Harvey, B P Klein, N Petridou, S O Dumoulin. Science 2013
251
21

Mapping hV4 and ventral occipital cortex: the venous eclipse.
Jonathan Winawer, Hiroshi Horiguchi, Rory A Sayres, Kaoru Amano, Brian A Wandell. J Vis 2010
164
21

Attraction of position preference by spatial attention throughout human visual cortex.
Barrie P Klein, Ben M Harvey, Serge O Dumoulin. Neuron 2014
94
22

Modeling center-surround configurations in population receptive fields using fMRI.
Wietske Zuiderbaan, Ben M Harvey, Serge O Dumoulin. J Vis 2012
91
21


Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields.
Brian A Wandell, Jonathan Winawer. Trends Cogn Sci 2015
96
17

Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex.
Jonas Larsson, David J Heeger. J Neurosci 2006
401
16

Attention reduces spatial uncertainty in human ventral temporal cortex.
Kendrick N Kay, Kevin S Weiner, Kalanit Grill-Spector. Curr Biol 2015
97
15


fMRI of human visual cortex.
S A Engel, D E Rumelhart, B A Wandell, A T Lee, G H Glover, E J Chichilnisky, M N Shadlen. Nature 1994
680
13

Visualization and measurement of the cortical surface.
B A Wandell, S Chial, B T Backus. J Cogn Neurosci 2000
187
12

Minimizing biases in estimating the reorganization of human visual areas with BOLD retinotopic mapping.
Paola Binda, Jessica M Thomas, Geoffrey M Boynton, Ione Fine. J Vis 2013
47
25

Larger extrastriate population receptive fields in autism spectrum disorders.
D Samuel Schwarzkopf, Elaine J Anderson, Benjamin de Haas, Sarah J White, Geraint Rees. J Neurosci 2014
75
14


Topographic representations of object size and relationships with numerosity reveal generalized quantity processing in human parietal cortex.
Ben M Harvey, Alessio Fracasso, Natalia Petridou, Serge O Dumoulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015
90
12

The foveal confluence in human visual cortex.
Mark M Schira, Christopher W Tyler, Michael Breakspear, Branka Spehar. J Neurosci 2009
100
11

Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses.
K J Friston, P Fletcher, O Josephs, A Holmes, M D Rugg, R Turner. Neuroimage 1998
11


Connective field modeling.
Koen V Haak, Jonathan Winawer, Ben M Harvey, Remco Renken, Serge O Dumoulin, Brian A Wandell, Frans W Cornelissen. Neuroimage 2013
48
22

Population receptive field dynamics in human visual cortex.
Koen V Haak, Frans W Cornelissen, Antony B Morland. PLoS One 2012
54
20


Large-scale remapping of visual cortex is absent in adult humans with macular degeneration.
Heidi A Baseler, André Gouws, Koen V Haak, Christopher Racey, Michael D Crossland, Adnan Tufail, Gary S Rubin, Frans W Cornelissen, Antony B Morland. Nat Neurosci 2011
131
11

Intersession reliability of population receptive field estimates.
Jelle A van Dijk, Benjamin de Haas, Christina Moutsiana, D Samuel Schwarzkopf. Neuroimage 2016
26
42

Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex.
Kendrick N Kay, Jonathan Winawer, Aviv Mezer, Brian A Wandell. J Neurophysiol 2013
141
11


Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus.
Manuela Piazza, Véronique Izard, Philippe Pinel, Denis Le Bihan, Stanislas Dehaene. Neuron 2004
644
10

Perceptual load affects spatial tuning of neuronal populations in human early visual cortex.
Benjamin de Haas, D Samuel Schwarzkopf, Elaine J Anderson, Geraint Rees. Curr Biol 2014
44
22

Comparing different stimulus configurations for population receptive field mapping in human fMRI.
Ivan Alvarez, Benjamin de Haas, Chris A Clark, Geraint Rees, D Samuel Schwarzkopf. Front Hum Neurosci 2015
33
30

Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex.
Robert F Dougherty, Volker M Koch, Alyssa A Brewer, Bernd Fischer, Jan Modersitzki, Brian A Wandell. J Vis 2003
357
10


Plasticity and stability of the visual system in human achiasma.
Michael B Hoffmann, Falko R Kaule, Netta Levin, Yoichiro Masuda, Anil Kumar, Irene Gottlob, Hiroshi Horiguchi, Robert F Dougherty, Joerg Stadler, Barbara Wolynski,[...]. Neuron 2012
57
15



Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex.
Andreas Nieder, David J Freedman, Earl K Miller. Science 2002
411
9

A new method for estimating population receptive field topography in visual cortex.
Sangkyun Lee, Amalia Papanikolaou, Nikos K Logothetis, Stelios M Smirnakis, Georgios A Keliris. Neuroimage 2013
37
24

Bayesian population receptive field modelling.
Peter Zeidman, Edward Harry Silson, Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf, Chris Ian Baker, Will Penny. Neuroimage 2018
31
29


Visual field map clusters in human frontoparietal cortex.
Wayne E Mackey, Jonathan Winawer, Clayton E Curtis. Elife 2017
50
18

Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex.
A T Smith, K D Singh, A L Williams, M W Greenlee. Cereb Cortex 2001
228
8

A visual sense of number.
David Burr, John Ross. Curr Biol 2008
343
8


Robust multiresolution alignment of MRI brain volumes.
O Nestares, D J Heeger. Magn Reson Med 2000
196
8

Modeling magnification and anisotropy in the primate foveal confluence.
Mark M Schira, Christopher W Tyler, Branka Spehar, Michael Breakspear. PLoS Comput Biol 2010
47
17



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.