A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Jonathan G Amatruda, Catherine M Clinton, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Noelle L Huntington, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. Genet Med 2012
Times Cited: 38







List of co-cited articles
209 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
203
36

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
298
34


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
34

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
281
28

Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
Vardit Ravitsky, Benjamin S Wilfond. Am J Bioeth 2006
222
26

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
158
26

Parents' preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research.
S I Ziniel, S K Savage, N Huntington, J Amatruda, R C Green, E R Weitzman, P Taylor, I A Holm. Public Health Genomics 2014
22
45


Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
56
23

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
89
23

Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board.
Ingrid A Holm, Sarah K Savage, Robert C Green, Eric Juengst, Amy McGuire, Susan Kornetsky, Stephanie J Brewster, Steven Joffe, Patrick Taylor. Genet Med 2014
40
23


Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
241
21

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
467
18

"I want to know what's in Pandora's Box": comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing.
Anne Townsend, Shelin Adam, Patricia H Birch, Zoe Lohn, Francois Rousseau, Jan M Friedman. Am J Med Genet A 2012
120
18

Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact.
Isaac S Kohane, Kenneth D Mandl, Patrick L Taylor, Ingrid A Holm, Daniel J Nigrin, Louis M Kunkel. Science 2007
100
18

The development of a preference-setting model for the return of individual genomic research results.
Phoebe L Bacon, Erin D Harris, Sonja I Ziniel, Sarah K Savage, Elissa R Weitzman, Robert C Green, Noelle L Huntington, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015
17
41

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
65
15


Personal utility and genomic information: look before you leap.
Scott D Grosse, Colleen M McBride, James P Evans, Muin J Khoury. Genet Med 2009
57
15

Pediatric research and the return of individual research results.
Denise Avard, Karine Sénécal, Parvaz Madadi, Daniel Sinnett. J Law Med Ethics 2011
28
21

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
124
15


Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.
Holly K Tabor, Tracy Brazg, Julia Crouch, Emily E Namey, Stephanie M Fullerton, Laura M Beskow, Benjamin S Wilfond. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011
36
13

Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
David J Kaufman, Juli Murphy-Bollinger, Joan Scott, Kathy L Hudson. Am J Hum Genet 2009
171
13

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
Paul A Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke, Jonathon Payne, Nathaniel Gonzalez, Jose G Conde. J Biomed Inform 2009
13

Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions.
Susanne B Haga, Julianne M O'Daniel, Genevieve M Tindall, Isaac R Lipkus, Robert Agans. Genet Med 2011
41
13


Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice.
Kristien Hens, Carla E Van El, Pascal Borry, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Martina C Cornel, Francesca Forzano, Anneke Lucassen, Christine Patch, Lisbeth Tranebjaerg, Eric Vermeulen,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
44
13

Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information.
Morris W Foster, John J Mulvihill, Richard R Sharp. Genet Med 2009
126
13

Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.
Lainie Friedman Ross, Howard M Saal, Karen L David, Rebecca R Anderson. Genet Med 2013
257
13

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
56
13

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
57
13


Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.
K E Ormond, A L Cirino, I B Helenowski, R L Chisholm, W A Wolf. Am J Med Genet A 2009
105
10

Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
A A Lemke, W A Wolf, J Hebert-Beirne, M E Smith. Public Health Genomics 2010
167
10

Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Gerard T Berry, Leslie G Biesecker, David P Dimmock, James P Evans, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri R Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2012
122
10

Personal genome research : what should the participant be told?
Amy L McGuire, James R Lupski. Trends Genet 2010
54
10

Parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common disease risk.
Kenneth P Tercyak, Sharon Hensley Alford, Karen M Emmons, Isaac M Lipkus, Benjamin S Wilfond, Colleen M McBride. Pediatrics 2011
51
10

Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement.
Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire, Mildred Cho, Janet A Buchanan, Michael M Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk, Christina M Diaz, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Shane K Green, Marc A Hodosh,[...]. PLoS Biol 2008
157
10

Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.
Flavia M Facio, Stephanie Brooks, Johanna Loewenstein, Susannah Green, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2011
97
10

Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery.
Michael J Bamshad, Sarah B Ng, Abigail W Bigham, Holly K Tabor, Mary J Emond, Deborah A Nickerson, Jay Shendure. Nat Rev Genet 2011
10

Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion.
David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa Leroy, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2008
60
10

Translational research in pediatrics: tissue sampling and biobanking.
Alayne R Brisson, Doreen Matsui, Michael J Rieder, Douglas D Fraser. Pediatrics 2012
47
10

The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop.
Muin J Khoury, Colleen M McBride, Sheri D Schully, John P A Ioannidis, W Gregory Feero, A Cecile J W Janssens, Marta Gwinn, Denise G Simons-Morton, Jay M Bernhardt, Michele Cargill,[...]. Genet Med 2009
151
10

Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases.
Scott D Grosse, Lisa Kalman, Muin J Khoury. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010
37
10

The Informed Cohort Oversight Board: From Values to Architecture.
Ingrid A Holm, Patrick L Taylor. Minn J Law Sci Technol 2012
13
30

Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion.
Kristien Hens, Emmanuelle Lévesque, Kris Dierickx. Hum Genet 2011
31
12

Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Denise Avard, Karine Sénécal, Ma'n H Zawati. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
46
10


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.