A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Rhona Macleod, David Craufurd, Katie Booth. J Health Psychol 2002
Times Cited: 29







List of co-cited articles
104 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment.
B A Bernhardt, B B Biesecker, C L Mastromarino. Am J Med Genet 2000
99
34


A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
395
34

Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.
Patricia McCarthy Veach, Dianne M Bartels, Bonnie S Leroy. J Genet Couns 2007
145
31

Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box.
B B Biesecker, K F Peters. Am J Med Genet 2001
107
27

Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directions.
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, S D Sofia D Merajver. Soc Sci Med 2004
93
27

Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service.
Angela Davey, Kristie Rostant, Karen Harrop, Jack Goldblatt, Peter O'Leary. J Genet Couns 2005
52
27

Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling.
M Berkenstadt, S Shiloh, G Barkai, M B Katznelson, B Goldman. Am J Med Genet 1999
103
24


Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.
Patricia McCarthy Veach, Sarah E Truesdell, Bonnie S LeRoy, Dianne M Bartels. J Genet Couns 1999
34
20

Genetic counseling.
. Am J Hum Genet 1975
111
17


Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the new genetics.
Elizabeth Chapman, Jonathan A Smith. J Health Psychol 2002
81
13


Genetic counseling: provision and reception of information.
A Lippman-Hand, F C Fraser. Am J Med Genet 1979
80
13


Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families.
Marion McAllister, Katherine Payne, Stuart Nicholls, Rhona MacLeod, Dian Donnai, Linda M Davies. J Genet Couns 2007
34
13

Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services.
Marion McAllister, Katherine Payne, Rhona Macleod, Stuart Nicholls, Dian Donnai, Linda Davies. J Health Psychol 2008
64
13

Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures.
Katherine Payne, Stuart Nicholls, Marion McAllister, Rhona Macleod, Dian Donnai, Linda M Davies. Value Health 2008
71
13

Outcome measures for clinical genetics services: a comparison of genetics healthcare professionals and patients' views.
Katherine Payne, Stuart G Nicholls, Marion McAllister, Rhona MacLeod, Ian Ellis, Dian Donnai, Linda M Davies. Health Policy 2007
37
13

Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.
Bettina Meiser, Jennifer Irle, Elizabeth Lobb, Kristine Barlow-Stewart. J Genet Couns 2008
100
13


Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement.
S Shiloh, O Avdor, R M Goodman. Am J Med Genet 1990
93
10

Does indirect speech promote nondirective genetic counseling? Results of a sociolinguistic investigation.
J L Benkendorf, M B Prince, M A Rose, A De Fina, H E Hamilton. Am J Med Genet 2001
30
10

Outcomes and process in genetic counselling.
A Clarke, E Parsons, A Williams. Clin Genet 1996
57
10


Communication analysis of BRCA1 genetic counseling.
Lee Ellington, Debra Roter, William N Dudley, Bonnie J Baty, Renn Upchurch, Susan Larson, Jean E Wylie, Ken R Smith, Jeffrey R Botkin. J Genet Couns 2005
44
10


Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches.
Lee Ellington, Bonnie J Baty, Jamie McDonald, Vickie Venne, Adrian Musters, Debra Roter, William Dudley, Robert T Croyle. J Genet Couns 2006
31
10



What process attributes of clinical genetics services could maximise patient benefits?
Marion McAllister, Katherine Payne, Rhona Macleod, Stuart Nicholls, Dian Donnai, Linda Davies. Eur J Hum Genet 2008
31
10


Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.
M Broadstock, S Michie, T Marteau. Eur J Hum Genet 2000
241
6


Assessment of education and counselling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic.
V Collins, J Halliday, R Warren, R Williamson. Clin Genet 2000
32
6

Genetic risk and behavioural change.
T M Marteau, C Lerman. BMJ 2001
216
6

Patient Motivation, Satisfaction, and Coping in Genetic Counseling and Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2.
S Clark, L G Bluman, N Borstelmann, K Regan, E P Winer, B K Rimer, C S Skinner. J Genet Couns 2000
32
6

Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.
G Geller, J R Botkin, M J Green, N Press, B B Biesecker, B Wilfond, G Grana, M B Daly, K Schneider, M J Kahn. JAMA 1997
157
6


Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.
C Lerman, B Biesecker, J L Benkendorf, J Kerner, A Gomez-Caminero, C Hughes, M M Reed. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997
276
6


Genetic counselling: information given, recall and satisfaction.
S Michie, V McDonald, T M Marteau. Patient Educ Couns 1997
53
6


Factors influencing the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.
P G Frets, H J Duivenvoorden, F Verhage, M F Niermeijer, S M van de Berge, H Galjaard. Am J Med Genet 1990
62
6



Goals of genetic counseling.
B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2001
120
6

The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study.
A Cull, H Miller, T Porterfield, J Mackay, E D Anderson, C M Steel, R A Elton. Br J Cancer 1998
97
6



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.